The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at “high-risk”. Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.

This systematic review examines the available clinical data on CD34+ cell mobilization, collection, and engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab in clinical trials and in real life. Twenty-six clinical reports were published between 2019 and February 2024. Most studies documented lower circulating CD34+ cells after mobilization compared to controls, leading to higher plerixafor requirements. Although collection yields were significantly lower in approximately half of the studies, the collection target was achieved in similar proportions of daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated and nontreated patients, and access to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was comparable. This could be explained by the retained efficacy of plerixafor in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-treated patients, while no chemotherapy-based or sparing mobilization protocol proved superior. Half of the studies reported slower hematopoietic reconstitution after ASCT in daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated patients, without an excess of infectious complications. While no direct effect on stem cells was observed in vitro, emerging evidence suggests possible dysregulation of CD34+ cell adhesion after daratumumab treatment. Overall, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies appear to interfere with CD34+ cell mobilization, without consistently leading to significant clinical consequences. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and define optimal mobilization strategies in this patient population.