Federico Piccioni

Dr. Federico Piccioni

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
orcid
Head of Anesthesia Unit 1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2018 in Journal of Thoracic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFederico Piccioni
Federico Piccioni
MSMatteo Segat
Matteo Segat
SFStefano Falini
Stefano Falini
MUMarzia Umari
Marzia Umari
OPOlga Putina
Olga Putina
ADAndrea Droghetti
Andrea Droghetti
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive technique that allows a faster recovery after thoracic surgery. Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles seem reasonably applicable to thoracic surgery, there is little literature on the application of such a strategy in this context. In regard to pain management, ERAS pathways promote the adoption of a multimodal strategy, tailored to the patients. This approach is based on combining systemic and loco-regional analgesia to favour opioid-sparing strategies. Thoracic paravertebral block is considered the first-line loco-regional technique for VATS. Other techniques include intercostal nerve block and serratus anterior plane block. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol are essential part of the multimodal treatment of pain. Also, adjuvant drugs can be useful as opioid-sparing agents. Nevertheless, the treatment of postoperative pain must take into account opioid agents too, if necessary. All above is useful for careful planning and execution of a multimodal analgesic treatment to enhance the recovery of patients. This article summarizes the most recent evidences from literature and authors’ experiences on perioperative multimodal analgesia principles for implementing an ERAS program after VATS lobectomy.

3 August 2020 in Anesthesia & Analgesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTT. Wesley Templeton
T. Wesley Templeton
FPFederico Piccioni
Federico Piccioni
DCDebnath Chatterjee
Debnath Chatterjee
One-lung ventilation in children continues to present technical and sometimes physiologic challenges to the clinician. The rarity of these cases at any single institution, however, has led to very few prospective trials to guide best practices. As a result, most clinicians continue to be guided by local tradition and preference. That said, the development of new bronchial blockers such as the EZ-Blocker or blocking devices such as the Univent tube have continued to evolve the practice of lung isolation in children. Further, the development of a variety of extraluminal blocker techniques has led to innovations in practice through a relatively diverse landscape of published case series offering different approaches to one-lung ventilation during the past 15 years. The Arndt bronchial blocker continues to represent the most well documented of these devices. Additionally, recent advances have occurred in our understanding of the relevant anatomic constraints of the lower pediatric airway. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive and practical update to practicing pediatric anesthesiologists to further their understanding of the modern practice of one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery in children.

1 August 2019 in Journal of Thoracic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NLNicola Langiano
Nicola Langiano
SFSilvia Fiorelli
Silvia Fiorelli
CDCristian Deana
Cristian Deana
ABAntonio Baroselli
Antonio Baroselli
EBElena Giovanna Bignami
Elena Giovanna Bignami
GRGiorgio Della Rocca
Giorgio Della Rocca
Background: One-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic anesthesia is required to provide good surgical exposure. OLV is commonly achieved through a double lumen tube (DLT) or a bronchial blocker (BB). Malposition is a relevant issue related to these devices use. No prospective studies with adequately large sample size have been performed to evaluate the malposition rate of DLTs and BBs. Methods: A total of 2,127 patients requiring OLV during thoracic surgery were enrolled. The aim of this multicenter prospective observational study performed across 26 academic and community hospitals is to evaluate intraoperative malposition rate of DLTs and BBs. We also aim to assess: which device is the most used to achieve OLV, the frequency of bronchoscope (BRO) use, the incidence rate of desaturation during OLV and the role of other factors that can correlate to this event, and incidence of difficult airway. Conclusions: DLT has a low malpositioning rate and is the preferred device to achieve OLV. BRO use recorded was unexpectedly low. The possibility of encountering a difficult airway is frequent, with an overall prevalence of 16%. Risk factors of desaturation are malposition and increased size of DLT. Minor thoracic surgery, left procedures, and BRO use could lead to fewer episodes of desaturation.

6 July 2017 in Tumori Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFilippo Bernasconi
Filippo Bernasconi
FPFederico Piccioni
Federico Piccioni
One-lung ventilation (OLV) is an anesthesiological technique that is increasingly being used beyond thoracic surgery. This requires specific skills and knowledge about airway management, maintenance of gas exchange and prevention of acute lung injury. Sometimes maintaining adequate gas exchange and minimizing acute lung injury may be opposing processes. Parameters validated for OLV titration still have not been found, but a multimodal approach based on low tidal volume, end-expiratory pressure application and alveolar recruitment maneuvers is considered the best way to ensure protective ventilation and reduce lung damage. The purpose of this review is to analyze all these factors using the latest scientific evidence and the opinions of the most influential authors.

27 April 2023 in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFederico Piccioni
Federico Piccioni
NLNicola Langiano
Nicola Langiano
EBElena Bignami
Elena Bignami
MGMarcello Guarnieri
Marcello Guarnieri
PPPaolo Proto
Paolo Proto
GRGiorgio Della Rocca
Giorgio Della Rocca

15 June 2016 in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFederico Piccioni
Federico Piccioni
FBFilippo Bernasconi
Filippo Bernasconi
GTGiulia T. A. Tramontano
Giulia T. A. Tramontano
MLMartin Langer
Martin Langer