In observational method projects in geotechnical engineering, the final geotechnical design is decided upon during actual construction, depending on the observed behavior of the ground. Hence, engineers must be prepared to make crucial decisions promptly, with few available guidelines. In this paper, we propose coupling numerical analysis with machine learning (ML) algorithms for enhancing the decision process in observational method projects. The proposed methodology consists of two main computational steps: (1) data generation, where multiple numerical models are automatically generated according to the anticipated range of input parameters, and (2) data analysis, where input parameters and model results are analyzed with ML models. Using the case study of the Semel tunnel in Tel Aviv, Israel, we demonstrate how this computational process can contribute to the success of observational method projects through (1) the computation of feature importance, which can assist with better identifying the key features that drive failure prior to project execution, (2) providing insights regarding the monitoring plan, as correlative relationships between various results can be tested, and (3) instantaneous predictions during construction.

This paper presents a philosophical examination of classical rock engineering problems as the basis to move from traditional knowledge to radical (innovative) knowledge. While this paper may appear abstract to engineers and geoscientists more accustomed to case studies and practical design methods, the aim is to demonstrate how the analysis of what constitutes engineering knowledge (what rock engineers know and how they know it) should always precede the integration of new technologies into empirical disciplines such as rock engineering. We propose a new conceptual model of engineering knowledge that combines experience (practical knowledge) and a priori knowledge (knowledge that is not based on experience). Our arguments are not a critique of actual engineering systems, but rather a critique of the (subjective) reasons that are invoked when using those systems, or to defend conclusions achieved using those systems. Our analysis identifies that rock engineering knowledge is shaped by cognitive biases, which over the years have created a sort of dogmatic barrier to innovation. It therefore becomes vital to initiate a discussion on the subject of engineering knowledge that can explain the challenges we face in rock engineering design at a time when digitalisation includes the introduction of machine algorithms that are supposed to learn from conditions of limited information.

The potential of machine learning (ML) tools for enhancing geotechnical analysis has been recognized by several researchers. However, obtaining a sufficiently large digital dataset is a major technical challenge. This paper investigates the use of transfer learning, a powerful ML technique, used for overcoming dataset size limitations. The study examines two scenarios where transfer learning is applied to tunnel support analysis. The first scenario investigates transferring knowledge between a ground formation that has been well-studied to a new formation with very limited data. The second scenario is intended to investigate whether transferring knowledge is possible from a dataset that relies on simplified tunnel support analysis to a more complex and realistic analysis. The technical process for transfer learning involves training an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) on a large dataset and adding an extra layer to the model. The added layer is then trained on smaller datasets to fine-tune the model. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of transfer learning for both scenarios. On this basis, it is argued that, with further development and refinement, transfer learning could become a valuable tool for ML-related geotechnical applications.

Numerical modeling is increasingly used to analyze practical rock engineering problems. The geological strength index (GSI) is a critical input for many rock engineering problems. However, no available method allows the quantification of GSI input parameters, and engineers must consider a range of values. As projects progress, these ranges can be narrowed down. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been coupled with numerical modeling to create surrogate models. The concept of surrogate models aligns well with the deductive nature of data availability in rock engineering projects. In this paper, we demonstrated the use of surrogate models to analyze two common rock slope stability problems: (1) determining the maximum stable depth of a vertical excavation and (2) determining the allowable angle of a slope with a fixed height. Compared with support vector machines and K-nearest algorithms, the random forest model performs best on a data set of 800 numerical models for the problems discussed in the paper. For all these models, regression-type models outperform classification models. Once the surrogate model is confirmed to preform accurately, instantaneous predictions of maximum excavation depth and slope angle can be achieved according to any range of input parameters. This capability is used to investigate the impact of narrowing GSI range estimation.

This paper explores the use of machine learning (ML) to analyze borehole data aiming to enhance geotechnical insights, using the Gaza Strip as a case study. The data set consists of 632 boreholes, with features including spatial coordinates, ground level, and soil type per depth. A random forest (RF) classification model was applied to predict soil types, achieving an accuracy of approximately 75%. Notably, the model retained this accuracy even when the data set size was reduced to 30%, suggesting predictable subsurface conditions over large areas. A comparative analysis of common misclassifications revealed that errors mostly occurred between similar soil types, indicating the model’s ability to capture meaningful geological patterns. Unsupervised learning using k-means clustering revealed no clear-cut boundaries between clusters, indicating localized geological anomalies despite large-scale predictability. These findings align with the demonstrated stability of the Gaza Tunnel Network (GTN), a vast network of tunnels which was constructed without comprehensive site investigations. This study demonstrates the potential of ML to improve geotechnical assessments and suggests that fewer boreholes may be needed for large-scale projects, offering cost-saving opportunities. For future research, it is recommended to integrate advanced ML tools, including large language models (LLMs) for analyzing qualitative data from borehole logs, and interpretability methods to enhance model explainability, thus enhancing geological understanding and increasing predictive power.

Designing sustainable underground metro lines in dense urban environments is a highly challenging task that requires the collaboration of numerous stakeholders and consultants to make crucial decisions influenced by several factors. While it is impossible to address every issue influencing the decision-making process, identifying key factors and their interdependencies is essential for optimal design. This study focuses on six critical aspects of the reference design of metro systems: (1) track alignment, (2) tunneling strategy, (3) station typology, (4) operations and maintenance, (5) procurement strategy, and (6) environmental aspects. Amongst these aspects, we identify track alignment as the primary driving factor that influences the other factors. We analyze the decision between shallow and deep alignments as an engineering choice that necessitates balancing conflicting factors and constraints. Our contribution lies in mapping these factors and their dependencies, thus offering policymakers, project managers, and designers a framework to navigate the design process. Our discussion also provides guidance to public agencies in tendering for design teams more efficiently. Drawing from lessons learned by experienced design managers, this study aims to fill the gap in the literature by offering a generalist perspective on metro design.