Johanna Witzell

Dr. Johanna Witzell

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, BOX 49, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2008 in Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell
Juan A. MartínJuan A. Martín
Juan A. Martín
Phenolic metabolites are frequently implicated in chemical defense mechanisms against pathogens in woody plants. However, tree breeding programmes for resistance to pathogens and practical tree-protection applications based on these compounds seem to be scarce. To identify gaps in our current knowledge of this subject, we explored some of the recent literature on the involvement of phenolic metabolites in the resistance of northern forest trees (Pinus, Picea, Betula, Populus, and Salix spp.) to pathogens. Although it is evident that the phenolic metabolism of trees is often activated by pathogen attacks, few studies have convincingly established that this induction is due to a specific defense response that is capable of stopping the invading pathogen. The role of constitutive phenolics in the resistance of trees to pathogens has also remained unclear. In future studies, the importance of phenolics in oxidative stress, cell homeostasis and tolerance, and the spatial and temporal localization of phenolics in relation to invading pathogens should be more carefully acknowledged. Possibilities for future studies using advanced methods (e.g., metabolic profiling, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and use of modified tree genotypes) are discussed.

16 March 2012 in Oecologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChristian Schiebe
Christian Schiebe
AHAlmuth Hammerbacher
Almuth Hammerbacher
GBGöran Birgersson
Göran Birgersson
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell
PBPeter E. Brodelius
Peter E. Brodelius
FSFredrik Schlyter
Fredrik Schlyter

31 July 2022 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMClara Martínez-Arias
Clara Martínez-Arias
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell
ASAlejandro Solla
Alejandro Solla
Juan A. MartínJuan A. Martín
Juan A. Martín
JRJesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada
Jesús Rodríguez-Calcerrada
The number and intensity of flood events will likely increase in the future, raising the risk of flooding stress in terrestrial plants. Understanding flood effects on plant physiology and plant‐associated microbes is key to alleviate flooding stress in sensitive species and ecosystems. Reduced oxygen supply is the main constrain to the plant and its associated microbiome. Hypoxic conditions hamper root aerobic respiration and, consequently, hydraulic conductance, nutrient uptake, and plant growth and development. Hypoxia favours the presence of anaerobic microbes in the rhizosphere and roots with potential negative effects to the plant due to their pathogenic behaviour or their soil denitrification ability. Moreover, plant physiological and metabolic changes induced by flooding stress may also cause dysbiotic changes in endosphere and rhizosphere microbial composition. The negative effects of flooding stress on the holobiont (i.e., the host plant and its associated microbiome) can be mitigated once the plant displays adaptive responses to increase oxygen uptake. Stress relief could also arise from the positive effect of certain beneficial microbes, such as mycorrhiza or dark septate endophytes. More research is needed to explore the spiralling, feedback flood responses of plant and microbes if we want to promote plant flood tolerance from a holobiont perspective.

4 April 2015 in BioControl
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKathrin Blumenstein
Kathrin Blumenstein
Benedicte Riber AlbrectsenBenedicte Riber Albrectsen
Benedicte Riber Albrectsen
Juan A. MartínJuan A. Martín
Juan A. Martín
Malin HultbergMalin Hultberg
Malin Hultberg
TSThomas N. Sieber
Thomas N. Sieber
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell

24 September 2019 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAdam Felton
Adam Felton
LPLisa Petersson
Lisa Petersson
ONOscar Nilsson
Oscar Nilsson
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell
MCMichelle Cleary
Michelle Cleary
MLMatts Lindbladh
Matts Lindbladh
The choice of tree species used in production forests matters for biodiversity and ecosystem services. In Sweden, damage to young production forests by large browsing herbivores is helping to drive a development where sites traditionally regenerated with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) are instead being regenerated with Norway spruce (Picea abies). We provide a condensed synthesis of the available evidence regarding the likely resultant implications for forest biodiversity and ecosystem services from this change in tree species. Apart from some benefits (e.g. reduced stand-level browsing damage), we identified a range of negative outcomes for biodiversity, production, esthetic and recreational values, as well as increased stand vulnerability to storm, frost, and drought damage, and potentially higher risks of pest and pathogen outbreak. Our results are directly relevant to forest owners and policy-makers seeking information regarding the uncertainties, risks, and trade-offs likely to result from changing the tree species in production forests.

28 February 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan A. MartínJuan A. Martín
Juan A. Martín
Johanna WitzellJohanna Witzell
Johanna Witzell
KBKathrin Blumenstein
Kathrin Blumenstein
ERElzbieta Rozpedowska
Elzbieta Rozpedowska
MHMarjo Helander
Marjo Helander
LGLuis Gil
Luis Gil
Efforts to introduce pathogen resistance into landscape tree species by breeding may have unintended consequences for fungal diversity. To address this issue, we compared the frequency and diversity of endophytic fungi and defensive phenolic metabolites in elm (Ulmus spp.) trees with genotypes known to differ in resistance to Dutch elm disease. Our results indicate that resistant U. minor and U. pumila genotypes exhibit a lower frequency and diversity of fungal endophytes in the xylem than susceptible U. minor genotypes. However, resistant and susceptible genotypes showed a similar frequency and diversity of endophytes in the leaves and bark. The resistant and susceptible genotypes could be discriminated on the basis of the phenolic profile of the xylem, but not on basis of phenolics in the leaves or bark. As the Dutch elm disease pathogen develops within xylem tissues, the defensive chemistry of resistant elm genotypes thus appears to be one of the factors that may limit colonization by both the pathogen and endophytes. We discuss a potential trade-off between the benefits of breeding resistance into tree species, versus concomitant losses of fungal endophytes and the ecosystem services they provide.