Current literature on reconstruction after head and neck cancer (HNC) focusses on short‐term patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), while there is a need for knowledge on long‐term consequences. Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for studies on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) after HNC reconstruction, using validated PROMs in at least 50 patients, and a follow‐up of more than 1 year. Thirty studies were included, comprising 2358 patients with a follow‐up between one and 10 years. The most used questionnaire was the UW‐QoL v4. Reconstructive surgery was generally followed by diminished oral function, worsened by radiotherapy. Patients experienced anxiety and fear of cancer recurrence. However, there was a progressive decrease in pain over time with some flaps having more favorable HRQoL outcomes. Age and bony tumor involvement were not related to postoperative HRQoL. These results may lead to better patient counseling and expectation management of HNC patients.

Background: The posterior Müller muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) procedure is a straightforward procedure for the correction of eyelid ptosis with a relatively short operating time and fast recovery. Traditionally, its use was limited to patients with mild involutional ptosis and good levator function and a positive phenylephrine test result. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of the MMCR procedure as a primary step to treat eyelid ptosis with varying etiology and severity, including patients with more severe ptosis and moderate levator function, and to produce a treatment algorithm. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the results of 34 patients, comprising 56 operated eyelids, treated with the MMCR procedure for eyelid ptotis between 2016 and 2018, was performed. Preoperative and postoperative pictures were analyzed for determining the margin-to-reflex distance (MRD1), symmetry, and complications. Results: We found a mean preoperative MRD1 of 1.3 mm (SD 1.1) and postoperative MRD1 of 3.2 mm (SD 1.0). The mean postoperative MRD1 for unilateral and bilateral cases was 3.4 (SD 0.8) and 3.2 (SD 1.1), respectively. Only 2 patients (5.9%) had an asymmetrical postoperative result (>1.0 mm MRD1 difference), and both were unilateral cases. Complications were scarce: only 1 patient (2.9%) developed dry eyes and 2 patients experienced temporary discomfort from the conjunctival sutures. Conclusions: The MMCR procedure appears to be an excellent procedure as a primary step to correct eyelid ptosis with varying etiologies and severity, due to its low risk of asymmetry, short learning curve, and high success rate. A flow chart as treatment algorithm is provided for clinical decision making. Level of Evidence: 4:

Background: Lower extremity free flap dangling protocols are still widely practiced, despite a paucity of evidence for their use. This pilot study investigates the use of tissue oximetry to provide further insight into the physiological effect of postoperative dangling in lower limb free flap transfer. Methods: Ten patients undergoing lower extremity free flap reconstruction were included in this study. Free flap tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂) was continuously measured using non-invasive near-infrared spectroscopy. Measurements were performed on the free flap and contralateral limb during dangling from postoperative day (POD) 7 until 11, according to the local dangling protocol. Results: StO₂ values measured in the free flap diminished to 70 ± 13.7% during dangling. This minimum StO₂ was reached significantly later, and correspondingly the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly larger on POD 11 compared to the start of the dangling protocol on POD 7, reflecting an improving free flap microvascular reactivity. The dangling slope was equal between the free flap and contralateral leg. The reperfusion slope was significantly flatter on POD 7 compared to the other PODs (p < 0.001). Thereafter, no significant differences between PODs were observed. Patients with a history of smoking had significantly lower tissue oximetry values compared to non-smokers. Conclusions: The application of tissue oximetry during dangling provides further insight into the physiological effect (i.e., changes in microcirculatory function) of the free flap of the reconstructed lower extremity. This information could potentially be useful to either revise or disrupt the use of such dangling protocols.

Background: Implants and DIEP flaps have different outcomes regarding postoperative breast sensation. When compared to the preoperative healthy breast, implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) negatively influences postoperative breast sensation. However, it is currently unknown whether a prior IBBR also influences postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. The goal of this cohort study is to evaluate the influence of an IBBR on the postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. Methods: Women were included if they received a DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy, with or without prior tissue expander (TE) and/or definitive breast implant. Sensation was measured at four intervals in 9 areas of the breast with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments: T0 (preoperative, implant/no reconstruction), T1 (2–7 months postoperative, DIEP), T2 (± 12 months postoperative, DIEP), Tmax (maximum follow-up, DIEP). Linear mixed-effects models were used to investigate the relationship between an implant/TE prior to the DIEP flap and recovery of breast sensation. Results: 142 women comprising 206 breasts were included. 48 (23.3%) breasts did, and 158 (76.7%) breasts did not have a TE/IBBR prior to their DIEP. No statistically significant or clinically relevant relationships were found between a prior implant/TE and recovery of DIEP flap breast sensation for the flap skin, native skin, or total breast skin at T1, T2, or Tmax. There were also no relationships found after adjustment for the confounders radiation therapy, BMI, diabetes, age, flap weight, follow-up, and nerve coaptation. Conclusions: An implant/TE prior to a DIEP flap does not influence the recovery of postoperative breast sensation of the DIEP flap.

Background Implants and DIEP flaps have different outcomes regarding postoperative breast sensation. When compared to the preoperative healthy breast, implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) negatively influences postoperative breast sensation. However, it is currently unknown whether a prior IBBR also influences postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. The goal of this cohort study is to evaluate the influence of an IBBR on the postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. Methods Women were included if they received a DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy, with or without prior tissue expander (TE) and/or definitive breast implant. Sensation was measured at four intervals in 9 areas of the breast with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: T0 (preoperative, implant/no reconstruction), T1 (2–7 months postoperative, DIEP), T2 (± 12 months postoperative, DIEP), Tmax (maximum follow-up, DIEP). Linear mixed models were used to investigate the relationship between an implant/TE prior to the DIEP flap and recovery of breast sensation. Results 142 women comprising 206 breasts were included. 48 (23.3%) breasts did, and 158 (76.7%) breasts did not have a TE/IBBR prior to their DIEP. No statistically significant or clinically relevant relationships were found between a prior implant/TE and recovery of DIEP flap breast sensation for the flap skin, native skin, or total breast skin at T1, T2, or Tmax. There were also no relationships found after adjustment for the confounders radiation therapy, BMI, diabetes, age, flap weight, follow-up, and nerve coaptation. Conclusions An implant/TE prior to a DIEP flap does not influence the recovery of postoperative breast sensation of the DIEP flap.