Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed. In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group. The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).

Patients with cancer are at high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Knowledge regarding the efficacy of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in actively treated cancer patients is limited as they had been excluded from the pivotal studies of these vaccines. We evaluated humoral and cellular immune responses in cancer patients after double vaccination and a booster dose and identified disease- and treatment-related factors associated with a reduced immune response. We also documented the number and outcome of breakthrough infections. Patients with metastatic solid malignancies undergoing active treatment were included if they had received two doses of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 and a booster dose. Other causes of immunosuppression and previous COVID-19 infections (positive anti-nucleocapsid titers) were exclusion criteria. Anti-spike antibodies, neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) and T-cell responses were assessed about 6 months after the two-dose vaccination and 4 weeks after the booster. Fifty-one patients had pre-booster and 46 post-booster measurements. Anti-spike titers after two vaccine doses were highly variable and significantly lower in older patients, during treatment with chemotherapy compared to targeted and endocrine treatments and in patients with low CD4+ or CD19+ cell counts. The booster dose led to a significant increase in anti-spike antibodies and nAbs, achieving almost uniformly high titers, irrespective of baseline and treatment factors. The cellular immune response was also significantly increased by the booster, however generally more stable and not influenced by baseline factors and treatment type. Seventeen patients (33%) experienced breakthrough infections, but none required hospital care or died from COVID-19. An mRNA vaccine booster dose is able to increase humoral and cellular immune responses and to overcome the immunosuppressive influence of baseline and treatment factors in cancer patients. Breakthrough infections were uniformly mild in this vaccinated high-risk population.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders with an increasing burden on health care systems. Evidence-based MDS guidelines and recommendations (G/Rs) are published but do not necessarily translate into better quality of care if adherence is not maintained in daily clinical practice. Guideline-based indicators (GBIs) are measurable elements for the standardized assessment of quality of care and, thus far, have not been developed for adult MDS patients. To this end, we screened relevant G/Rs published between 1999 and 2018 and aggregated all available information as candidate GBIs into a formalized handbook as the basis for the subsequent consensus rating procedure. An international multidisciplinary expert panel group (EPG) of acknowledged MDS experts (n = 17), health professionals (n = 7), and patient advocates (n = 5) was appointed. The EPG feedback rates for the first and second round were 82% (23 of 28) and 96% (26 of 27), respectively. A final set of 29 GBIs for the 3 domains of diagnosis (n = 14), therapy (n = 8), and provider/infrastructural characteristics (n = 7) achieved the predefined agreement score for selection (>70%). We identified shortcomings in standardization of patient-reported outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments that need to be optimized in the future. Our GBIs represent the first comprehensive consensus on measurable elements addressing best practice performance, outcomes, and structural resources. They can be used as a standardized instrument with the goal of assessing, comparing, and fostering good quality of care within clinical development cycles in the daily care of adult MDS patients.

The absolute monocyte count (AMC) is associated with mortality in a variety of medical conditions. Its prognostic impact in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) is less well studied. Therefore, we investigated its potential prognostic value in a cohort from the Düsseldorf MDS registry in relationship to the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R). An AMC below the population’s median (<0.2 × 10⁹/L) was associated with several adverse disease features such as lower haemoglobin levels, lower count of neutrophils and platelets, and a higher percentage of blasts in the bone marrow. MDS patients with an AMC < 0.2 × 10⁹/L had a significantly higher risk of progression into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a univariate, proportional hazards model the effect of the AMC as a continuous variable was modelled via p-splines. We found a U-shaped effect with the lowest hazard around 0.3 × 10⁹/L. Accordingly, an AMC within the last quartile of the population (0.4 × 10⁹/L) was associated with a reduced overall survival independently of IPSS-R, but not with the risk of secondary AML. Considering monocytopenia as a risk factor for AML progression in MDS may provide an additional argument for allogeneic transplantation or the use of hypomethylating agents in patients who are not clear candidates for those treatments according to current prognostic scoring systems and/or recommendations. Further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of the AMC in the context of prognostic scoring systems, considering the molecular risk profile, and to identify the mechanisms responsible for the higher mortality in MDS patients with a subtle monocytosis.

In myelofibrosis, the C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio (CAR) and the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) add prognostic information independently of the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). Their prognostic impact, if molecular aberrations are considered, is currently unknown. We performed a retrospective chart review of 108 MF patients (prefibrotic MF n = 30; primary MF n = 56; secondary MF n = 22; median follow-up 42 months). In MF, both a CAR > 0.347 and a GPS > 0 were associated with a shorter median overall survival (21 [95% CI 0–62] vs. 80 months [95% CI 57–103], p < 0.001 and 32 [95% CI 1–63] vs. 89 months [95% CI 65–113], p < 0.001). Both parameters retained their prognostic value after inclusion into a bivariate Cox regression model together with the dichotomized Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System (MIPSS)-70: CAR > 0.374 HR 3.53 [95% CI 1.36–9.17], p = 0.0095 and GPS > 0 HR 4.63 [95% CI 1.76–12.1], p = 0.0019. An analysis of serum samples from an independent cohort revealed a correlation of CRP with levels of interleukin-1β and albumin with TNF-α, and demonstrated that CRP was correlated to the variant allele frequency of the driver mutation, but not albumin. Albumin and CRP as parameters readily available in clinical routine at low costs deserve further evaluation as prognostic markers in MF, ideally by analyzing data from prospective and multi-institutional registries. Since both albumin and CRP levels reflect different aspects of MF-associated inflammation and metabolic changes, our study further highlights that combining both parameters seems potentially useful to improve prognostication in MF.

Background: The AML60+ score has been proposed for risk stratification in intensively treated elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Its prognostic impact in patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is unknown. Methods: Patients ≥ 60 years of age diagnosed with AML or MDS/AML according to ICC2022 were eligible for this retrospective and multicenter chart review if they had received at least one cycle of HMA-based treatment. Results: A cohort of 142 patients was analyzed. During follow-up (median 8 months), 114 patients died. The molecular Prognostic Score (mPRS) was available for 121 patients, the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 classification for 117 patients, and the AML60+ for 105 patients. According to AML60+, 33 patients (31.4%) were classified as very poor risk, 36 (34.3%) as poor risk, and 34 (32.4%) as intermediate risk. Two patients (1.9%) were classified as favorable. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.7 months (mo) for the combined intermediate/favorable group, 7 mo for the poor risk group and 3 mo for the very poor risk group (p < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis (reference category: very poor) showed a significantly lower risk of death for both intermediate/favorable risk patients (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10–0.31, p < 0.001) and poor risk patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.78, p = 0.004). The concordance score was 0.67 for AML60+, 0.60 for mPRS, and 0.58 for ELN2022. Conclusions: The AML60+ may represent a useful prognostic tool for elderly AML patients treated with HMA-based therapies. In particular, it could help to identify a group with a relatively favorable prognosis that is not clearly identified by the ELN2022 or the mPRS risk classification. However, analyses of larger cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings.