Johan G. C. Van Hasselt

Dr. Johan G. C. Van Hasselt

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 November 2016 in CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNT. H. T. Nguyen
T. H. T. Nguyen
MMM‐S Mouksassi
M‐S Mouksassi
NHN Holford
N Holford
NAN Al‐Huniti
N Al‐Huniti
IFI Freedman
I Freedman
FCfor the Model Evaluation Group of the International Society of Pharmacometrics (ISoP) Best Practice Committee
for the Model Evaluation Group of the International Society of Pharmacometrics (ISoP) Best Practice Committee
This article represents the first in a series of tutorials on model evaluation in nonlinear mixed effect models (NLMEMs), from the International Society of Pharmacometrics (ISoP) Model Evaluation Group. Numerous tools are available for evaluation of NLMEM, with a particular emphasis on visual assessment. This first basic tutorial focuses on presenting graphical evaluation tools of NLMEM for continuous data. It illustrates graphs for correct or misspecified models, discusses their pros and cons, and recalls the definition of metrics used.

28 February 2019 in Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMaddalena Centanni
Maddalena Centanni
DMDirk Jan A. R. Moes
Dirk Jan A. R. Moes
ITIñaki F. Trocóniz
Iñaki F. Trocóniz
Joseph CiccoliniJoseph Ciccolini
Joseph Ciccolini
JHJohan G. C. Van Hasselt
Johan G. C. Van Hasselt
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant clinical impact in improving overall survival of several malignancies associated with poor outcomes; however, only 20–40% of patients will show long-lasting survival. Further clarification of factors related to treatment response can support improvements in clinical outcome and guide the development of novel immune checkpoint therapies. In this article, we have provided an overview of the pharmacokinetic (PK) aspects related to current ICIs, which include target-mediated drug disposition and time-varying drug clearance. In response to the variation in treatment exposure of ICIs and the significant healthcare costs associated with these agents, arguments for both dose individualization and generalization are provided. We address important issues related to the efficacy and safety, the pharmacodynamics (PD), of ICIs, including exposure–response relationships related to clinical outcome. The unique PK and PD aspects of ICIs give rise to issues of confounding and suboptimal surrogate endpoints that complicate interpretation of exposure–response analysis. Biomarkers to identify patients benefiting from treatment with ICIs have been brought forward. However, validated biomarkers to monitor treatment response are currently lacking.

1 November 2017 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IKIsabelle Kohler
Isabelle Kohler
THThomas Hankemeier
Thomas Hankemeier
PGPiet H. van der Graaf
Piet H. van der Graaf
CKCatherijne A.J. Knibbe
Catherijne A.J. Knibbe
JHJohan G. C. Van Hasselt
Johan G. C. Van Hasselt
Novel developments in biomarkers discovery are essential in modern health care, notably in treatment individualization and precision medicine. Clinical metabolomics, which aims to identify small molecule metabolites present in patient-derived samples, has attracted much attention to support discovery of novel biomarkers. However, the step from discriminatory features of disease states towards biomarkers that can truly individualize treatments is challenging. Biomarkers used for treatment individualization can either be dynamic or static prognostic biomarkers. Dynamic biomarkers are relevant for describing the clinical response, including dynamical disease progression and associated treatment response. Static (prognostic) biomarkers do not describe but rather predict a clinical response, and typically reflect aspects of the physiological state of a patient related to drug treatment response or disease progression dynamics. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling represents an established approach for drug treatment individualization based on drug exposure or treatment response biomarkers, as well as for the description of disease progression dynamics. Here, we discuss how novel treatment individualization biomarkers can be identified using a clinical metabolomics-based approach, and how concepts inspired from the field of PK-PD modeling can be integrated in this process in order to increase the clinical relevance of identified biomarkers and precision medicine.

6 January 2019 in Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJohan G. C. Van Hasselt
Johan G. C. Van Hasselt
RIRavi Iyengar
Ravi Iyengar
The majority of diseases are associated with alterations in multiple molecular pathways and complex interactions at the cellular and organ levels. Single-target monotherapies therefore have intrinsic limitations with respect to their maximum therapeutic benefits. The potential of combination drug therapies has received interest for the treatment of many diseases and is well established in some areas, such as oncology. Combination drug treatments may allow us to identify synergistic drug effects, reduce adverse drug reactions, and address variability in disease characteristics between patients. Identification of combination therapies remains challenging. We discuss current state-of-the-art systems pharmacology approaches to enable rational identification of combination therapies. These approaches, which include characterization of mechanisms of disease and drug action at a systems level, can enable understanding of drug interactions at the molecular, cellular, physiological, and organismal levels. Such multiscale understanding can enable precision medicine by promoting the rational development of combination therapy at the level of individual patients for many diseases.

24 March 2022 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMaik Kok
Maik Kok
LMLoes Maton
Loes Maton
MPMarielle van der Peet
Marielle van der Peet
THThomas Hankemeier
Thomas Hankemeier
JHJohan G. C. Van Hasselt
Johan G. C. Van Hasselt
The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial pathogens represents a global health threat. The metabolic state of bacteria is associated with a range of genetic and phenotypic resistance mechanisms. This review provides an overview of the roles of metabolic processes that are associated with AMR mechanisms, including energy production, cell wall synthesis, cell-cell communication, and bacterial growth. These metabolic processes can be targeted with the aim of re-sensitizing resistant pathogens to antibiotic treatments. We discuss how state-of-the-art metabolomics approaches can be used for comprehensive analysis of microbial AMR-related metabolism, which may facilitate the discovery of novel drug targets and treatment strategies.

1 January 2018 in European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYumi Yamamoto
Yumi Yamamoto
PVPyry A. Välitalo
Pyry A. Välitalo
YWYin Cheong Wong
Yin Cheong Wong
DHDymphy R. Huntjens
Dymphy R. Huntjens
JPJohannes H. Proost
Johannes H. Proost
ELElizabeth De Lange
Elizabeth De Lange