This work evaluated the remarkable influence of stereotomy on discrete methods adopted for the dynamic response of an ancient masonry structure. The historic building used as a case study is the Church of Santa Maria of Varano in Muccia, in the province of Macerata, Italy, which was exposed to the severe seismic sequence that hit Central Italy in 2016, namely the major events of Accumoli, Visso, and Norcia. The structure was modeled using the actual stereotomy of blocks and three hypothetical arrangements of blocks of the masonry walls to investigate the existing crack pattern and vulnerabilities of the church. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the nonsmooth contact dynamics and discrete-element methods. These novel approaches suitably reproduced complex behaviors, considering large displacements and complete block separations, which is useful for upcoming retrofitting works.

The conservation of the historical and artistic heritage is one of the main priorities of Italian and international policy. The great variety of masonry buildings that make up this heritage is characterized by different combinations of materials and construction techniques. Then, several damage scenarios could be observed as a result, requiring appropriate retrofitting interventions. A rather accurate structural behavior analysis, especially for horizontal load conditions, allows for elaborating a correct seismic assessment. Albeit there are various numerical tools available to examine them, each one’s process starts by means of certain assumptions that could not be applied indiscriminately. This paper aims to compare two different types of modeling techniques to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. To achieve this goal, an earthquake-damaged complex in Central Italy was chosen as a case study. The structure was modeled using a finite element (continuous) and a distinct element (discontinuous) method. Both approaches underwent a nonlinear dynamic analysis using the strong motions recorded during the 2016 seismic sequence. The results show that both approaches can evaluate the weak structural points. However, in some cases, the distinct element method appeared more accurate in reproducing the cracks.