The purpose of the present investigation was to identify muscle damage, inflammatory response and oxidative stress blood markers in athletes undertaking the ultra-endurance MultiSport Brazil race. Eleven well-trained male athletes (34.3 ± 3.1 years, 74.0 ± 7.6 kg; 172.2 ± 5.1 cm) participated in the study and performed the race, which consisted of about 90 km of alternating off-road running, mountain biking and kayaking. Twelve hours before and up to 15 minutes after the race a 10 mL blood sample was drawn in order to measure the following parameters: lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase activities, lipid peroxidation, catalase activity, protein carbonylation, respiratory chain complexes I, II and IV activities, oxygen consumption and neopterin concentrations. After the race, plasma lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase activities were significantly increased. Erythrocyte TBA-RS levels and plasma protein carbonylation were markedly augmented in post-race samples. Additionally, mitochondrial complex II activity and oxygen consumption in post-race platelet-rich plasma were also increased. These altered biochemical parameters were accompanied by increased plasma neopterin levels. The ultra-endurance event provoked systemic inflammation (increased neopterin) accompanied by marked oxidative stress, likely by increasing oxidative metabolism (increased oxidative mitochondrial function). This might be advantageous during prolonged exercise, mainly for efficient substrate oxidation at the mitochondrial level, even when tissue damage is induced.

Dittrich, N, da Silva, JF, Castagna, C, de Lucas, RC, and Guglielmo, LGA. Validity of Carminatti's test to determine physiological indices of aerobic power and capacity in soccer and futsal players. J Strength Cond Res 25(11): 3099–3106, 2011—The aim of this study was to verify the validity of a new progressive distance and fixed time test (Carminatti's test [TCAR]) in estimating the main physiological indices of aerobic fitness in team-sport players. Thirty professional national level team-sport players (n = 12 futsal players and 18 soccer players) volunteered to participate in this study. The subjects performed the TCAR and a laboratory incremental treadmill test (ITT). The TCAR required subjects to complete repeated sets of 5 × 12-second shuttle-running bouts at progressive speed until volitional exhaustion. Each 12-second bout and series were separated by a 6- and 90-second recovery periods, respectively. The initial distance was set at 15 m and was progressively increased by 1 m each set. The ITT commenced at a velocity of 9.0 km·h−1 and was increased by 1.2 km·h−1 each 3 minutes until volitional exhaustion. Peak TCAR running velocity resulted not significantly (p > 0.05) different from speed at JOURNAL/jscr/04.02/00124278-201111000-00023/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T235458Z/r/image-pngO2max (vJOURNAL/jscr/04.02/00124278-201111000-00023/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T235458Z/r/image-pngO2max) during ITT. Peak TCAR running velocity was significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with vJOURNAL/jscr/04.02/00124278-201111000-00023/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T235458Z/r/image-pngO2max (r = 0.55) and JOURNAL/jscr/04.02/00124278-201111000-00023/ENTITY_OV0312/v/2017-07-20T235458Z/r/image-pngO2max (r = 0.51). No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) among the mean values of velocity and heart rate at the anaerobic threshold, estimated in the TCAR test and measured in the ITT. In light of this study results, the TCAR can be considered as a viable field test to estimate aerobic power and capacity in team-sports players. The limited devices and space required by TCAR warrant consideration for those strength and conditioning professionals who deal with team sports.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of eccentric cycling (ECC_CYC) training on performance, physiological, and morphological parameters in comparison to concentric cycling (CON_CYC) training. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect. Studies comparing the effect of ECC_CYC and CON_CYC training regimens on performance, physiological, and/or morphological parameters were included. Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis models were used to estimate the population’s mean difference between chronic responses from ECC_CYC and CON_CYC training protocols. Group levels and meta-regression were used to evaluate the specific effects of subjects and study characteristics. Fourteen studies were included in this review. The meta-analyses showed that ECC_CYC training was more effective in increasing knee extensor strength, vastus lateralis fiber cross-sectional area, and six-minute walking distance compared to CON_CYC. Moreover, ECC_CYC was as effective as CON_CYC in decreasing body fat percentage. CON_CYC was more effective in increasing $\dot{V}{O}_{2\max }$ and peak power output attained during concentric incremental tests. However, group-level analyses revealed that ECC_CYC was more effective than CON_CYC in improving $\dot{V}{O}_{2\max }$ in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. ECC_CYC is a viable modality for exercise interventions aiming to improve parameters of muscle strength, hypertrophy, functional capacity, aerobic power, and body composition, with more advantages than CON_CYC training in improving neuromuscular variables.

The maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) represents a submaximal intensity that may be important in prescribing both continuous and interval endurance training. This study compared time to exhaustion (TTE) at MLSS in continuous and intermittent (i.e., with pauses) exercise, investigating whether physiological variables differ between these exercise modes. Fourteen trained male cyclists volunteered for this investigation and performed an incremental test, several 30-min tests to determine two MLSS intensities (continuous and discontinuous protocol), and two randomized tests until exhaustion at MLSS intensities on a cycle ergometer. The intermittent or discontinuous protocol was performed using 5 min of cycling, with an interval of 1 min of passive rest. TTE at intermittent MLSS was 24% longer than TTE at continuous exercise (67.8 ± 14.3 min vs. 54.7 ± 10.9 min; p < 0.05; effect sizes = 1.04), even though the absolute power output of intermittent MLSS was higher than continuous (268 ± 29 W vs. 251 ± 29 W; p < 0.05). Additionally, the total mechanical work done was significantly lower at continuous exercise than at intermittent exercise. Likewise, regarding cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables, we observed greater responses during intermittent exercise than during continuous exercise at MLSS. Thus, for endurance training prescription, this is an important finding to apply in extensive interval sessions at MLSS. This result suggests that interval sessions at discontinuous MLSS should be used instead of continuous MLSS, as discontinuous MLSS allows for a larger amount of total work during the exhaustion trial.