The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of heat acclimatization (HAz) followed by heat acclimation (HA) on physiological adaptations. 25 male endurance athletes (age 36 ± 12 y, height 178.8 ± 6.39 cm, body mass 73.03 ± 8.97 kg, and VO_2peak 57.5 ± 7.0 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) completed HAz and HA. HAz was 3 months of self-directed summer training. In the laboratory, a 5-day HA prescribed exercise to target a hyperthermic zone (HZHA) of T_rec between 38.50 and 39.75 °C for 60 min. Exercise trials were 60 min of running (59% ± 2% VO_2peak) in an environmental chamber (wet bulb globe temperature 29.53 ± 0.63 °C) and administered at: baseline, post-HAz, and post-HAz+HA. Measured variables included internal body temperature (T_rec), heart rate (HR), and sweat rate (SR). Repeated measure ANOVAs and post hoc comparisons were used to assess statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences. T_rec was lower post-HAz+HA (38.03 ± 0.39 °C) than post-HAz (38.25 ± 0.42 °C, p = 0.009) and baseline (38.29 ± 0.37 °C, p = 0.005). There were no differences between baseline and post-HAz (p = 0.479) in T_rec. HR was lower post-HAz (143 ± 12 bpm, p = 0.002) and post-HAz+HA (134 ± 11 bpm, p < 0.001) than baseline (138 ± 14 bpm). HR was lower post-HAz+HA than post-HAz (p = 0.013). SR was higher post-HAz+HA (1.93 ± 0.47 L·h⁻¹) than post-HAz (1.76 ± 0.43 L·h⁻¹, p = 0.027). Combination HAz and HA increased physiological outcomes above HAz. This method can be used to improve performance and safety in addition to HAz alone.

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in metabolic heat production (H_prod), evaporative heat loss (H_evap), and dry heat loss (H_dry), following heat acclimatization (HAz) and heat acclimation (HA). Twenty-two male endurance athletes (mean ± standard deviation; age, 37 ± 12 y; body mass, 73.4 ± 8.7 kg; height, 178.7 ± 6.8 cm; and VO_2max, 57.1 ± 7.2 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) completed three trials (baseline; post-HAz; and post-HA), which consisted of 60 min steady state exercise at 59 ± 2% velocityVO_2max in the heat (ambient temperature [T_amb], 35.2 ± 0.6 °C; relative humidity [%rh] 47.5 ± 0.4%). During the trial, VO₂ and RER were collected to calculate H_prod, H_evap, and H_dry. Following the baseline trial, participants completed self-directed outdoor summer training followed by a post-HAz trial. Then, five days of HA were completed over eight days in the heat (T_amb, 38.7 ± 1.1 °C; %rh, 51.2 ± 2.3%). During the HA sessions, participants exercised to maintain hyperthermia (38.50 °C and 39.75 °C) for 60 min. Then, a post-HA trial was performed. There were no differences in H_prod between the baseline (459 ± 59 W·m⁻²), post-HAz (460 ± 61 W·m⁻²), and post-HA (464 ± 55 W·m⁻², p = 0.866). However, H_evap was significantly increased post-HA (385 ± 84 W·m⁻²) compared to post-HAz (342 ± 86 W·m⁻², p = 0.043) and the baseline (332 ± 77 W·m⁻², p = 0.037). Additionally, H_dry was significantly lower at post-HAz (125 ± 8 W·m⁻², p = 0.013) and post-HA (121 ± 10 W·m⁻², p < 0.001) compared to the baseline (128 ± 7 W·m⁻²). H_dry at post-HA was also lower than post-HAz (p = 0.049). H_prod did not change following HAz and HA. While H_dry was decreased following HA, the decrease in H_dry was smaller than the increases in H_evap. Adaptations in body heat exchange can occur by HA following HAz.

Assessing the adaptation of rectal temperature (T_rec) is critical following heat acclimatization (HAz) and heat acclimation (HA) because it is associated with exercise performance and safety; however, more feasible and valid methods need to be identified. The purpose of this study was to predict adaptations in T_rec from heart rate (HR), sweat rate (SR), and thermal sensation (TS) using predictive modeling techniques. Twenty-five male endurance athletes (age, 36 ± 12 y; VO_2max, 57.5 ± 7.0 mL⋅kg⁻¹⋅min⁻¹) completed three trials consisting of 60 min running at 59.3 ± 1.7% vVO_2max in a hot environment. During trials, the highest HR and TS, SR, and T_rec at the end of trials were recorded. Following a baseline trial, participants performed HAz followed by a post-HAz trial and then completed five days HA, followed by a post-HA trial. A decision tree indicated cut-points of HR (<−13 bpm), SR (>0.3 L·h⁻¹), and TS (≤−0.5) to predict lower T_rec. When two or three variables met cut-points, the probability of accuracy of showing lower T_rec was 95.7%. Greater adaptations in T_rec were observed when two or three variables met cut-points (−0.71 ± 0.50 °C) compared to one (−0.13 ± 0.36 °C, p < 0.001) or zero (0.0 3 ± 0.38 °C, p < 0.001). Specificity was 0.96 when two or three variables met cut-points to predict lower T_rec. These results suggest using heart rate, sweat rate, and thermal sensation adaptations to indicate that the adaptations in T_rec is beneficial following heat adaptations, especially in field settings, as a practical and noninvasive method.

Background: Athletes training in heat experience physiological and perceptual symptoms that risk their safety and performance without adaptation. Purpose: We examined the changes in environmental symptoms, assessed with the Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire (ESQ), during heat acclimatization (HAz), heat acclimation (HA), and intermittent heat training (HT). Methods: Twenty-seven participants (mean ± standard deviation [M ± SD], age of 35 ± 12 y, VO_2max of 57.7 ± 6.8 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) completed five trials involving 60 mins of running (60% vVO_2max) followed by a 4 km time trial in heat (M ± SD, temperature of 35.5 ± 0.7 °C, humidity of 46.4 ± 1.5%). The trials occurred at baseline, post-HAz, post-HA, at week 4 of HT (post-HT4), and at week 8 of HT (post-HT8). The participants completed HT once/week (HT_MIN), completed HT twice/week (HT_MAX), or did not complete HT (HT_CON). ESQ symptoms, thermal sensation (TS), and heart rate (HR) were measured pre- and post-trial. Results: Post-ESQ symptoms improved post-HA (3[0.40, 4.72], p = 0.02) and post-HAz (3[0.35, 5.05], p = 0.03) from baseline. During HT, symptoms improved in the HT_MAX group and worsened in the HT_MIN and HT_CON groups. Symptoms improved in the HT_MAX group versus the HT_CON group at post-HT8 (4[1.02, 7.23], p = 0.012). Higher TS and HR values were weakly associated with ESQ symptoms during HT (r = 0.20, p = 0.04), only explaining 20% of variance. Conclusions: ESQ symptoms improved during HAz, HA, and HT 2x/week. ESQ symptoms were not statistically correlated with HR during exercise heat stress. TS was not sensitive to detecting adaptation and did not subjectively change. The ESQ may be valuable in monitoring adaptation and may contribute to performance post-acclimation.

Recruiting companies recommend elite female soccer players be ≥165 cm (5′5″) in stature. This study investigated if stature limits match-playing time and performance in elite World Cup soccer among players, positions, and countries. We hypothesized stature would not affect match-playing time or performance. Descriptive data were collected on 552 players from 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup. Odds ratios determined likelihood of starting for players <165 cm and ≥165 cm. ANOVAs compared playing time between stature groups, among positions, and between countries. Performance factors including assists, goals, attempts, corners, shots blocked, and defending blocks were reported. Independent t-tests compared differences between players (≥165 cm, < 165 cm). Data are reported, mean difference [95% confidence interval] [MD (95%CI)] and effect sizes (ES). On average, 32.3% of players were <165 cm. Of total players, no differences existed in total minutes (F = 0.98, p = 0.32), matches (F = 0.27 p = 0.59), or average minutes per match (F = 0.48, p = 0.49) between stature groups, regardless of position. No differences existed in playing time between players 0.05), or between countries (p > 0.05). Taller mid-fielders exhibited greater performance in goals, assists, attempts, shots blocked, and defending blocks (MD [95%CI] ES; assists, −0.44[−0.76,−0.11]0.59, p = 0.009; goals, −0.35[−0.69,−0.01]0.44, p = 0.047); attempts, 3.14[1.38, 4.90]0.80, p = 0.001; corners, 2.04[0.12, 3.95]0.48, p = 0.037; shots blocked, 0.96[0.40, 1.51]0.75, p = 0.001; defending blocks, 0.43[0.32,0.82]0.48, p = 0.035), however, actual differences were minimal. Our findings indicate stature does not inhibit playing and performing elite women's soccer, as nearly one-third of players were <165 cm.