An analytical and experimental investigation was conducted herein to examine the cyclic load behavior of beam–column joint subassemblages, typical of both the modern reinforced concrete (RC) structures and of the pre-1960s–1970s existing ones. Seven exterior RC beam–column joint subassemblages were constructed and subjected to earthquake-type loading. Three specimens were designed according to the requirements of the Eurocode (EC) for ductility class medium (DCM), while the other three specimens possessed poor seismic details, conforming to past building codes. The hysteresis behavior of the subassemblages was evaluated. An analytical model was used to calculate the ultimate shear capacity of the beam–column joint area, while also predicting accurately the failure mode of the specimens. It was clearly demonstrated experimentally and analytically that it is possible for excessive seismic damage of the beam–column joint region to occur when designing according to the current European building codes. In addition, the proposed analytical model was found to be very satisfactory in accurately predicting seismic behavior and in preventing the premature brittle shear failure of the joints. The seventh subassemblage, constructed with steel fiber RC and significantly less transverse reinforcement than that required according to the EC, exhibited satisfactory ductile seismic performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed design solution.

Four exterior reinforced concrete beam–column joint subassemblages with poor reinforcement details and low-quality materials were constructed and subjected to cyclic lateral deformations under constant axial loading of the columns. The longitudinal rebars at the top of the beams were well-anchored in the joint region with a 90° hook and transversely welded to prevent premature slippage. The same was true for the longitudinal rebars at the bottom of the beam of the first specimen. Contrarily, the anchorage of the rebars at the bottom of the beam of the other three subassemblages was straight and of insufficient length. One of these specimens (the second) also had deficient lap splices of the column reinforcement, while the other three specimens had continuous column rebars. The third and the fourth subassemblage were designed with different joint aspect ratio and beam shear span/depth ratio values. The overall seismic performance of the specimens was evaluated and compared. The failure mode of the subassemblages was accurately predicted by the proposed analytical model. It was clearly demonstrated that the anchorage of the rebars, the length of the lap splices, the joint aspect ratio and the shear span/depth of the beam ratio value crucially affect the cyclic response of beam–column joints and, hence, may cause a severe detrimental impact to the overall structural integrity.

The cyclic performance of non-seismically designed reinforced concrete (RC) columns, strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) jackets, was analytically and experimentally investigated herein. Three cantilever column specimens were constructed, incorporating design parameters of the period 1950s–1970s, namely with concrete of a low compressive strength, plain steel bars, widely-spaced ties and inadequate lap splices of reinforcement. The specimens were strengthened using CFRP jackets and were subsequently subjected to cyclic inelastic lateral displacements. The main parameters examined were the length of the lap splices, the acceptable relative bar slipping value and the width of the jackets. The hysteresis behaviors of the enhanced columns were compared, while also being evaluated with respect to those of two original columns and to the seismic performance of a control specimen with continuous reinforcement, tested in a previous work. An analytical formulation was proposed for accurately predicting the seismic responses of the column specimens, comparing the actual shear stress value with the ultimate shear capacity of the concrete in the lap splice region. The test results verified the predictions of the analytical model, regarding the seismic performance of the strengthened columns. Moreover, the influences of the examined parameters in securing the ductile hysteresis performance were evaluated.

High-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete (HSFC) and ultra-high strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete (UHSFC) jackets have been proved experimentally to be much more effective with respect to other strengthening schemes in improving the hysteresis performance of existing substandard reinforced concrete (RC) structural members. In this paper, an existing analytical model for the prediction of the shear capacity of RC beam-column joints strengthened with a HSFC or UHSFC jacket is extended to provide design formulation of these innovative HSFC and UHSFC jackets. An authoritative validation of the proposed formulation is also achieved by comparisons of experimental results of 50 beam-column joint specimens with the analytical predictions of the model. Test data used for verification have been collected from the literature based on experimental studies of the authors and other researchers. The merits of the HSFC and UHSFC jacketing technique are also highlighted in the state of practice. Design and application of the proposed fiber-reinforced concrete jackets in deficient existing RC beam-column joints provides a sustainable strengthening technique by contributing to the reduction in the cost and to labor-intensive procedures of common jackets by completely replacing the installation of reinforcement.