Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the main therapy currently used in advanced malignant melanoma (MM) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the wide variety of uses, the possibility of predicting ICI efficacy in these tumor types is scarce. The aim of our study was to find new predictive biomarkers for ICI treatment. We analyzed, by immunohistochemistry, various cell subsets, including CD3+, CD8+, CD68+, CD20+, and FoxP3+ cells, and molecules such as LAG-3, IDO1, and TGFβ. Comprehensive genomic profiles were analyzed. We evaluated 46 patients with advanced MM (31) and NSCLC (15) treated with ICI monotherapy. When analyzing the malignant melanoma group, shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) was found in tumors positive for nuclear FoxP3 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (p = 0.048, HR 3.04) and for CD68 expression (p = 0.034, HR 3.2). Longer PFS was achieved in patients with tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1 (p = 0.005, HR 0.26). In the NSCLC group, only FoxP3 positivity was associated with shorter PFS and OS. We found that FoxP3 negativity was linked with a better response to ICI in both histological groups.

Purpose: Mutations or silencing of the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor gene accumulate hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF). HIF-2α is implicated in the oncogenesis of ∼50% of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) but has been considered “undruggable.” DFF332, an orally administered novel allosteric inhibitor of HIF-2α, showed dose-dependent antitumor efficacy in preclinical models of ccRCC. Patients and Methods: This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DFF332 in patients with heavily pretreated advanced ccRCC. Preliminary data from the dose escalation of DFF332 monotherapy, administered orally at 50 or 100 mg weekly or 25, 50, 100, or 150 mg once daily in 28-day treatment cycles, are reported. Results: As of January 15, 2024, 40 patients (median age, 62.5 years) received DFF332 for a median duration of 12.1 weeks. Overall, two patients (5%) achieved a partial response, and 19 (48%) achieved stable disease as the best overall response. DFF332 showed a favorable safety profile, with treatment-related adverse events occurring in 25 patients (63%). Only five patients (13%) experienced treatment-related anemia, and no hypoxia was observed. The only serious treatment-related adverse event, hypertension, was reported in one patient. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Conclusions: Although clinical responses were limited in the doses evaluated, dose exploration halted prematurely, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of DFF332. Further investigation is required to establish a recommended dose regimen, assess its efficacy and safety, and evaluate its full potential as a partner in combination studies.

Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. We analyze a new cohort of 706 patients (MMCI_706) as well as an independent cohort of 836 primary tumors with full gene expression information (SUPERTAM_HGU133A). We evaluate the risk of distant metastasis, analyze targetable molecular mechanisms in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and identify relevant inhibitors. Lymph node positivity is generally associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk (OR: 5.062 and 2.401 in MMCI_706 and SUPERTAM_HGU133A, respectively, p < 0.05) of distant metastasis in luminal A patients. However, a part (≤15%) of lymph node negative tumors at the diagnosis develop the distant metastasis which is related to cell proliferation control and thrombolysis. Distant metastasis of lymph node positive patients is mostly associated with immune response. These pro-metastatic mechanisms further vary in other molecular subtypes. Our data indicate that the management of breast cancer and prevention of distant metastasis requires stratified approach based on targeted strategies.

Background: Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFβ) plays a dual role in cancer, acting as a tumor suppressor early in disease but promoting progression and immune evasion when dysregulated. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), TGFβ-driven desmoplasia fosters chemoresistance and immunosuppression, limiting therapeutic efficacy. NIS793, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting TGFβ, demonstrated anti-fibrotic and immunomodulatory activity in preclinical models and early-phase trials. Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase II study in treatment-naïve metastatic PDAC patients to evaluate NIS793 ± spartalizumab (anti-PD-1) combined with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (ABRA/GEM) versus ABRA/GEM alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker analyses. Exploratory assessments included paired tumor RNA sequencing, cfDNA profiling, and plasma proteomics. Results: NIS793 demonstrated target engagement and suppression of TGFβ signaling, confirmed by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Stromal remodeling was evident, with significant downregulation of CAF markers (ACTA2, FAP) and collagen-related signatures. Despite proof-of-mechanism, clinical efficacy was not observed: median PFS and OS were comparable or numerically worse in NIS793 arm versus control (HR for OS in NIS793+ABRA/GEM vs ABRA/GEM: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84–2.07). Safety profile was manageable, with no unexpected toxicities. Biomarker data revealed increased expression of neutrophil-related genes post-treatment, suggesting potential induction of tumor-promoting inflammation. Conclusions: NIS793 effectively inhibited TGFβ signaling and led to stroma remodeling but failed to improve outcomes in metastatic PDAC. These findings highlight the complexity of TGFβ biology and caution against its blockade in combination with chemotherapy for PDAC. Future strategies should consider context-dependent effects of TGFβ inhibition(NCT04390763).