Duc Phan

Dr. Duc Phan

R&D, Trait Bioscience Inc, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2023 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABASIOFIOK IBEKWEABASIOFIOK IBEKWE
ABASIOFIOK IBEKWE
ABAnanda S. Bhattacharjee
Ananda S. Bhattacharjee
DPDuc Phan
Duc Phan
DADaniel Ashworth
Daniel Ashworth
MSMichael P. Schmidt
Michael P. Schmidt
CYChing-Hong Yang
Ching-Hong Yang

10 May 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVikram Kapoor
Vikram Kapoor
IGIndrani Gupta
Indrani Gupta
APA. B. M. Tanvir Pasha
A. B. M. Tanvir Pasha
DPDuc Phan
Duc Phan

1 December 2018 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPavlo Bohutskyi
Pavlo Bohutskyi
DPDuc Phan
Duc Phan
AKAnatoliy M. Kopachevsky
Anatoliy M. Kopachevsky
SCSteven Chow
Steven Chow
EBEdward J. Bouwer
Edward J. Bouwer
MBMichael J. Betenbaugh
Michael J. Betenbaugh

1 October 2020 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJessica Hinojosa
Jessica Hinojosa
JGJemima Green
Jemima Green
FEFabiola Estrada
Fabiola Estrada
JHJonathan Herrera
Jonathan Herrera
TMTroy Mata
Troy Mata
VKVikram Kapoor
Vikram Kapoor

1 February 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPavlo Bohutskyi
Pavlo Bohutskyi
DPDuc Phan
Duc Phan
RSRuth E. Spierling
Ruth E. Spierling
AKAnatoliy M. Kopachevsky
Anatoliy M. Kopachevsky
EBEdward J. Bouwer
Edward J. Bouwer
MBMichael J. Betenbaugh
Michael J. Betenbaugh

12 June 2019 in Frontiers in Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPavlo Bohutskyi
Pavlo Bohutskyi
TKTroy A. Keller
Troy A. Keller
DPDuc Phan
Duc Phan
MPMarkeshia L. Parris
Markeshia L. Parris
MLMengyuan Li
Mengyuan Li
AKAnatoliy M. Kopachevsky
Anatoliy M. Kopachevsky
Wastewater algal treatment systems show improved economic viability and enhanced energy return on investment if integrated with biofuel production. One option is to anaerobically digest the algae to generate bio-methane. This method is appropriate for relatively low lipid filamentous algae typical of turf scrubbers®. However, an unbalanced algal biomass composition (e.g. carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, C/N) and the resistance of algae to biodegradation can limit biomass conversion into bio-methane. To evaluate options to enhance bio-methane production, an indigenous assembly of macro-algae was established and cultivated in CO2-infused secondary wastewater effluent, then harvested and either anaerobically digested using pretreatments or co-digested with sewage sludge. Results were used to develop methane production kinetic models and perform an anaerobic digestion (AD) system energy balance analysis to assess the feasibility of pretreatment and co-digestion for a scaled process. Floways were dominated by Ulothrix and Oedogonium algae and had periphyton biomass production rates that averaged 3.7 ± 0.4 g VS m−2 d−1 (±1 SD) during the initial 7-day colonization period. Biomass increased by 62% in the second half of the 14-day experiment. Ultimate methane yield from harvested biomass was improved relative to controls (306 ± 13 mL gVS−1) through thermal pretreatment by 15%, dilute acid by 5%, dilute alkali by 17%, and acid- and alkali-assisted thermochemical pretreatments by 23 and 27%, respectively. However, all pretreatment methods undermined the energy balance parameters including Net Energy Ratio (NER) and Net Energy Efficiency (NEE) due to the heat required for thermal pretreatments and the electricity needed to produce chemical reagents. In contrast, co-digestion of algal biomass with sewage sludge synergistically enhanced methane generation, yielding up to 401±3 mL gVS−1 at an algae-to-sludge ratio of 20% to 80%. Co-digestion with sludge also strongly improved AD system energy balance. NER and NEE increased from 2.8 and 73% for algae alone to 4.3 and 81% for a 20% to 80% algae-to-sludge mix, respectively. Moreover, the Net Energy Recovery during co-digestion reached 39% compared to 26 and 33% when algae or sewage sludge were processed as single-substrates. Thus, co-digestion of algae with sewage sludge serves as an attractive option for maximizing energy gain from AD of biomass harvested from filamentous algal treatment systems.