To compare the level of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between patients receiving clear aligners or fixed appliances within one year of follow-up using Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14), a validated self-administered questionnaire. A single-centered, two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 36 adult patients (19 females, 17 males; age range: 18 to 25 years) who had severe crowding and require orthodontic treatment with first premolars extraction. The patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups: The clear aligners (CA) group and the fixed appliances (FA) group. OHRQoL was assessed using the OHIP-14 tool at various times during comprehensive orthodontic therapy: baseline (T0), one week (T1), two weeks (T2), one month (T3), 6 months (T4), and 12 months (T5) after starting the active orthodontic treatment. Mann-Whitney U test or Friedman test were used to detect significant differences. The level of significance was set at 5%. All of the selected patients entered the statistical analysis stage. There were no significant differences between the CA and FA groups for the psychological discomfort, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap (P˃0.05) at almost all assessment times. For the functional limitation, physical pain, physical disability, and the overall score, there were significant differences between the studied groups (P˂0.05), with the FA group having higher mean scores than the CA group in all of the assessment times. Patients' treatment with clear aligners has less impact on OHRQoL than those treated using conventional fixed appliances during the first year of treatment.

Introduction: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is a transient type of acute heart failure with distinct wall motion abnormalities and unclear pathophysiology. This review focuses on the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms that could be involved in the occurrence takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Main body: Acute stress and subsequent excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system are major factors in the pathophysiology of takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The high levels of catecholamine work in a triggering manner, generate reactive oxygen species, release inflammatory cytokines, and induce endothelial injury. The incidence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy has increased following COVID-19 infection and vaccination, which suggests that neumhormonal and psychological factors (i.e., fear and anxiety of infection or vaccination) may have an additional role in the pathophysiology. In addition, inflammatory state, cytokine storm, augmented sympathetic activity, and endothelial dysfunction during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection may participate in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Chronic stress is also linked to this complex mechanism by accelerating cripple of endocrinal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, which influences the cortisol effect on releasing catecholamine, which is directly related to the pathogenesis of takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: The excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system and subsequent high levels of catecholamines could initiate the process. The catecholamines, in turn, generate reactive oxygen species and release inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, CXCL1, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma), which causes endothelial injury.

Only a few studies in the literature have reported patient-centered outcomes associated with minimally invasive corticotomy, and thus, related scientific evidence is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes associated with upper canine retraction assisted with piezocision or laser-assisted flapless corticotomy (LAFC). Thirty-two patients (19 females, 13 males) at a mean age of 18.25 ±3.05 years were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: the LAFC group (LG; n = 16) and the piezocision group (PG; n = 16). In each group, the surgical procedure was randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch, and the other side served as the control. Standardized questionnaires using the numerical rating scale (NRS) were distributed to all patients during the 1st month after the surgical procedure at 4 time points: 24 h (T1); 3 days (T2); 7 days (T3); and 14 days (T4). The patients' responses were obtained, regarding their feelings of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating difficulty, jaw movement restriction, analgesic consumption, and satisfaction. The levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, and difficulty in chewing were significantly greater at the experimental sides as compared to the control sides only at T1 in both groups (p < 0.05). The levels of pain and discomfort in LG were significantly lower than those in PG only at T1 (p = 0.013 and p = 0.009, respectively) whereas there were no significant differences between the groups regarding swelling, eating difficulty, jaw movement restriction, and analgesic consumption. The patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction, with no significant differences. The levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating difficulty, and jaw movement restriction were dramatically decreased 1 day after flapless corticotomy treatment in both groups (p < 0.05). Both LAFC and piezocision were associated with high levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, and difficulty in chewing at T1. Laser-assisted flapless corticotomy caused less pain and discomfort than piezocision.

Periodontal ligament (PDL) pain, associated with the insertion of elastomeric separators, is one of the most annoying experiences at the beginning of orthodontic treatment. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has recently been suggested as a method of controlling this pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of LLLT on reducing the pain associated with elastomeric separation and to compare a single dose of LLLT (1 h before the insertion of elastomeric separators) vs 2 doses of LLLT (1 h before and immediately after the insertion). This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry of University of Damascus and at the Department of Orthodontics of Adib-Allaham Center in Damascus, Syria. The sample population was comprised of 36 patients, aged between 12 and 25 years (mean age: 17 ±3.7 years), and the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. A split-mouth design was employed. One group received 1 dose of laser therapy 1 h before the insertion of elastomeric separators, whereas the other one received 2 doses of laser therapy - 1 h before and immediately after the insertion of elastomeric separators. A GaAlAs laser with a wavelength of 830 nm and a power of 100 mW was used. The pain levels were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after 1, 6, 24, 48, and 96 h. Student's t-test and the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to detect significant differences. Low-level laser therapy significantly reduced post-separation pain when the experimental side was compared to the placebo side in the single-irradiation group (p < 0.05). Low-level laser therapy significantly reduced separation pain with no statistical difference between single and double irradiation protocols (p > 0.05). Low-level laser therapy had a positive effect on reducing the pain associated with elastomeric separation, whether it was applied as a single dose before elastomeric separation or as a double dose before and after this procedure.

Background and Objectives: To compare the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) outcomes between patients treated with modified Ni-Ti spring-based alignment appliances or conventional fixed appliances using the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14), as well as the levels of satisfaction with the appliance appearance, treatment progress, and outcomes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients (11 males, 25 females) were randomly divided into two groups: either the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs group (MAA) or the traditional fixed appliances group (FA). The allocation ratio was 1:1, and the randomization process was carried out by an independent investigator not involved in this study. Mild crowding cases were included in this study. The OHRQoL of patients was evaluated using the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) at five time points: before the treatment commencement (T0); 2 weeks (T1), 1 month (T2), and 2 months (T3) after the treatment initiation; and post-treatment (T4). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction. Blinding was performed only during the outcomes assessment. Results: This randomized controlled trial had no dropouts, and the demographic characteristics of the groups were comparable. The MAA group experienced significantly greater functional limitations compared with the FA group at all three evaluation time points (T1, T2, and T3), as evidenced by the statistically significant p-values (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The psychological disability in the MAA group was significantly lower than in the FA group at both T2 (p = 0.005) and T3 (p = 0.003). The patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was significantly higher in the MAA group than in the FA group (p = 0.002). Conclusions: The OHRQoL improved in both the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs and fixed appliance groups after the treatment. Moreover, the functional limitations during the treatment were less severe in the FA group, while the psychological disability was lower, and the patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was higher in the MAA group.

The pain and discomfort associated with orthodontic treatment are considered undesirable complications which may negatively affect the patient’s cooperation and reduce the efficiency of orthodontic treatment. This trial aimed to assess patient-centered outcomes in the treatment of class I malocclusion with severe crowding using self-ligating brackets (SLBs) with or without an acceleration procedure (piezocision) compared to the traditional brackets (TBs) in a three-arm trial. Sixty-six patients (51 females, 15 males; mean age ± SD: 20.08 ± 2.61 years) attending the Department of Orthodontics, the University of Damascus, Damascus (Syria) from April 2019 to October 2020 participated in this study. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups: the TBs s group (n = 22; mean age ± SD: 18.72 ± 2.42), the SLBs group (n = 22; mean age ± SD: 20.48 ± 2.84), and the SLBs with the piezocision group (SLBs+P; n = 22; mean age ± SD: 19.17 ± 2.59). Patient-centered outcomes were assessed using two standardized questionnaires depending on visual analog scales (VAS) for the majority of the questions and a binary scale (Yes/No) for the last two questions in the second questionnaire. The levels of pain, discomfort, swelling, difficulties with mastication, swallowing, and jaw movement restriction were measured at five assessment times: one day (T1), 3 days (T2), 7 days (T3), 14 days (T4), and 28 days (T5) after the beginning of treatment. The satisfaction levels, acceptance to undergo the applied treatment again, and willingness to advise a friend to receive similar treatment were measured at the last assessment time (T5). One-way ANOVA test or its alternative nonparametric test (i.e., Kruskal-Wallis test) was utilized to compare the three groups. There were statistically significant differences between the three groups regarding pain, discomfort, swelling, difficulties with mastication, problems with swallowing, and jaw movement restriction during the first three assessment times only (T1, T2, and T3; P < 0.001). The differences were mainly between the SLBs+P group and the other two groups, where the mean values were greater in the SLBs+P group. Otherwise, there were no significant statistical differences between the SLBs and the TBs groups. Concerning patients’ satisfaction with the provided treatment, a statistically significant difference between the three groups was detected after 28 days (T5; P < 0.001). The SLBs+P group showed the lowest mean values, whereas there were no significant differences between the two other groups. The levels of pain and discomfort, swelling, difficulties in mastication and swallowing, and restriction of jaw movement were greater in SLBs with the piezocision group compared to the sole use of SLBs or TBs in the first week only. The patients showed a high level of satisfaction with the applied therapeutic procedures, which means that SLBs alone or in combination with piezocision can be an accepted treatment modality by patients in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement.