Esther Ososanya

Dr. Esther Ososanya


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
MQMiftahul Qorib
Miftahul Qorib
Timothy OladunniTimothy Oladunni
Timothy Oladunni
MDMax Denis
Max Denis
EOEsther Ososanya
Esther Ososanya
PCPaul Cotae
Paul Cotae
Popular social media platforms, such as Twitter, have become an excellent source of information with their swift information dissemination. Individuals with different backgrounds convey their opinions through social media platforms. Consequently, these platforms have become a profound instrument for collecting enormous datasets. We believe that compiling, organizing, exploring, and analyzing data from social media platforms, such as Twitter, can offer various perspectives to public health organizations and decision makers in identifying factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy. In this study, public tweets were downloaded daily from Tweeter using the Tweeter API. Before performing computation, the tweets were preprocessed and labeled. Vocabulary normalization was based on stemming and lemmatization. The NRCLexicon technique was deployed to convert the tweets into ten classes: positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and eight basic emotions (joy, trust, fear, surprise, anticipation, anger, disgust, and sadness). t-test was used to check the statistical significance of the relationships among the basic emotions. Our analysis shows that the p-values of joy–sadness, trust–disgust, fear–anger, surprise–anticipation, and negative–positive relations are close to zero. Finally, neural network architectures, including 1DCNN, LSTM, Multiple-Layer Perceptron, and BERT, were trained and tested in a COVID-19 multi-classification of sentiments and emotions (positive, negative, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation). Our experiment attained an accuracy of 88.6% for 1DCNN at 1744 s, 89.93% accuracy for LSTM at 27,597 s, while MLP achieved an accuracy of 84.78% at 203 s. The study results show that the BERT model performed the best, with an accuracy of 96.71% at 8429 s.

1 January 2009 in SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EME.L. Morgan
E.L. Morgan
DGD.B. George
D.B. George
NTN. Thirunavukkarasu
N. Thirunavukkarasu
EOEsther Ososanya
Esther Ososanya
(2009). Using artificial intelligence to detect fish breathing stress in remote automated biosensing for coordinated watershed monitoring networks. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010: Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 971-976.