Given its physical characteristics and the range of services that it can provide, energy storage raises unique modeling challenges. This paper summarizes capabilities that operational, planning, and resource-adequacy models that include energy storage should have and surveys gaps in extant models. Existing models that represent energy storage differ in fidelity of representing the balance of the power system and energy-storage applications. Modeling results are sensitive to these differences. The importance of capturing chronology can raise challenges in energy-storage modeling. Some models ‘decouple’ individual operating periods from one another, allowing for natural decomposition and rendering the models relatively computationally tractable. Energy storage complicates such a modeling approach. Improving the representation of the balance of the system can have major effects in capturing energy-storage costs and benefits.

Power system capacity-expansion models are typically intractable if every operating period is represented. This issue is normally overcome by using a subset of representative operating periods. For instance, representative operating hours can be selected by discretizing the load-duration curve, which captures the effect of load levels on system-operation costs. This approach is inappropriate if system-operating costs depend on parameters other than load (e.g., renewable-resource availability) or if there are important intertemporal operating constraints (e.g., generator-ramping limits). This paper proposes the use of representative operating days, which are selected using clustering, to surmount these issues. We propose two hierarchical clustering techniques, which are designed to capture the important statistical features of the parameters (e.g., load and renewable-resource availability), in selecting representative days. This includes temporal autocorrelations and correlations between different locations. A case study, which is based on the Texan power system, is used to demonstrate the techniques. We show that our proposed clustering techniques result in investment decisions that closely match those made using the full unclustered dataset.

We propose a multistage multiscale linear stochastic model to optimize electricity generation, storage, and transmission investments over a long planning horizon. The multiscale structure captures “large-scale” uncertainties, such as investment and fuel-cost changes and long-run demand-growth rates, and “small-scale” uncertainties, such as hour-to-hour demand and renewable-availability uncertainty. The model also includes a detailed treatment of operating periods so that the effect of dispatch decisions on long-term investments are captured. The proposed model can be large in size. The progressive hedging algorithm is applied to decompose the model by scenario, greatly reducing computation times. We also derive bounds on the optimal objective-function value, to assess solution quality. We use a case study based on the state of Texas to demonstrate the model and show the benefits of its detailed representation of the operating periods in making investment decisions.

The interdependency between natural gas and electric power systems is becoming increasingly tight as the share of natural gas-fired generators increases. Within this context, this paper addresses the coordinated expansion planning of natural gas and power systems. We analyze the trade-off of building natural gas-related and other facilities. We use a two-stage stochastic optimization model that provides an appropriate balance between accuracy and computational tractability and represents uncertainty pertaining to electricity and natural gas demands. We analyze the functioning of the model through a small example and a case study based on the IEEE 118-bus system.