(1) Background: Despite the prognostic improvements achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a minority of patients still fail TKIs. The recent introduction of asciminib may be a promising option in intolerant patients, as it is a first-in-class inhibitor with a more selective mechanism of action different from the ATP-competitive inhibition that occurs with TKIs. Therefore, our goal was to analyze toxicities shown with asciminib as well as to study cross-toxicity with previous TKIs. (2) Methods: An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was performed with data from 77 patients with CML with therapeutic failure to second-generation TKIs who received asciminib through a managed-access program (MAP) (3) Results: With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 22 patients (28.5%) discontinued treatment: 32% (7/22) due to intolerance and 45% (10/22) due to resistance. Fifty-five percent of the patients reported adverse effects (AEs) with asciminib and eighteen percent grade 3–4. Most frequent AEs were: fatigue (18%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (12%), and arthralgias (12%). None of the patients experienced cardiovascular events or occlusive arterial disease. Further, 26%, 25%, and 9% of patients required dose adjustment, temporary suspension, or definitive discontinuation of treatment, respectively. Toxicities under asciminib seemed lower than with prior TKIs for anemia, cardiovascular events, pleural/pericardial effusion, diarrhea, and edema. Cross-toxicity risk was statistically significant for thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, vomiting, and pancreatitis. (4) Conclusion: Asciminib is a molecule with a good safety profile and with a low rate of AEs. However, despite its new mechanism of action, asciminib presents a risk of cross-toxicity with classical TKIs for some AEs.

Click on the article title to read more.

Oncohematological patients show a low immune response against SARS-CoV-2, both to natural infection and after vaccination. Most studies are focused on the analysis of the humoral response; therefore, the information available about the cellular immune response is limited. In this study, we analyzed the humoral and cellular immune responses in nine individuals who received chemotherapy for their oncohematological diseases, as well as consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), after being naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2. All individuals had asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 and were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. These results were compared with matched healthy individuals who also had mild COVID-19. The humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in 6 of 9 oncohematological individuals prior to ASCT. The levels of antibodies and their neutralization capacity decreased after ASCT. Conversely, an enhanced cytotoxic activity against SARS-CoV-2-infected cells was observed after chemotherapy plus ASCT, mostly based on high levels of NK, NKT, and CD8+TCRγδ+ cell populations that were able to produce IFNγ and TNFα. These results highlight the importance of performing analyses not only to evaluate the levels of IgGs against SARS-CoV-2, but also to determine the quality of the cellular immune response developed during the immune reconstitution after ASCT.

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have failed conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cTKIs) and asciminib constitute a complex group of patients with few therapeutic options. A retrospective descriptive multicenter observational study was carried out including patients with CML who had presented a therapeutic failure to ≥ 2 cTKIs and asciminib, and had received or were not candidates to ponatinib. Of the 19 patients enrolled, 8 patients failed asciminib due to intolerance and 11 due to resistance. The most common strategy for intolerant patients was to initiate a previously administered cTKI (6/8) with dose adjustments or symptomatic management of adverse events (AEs). Of the patients who failed due to resistance, only patients who underwent progenitor transplantation achieved profound long-term responses. A frequent strategy was to use ponatinib (4/11) in patients previously considered non-candidates, with poor responses in patients in whom dose reductions were used, and severe AEs in patients at standard doses. In the remaining patients, cTKIs and other agents (interferon, hydroxyurea, citarabine, busulfan) were used with poor responses. Patients who progressed to advanced stages had a dismal prognosis. With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, overall survival of the global cohort was 73%; 100% for intolerant patients, 71% for resistant patients and 25% for those who discontinue asciminib in accelerated/blastic phase.