David Arthur Stroud

Dr. David Arthur Stroud

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2015 in Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMohashin Pathan
Mohashin Pathan
SKShivakumar Keerthikumar
Shivakumar Keerthikumar
CAChing‐Seng Ang
Ching‐Seng Ang
LGLahiru Gangoda
Lahiru Gangoda
CQCamelia Y.J. Quek
Camelia Y.J. Quek
Suresh MathivananSuresh Mathivanan
Suresh Mathivanan

14 September 2016 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid Arthur Stroud
David Arthur Stroud
ESElliot E. Surgenor
Elliot E. Surgenor
LFLuke E. Formosa
Luke E. Formosa
BRBoris Reljic
Boris Reljic
AFAnn Frazier
Ann Frazier
MRMichael T. Ryan
Michael T. Ryan

1 June 2016 in Journal of Cell Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LOLaura D. Osellame
Laura D. Osellame
ASAbeer P. Singh
Abeer P. Singh
DSDavid Arthur Stroud
David Arthur Stroud
CPCatherine S. Palmer
Catherine S. Palmer
DSDiana Stojanovski
Diana Stojanovski
MRMichael T. Ryan
Michael T. Ryan
Cytosolic dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1, also known as DNM1L) is required for both mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission. Drp1-dependent division of these organelles is facilitated by a number of adaptor proteins at mitochondrial and peroxisomal surfaces. To investigate the interplay of these adaptor proteins, we used gene-editing technology to create a suite of cell lines lacking the adaptors MiD49 (also known as MIEF2), MiD51 (also known as MIEF1), Mff and Fis1. Increased mitochondrial connectivity was observed following loss of individual adaptors, and this was further enhanced following the combined loss of MiD51 and Mff. Moreover, loss of adaptors also conferred increased resistance of cells to intrinsic apoptotic stimuli, with MiD49 and MiD51 showing the more prominent role. Using a proximity-based biotin labeling approach, we found close associations between MiD51, Mff and Drp1, but not Fis1. Furthermore, we found that MiD51 can suppress Mff-dependent enhancement of Drp1 GTPase activity. Our data indicates that Mff and MiD51 regulate Drp1 in specific ways to promote mitochondrial fission.

1 December 2009 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNatalia Gebert
Natalia Gebert
AJAmit S. Joshi
Amit S. Joshi
SKStephan Kutik
Stephan Kutik
TBThomas Becker
Thomas Becker
MMMatthew McKenzie
Matthew McKenzie
NPNikolaus Pfanner
Nikolaus Pfanner

1 April 2018 in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LFLuke E. Formosa
Luke E. Formosa
MDMarris G. Dibley
Marris G. Dibley
DSDavid Arthur Stroud
David Arthur Stroud
MRMichael T. Ryan
Michael T. Ryan

1 September 2012 in Journal of Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RZRalf M. Zerbes
Ralf M. Zerbes
MBMaria Bohnert
Maria Bohnert
DSDavid Arthur Stroud
David Arthur Stroud
KMKarina von der Malsburg
Karina von der Malsburg
AKAnita Kram
Anita Kram
Martin Van Der LaanMartin Van Der Laan
Martin Van Der Laan
The mitochondrial inner membrane contains a large protein complex crucial for membrane architecture, the mitochondrial inner membrane organizing system (MINOS). MINOS is required for keeping cristae membranes attached to the inner boundary membrane via crista junctions and interacts with protein complexes of the mitochondrial outer membrane. To study if outer membrane interactions and maintenance of cristae morphology are directly coupled, we generated mutant forms of mitofilin/Fcj1 (formation of crista junction protein 1), a core component of MINOS. Mitofilin consists of a transmembrane anchor in the inner membrane and intermembrane space domains, including a coiled-coil domain and a conserved C-terminal domain. Deletion of the C-terminal domain disrupted the MINOS complex and led to release of cristae membranes from the inner boundary membrane, whereas the interaction of mitofilin with the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) and the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) were enhanced. Deletion of the coiled-coil domain also disturbed the MINOS complex and cristae morphology; however, the interactions of mitofilin with TOM and SAM were differentially affected. Finally, deletion of both intermembrane space domains disturbed MINOS integrity as well as interactions with TOM and SAM. Thus, the intermembrane space domains of mitofilin play distinct roles in interactions with outer membrane complexes and maintenance of MINOS and cristae morphology, demonstrating that MINOS contacts to TOM and SAM are not sufficient for the maintenance of inner membrane architecture.