Objective(s): The aim of this study was to explore community pharmacists’ views toward the antibiotics dispensing law that was enforced in May 2018 and bans the sale of antibiotics without a prescription in community pharmacy settings in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, the potential impact of the law enforcement on the sales of oral antibiotics in Saudi Arabia was also explored. Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2019 and March 2020 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A multistage sampling technique was used to recruit community pharmacists from different districts. Pharmacists who consented to participate and reported practicing prior to the law enforcement were interviewed about their views of the law using a 14-item newly developed questionnaire. The annual sales of oral antibiotics for the years of 2017, 2018, and 2019 were retrieved from the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) database. Results: Two hundred and eighty six pharmacists consented to participate and met the inclusion criteria. After the law enforcement, approximately 51% of the participants reported that the percentage of patients seeking antibiotics without a prescription is less than 25%. Moreover, the majority (87.41%) reported a drop in the sales of antibiotics. Additionally, about 90% of the participants believed that the rate of inappropriate use of antibiotics will decrease as a result of the law enforcement. About 41% of the participants reported that the law has negatively impacted their pharmacies’ profits. The sales of oral antibiotics have seen a 16.6% drop in the year of 2019 as compared to 2017. Conclusion: The antibiotics dispensing law is favorably perceived among community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia despite some concerns about its impact on their sales. Exploring different business models that delink the profits from the volume of antibiotics sales is necessary for this vital industry to thrive.
Background: Vaso–occlusive crises (VOCs) are acute and common painful complication of sickle cell disease (SCD), and are the main reason behind the frequent emergency department visits among SCD patients. Hydroxyurea (HU) is an old and commonly used medication that demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing the risk of VOCs and the incidence of hospitalization. Although multiple studies have examined the impact of HU on the rates of VOCs, few have explored its effectiveness among SCD patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This was a single–center retrospective cohort study in which the electronic medical records of patients with SCD who have not had any previous exposure to HU prior to the initiation of HU treatment for ≥12 months were recruited. Paired t–test was conducted to examine the difference in the rates of VOCs, and levels of hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet counts (PLT Ct) prior to the initiation of HU therapy and 12 months later. Multiple linear regression was conducted to examine whether age, gender, use of opioid analgesics, Hgb, HCT, and PLT Ct levels predict higher or lower rates of VOCs. Results: One hundred and fifty–six patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. About 51% of the patients were males, and their mean age was 12.69 years. The mean HU dosage was 16.52 mg/kg/day, and the mean reduction in the rate of VOCs was 1.36 events per patient per year (95% CI [1.03–1.70], p < 0.0001) after the initiation of HU. Females were more likely to have greater reduction in the rates of VOCs in comparison to their male counterparts (β–estimate = 12.85, 95% CI [0.759–24.93], p = 0.0374). Conclusion: The use of HU results in a significant reduction in the rates of VOCs and emergency department visits. Future studies with robust research designs should be conducted to further examine the impact of HU on VOCs, hospitalization, and length of stay as well as compare HU to other newly approved medications for SCD, such as crizanlizumab.
Background: Belimumab use for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been limited, in part due to its high acquisition cost relative to the standard of care (SoC) and the uncertainties about its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the cost and effectiveness of belimumab versus the SoC alone for the management of SLE using real-world data from the perspective of public healthcare payers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: Data were retrieved from a national prospective cohort of SLE, Saudi Arabia. Adult SLE patients (≥18 yrs.) treated with belimumab plus the SoC or the SoC alone for at least six months were recruited. The effectiveness was measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Unit costs for health services and prescription drugs were retrieved from the Saudi ministry of health. Nonparametric bootstrapping with inverse probability weighting was conducted to generate the 95% confidence limits for the cost and effectiveness. Results: A total of 15 patients on belimumab plus the SoC and 41 patients on the SoC alone met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were females (91.07%) with a mean age of 38 years. The mean difference in cost and SLEDAI-2K score reduction between belimumab versus the SoC were USD 5303.16 [95% CI: USD 2735.61–USD 7802.52] and 3.378 [95% CI: 1.769–6.831], respectively. Belimumab demonstrated better effectiveness but higher cost in 96% of the bootstrap cost-effectiveness distributions. Conclusion: Future studies should use more robust research designs and a larger sample size to confirm the findings of this study.
19 March 2026 in Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health
Background Polypharmacy is common among older adults and increases the risk of inappropriate medication use and adverse outcomes. Deprescribing is a potential strategy to optimize treatment. This study evaluated family physicians’ confidence and perceived barriers toward deprescribing in primary care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey from January 1 to December 31, 2024, among family physicians working in Riyadh primary care centers. Physicians with < 6 months of experience were excluded. Data were collected using paper-based or electronic questionnaires. Descriptive statistics summarized responses. Group comparisons used chi-square, Student’s t-test, and one-way ANOVA, as appropriate. Associations between confidence and attitude/barrier items were examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) with two-sided p-values (< 0.05 considered significant). A total of 321 physicians were included, representing 83.6% of the planned sample (321/384). Results Overall, 64.2% of physicians reported confidence in deprescribing, but only 28.0% reported deprescribing at least weekly. Commonly reported barriers included lack of solid evidence, time constraints, and concern about withdrawal effects. Confidence was positively associated with support for deprescribing preventive medications in patients with limited life expectancy (r = 0.259, p < 0.001), willingness to deprescribe medications initiated by another physician (r = 0.508, p < 0.001), and perceived ease of motivating patients/caregivers (r = 0.506, p < 0.001). Conclusion Family physicians in Riyadh reported substantial confidence in deprescribing, yet regular implementation was limited, indicating a confidence–practice gap. Addressing key barriers through practical guidance, workflow support, and targeted training may improve deprescribing uptake and medication safety for older adults.