Ten years have passed since Latvia became a Member State of the EU in 2004. As a result European regulations, including those related to rare diseases and orphan drugs, have been applied to Latvian legislative system. Orphan diseases have been recognized as a priority area for action in the public health system, though there are significant differences in the national healthcare services for rare diseases among the EU States. This study aims to determine situation in the field of rare diseases in Latvia and compare it with other European countries. We used the national plan for rare diseases, EUCERD reports, Orphanet data, Latvian and European regulations, publicly available data from the state agencies, and directly contacted drug manufacturers and wholesalers. National plan for rare diseases was developed and approved in 2013. Although there are no official designated centers of expertise as well as no specific register for rare diseases. Newborns are screened for only two disorders: phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. Currently 34 orphan drugs are available on Latvian market. Three medicines (8.8%) are included in the reimbursement drug list, all indicated for Ph + CML. 15 drugs (44.1%) were reimbursed within the framework of individual reimbursement system, and five drugs (14.7%) were provided within the program of medicinal treatment of rare diseases in children. Majority of orphan drugs authorized in the EU are not available in Latvia, moreover those drugs that are available are often not accessible because they are insufficiently reimbursed. Besides, approval of the national plan might be an important step towards improving situation in the field of rare diseases.

Patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery have increased risk of death and myocardial infarction (MI), which may be due to unsuspected (silent) coronary ischaemia. The aim was to determine whether pre-operative diagnosis of silent ischaemia using coronary computed tomography (CT) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) can facilitate multidisciplinary care to reduce post-operative death and MI, and improve survival. This was a single centre prospective study with historic controls. Patients with no cardiac symptoms undergoing lower extremity surgical revascularisation with pre-operative coronary CTA-FFR_CT testing were compared with historic controls with standard pre-operative testing. Silent coronary ischaemia was defined as FFR_CT ≤ 0.80 distal to coronary stenosis with FFR_CT ≤ 0.75 indicating severe ischaemia. End points included cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, and all cause death through one year follow up. There were no statistically significant differences between CT angiography (CTA-FFR_CT) (n = 135) and control (n = 135) patients with regard to age (66 ± 8 years), sex, comorbidities, or surgery performed. Coronary CTA showed ≥ 50% stenosis in 70% of patients with left main stenosis in 7%. FFR_CT revealed silent coronary ischaemia in 68% of patients with severe ischaemia in 53%. The status of coronary ischaemia was unknown in the controls. At 30 days, CV death and MI in the CTA-FFR_CT group were not statistically significantly different from controls (0% vs. 3.7% [p = .060] and 0.7% vs. 5.2% [p = .066], respectively). Post-operative coronary revascularisation was performed in 54 patients to relieve silent ischaemia (percutaneous coronary intervention in 47, coronary artery bypass graft in seven). At one year, CTA-FFR_CT patients had fewer CV deaths (0.7% vs. 5.9%; p = .036) and MIs (2.2% vs. 8.1%; p = .028) and improved survival (p = .018) compared with controls. Pre-operative diagnosis of silent coronary ischaemia in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularisation surgery can facilitate multidisciplinary patient care with selective post-operative coronary revascularisation. This strategy reduced post-operative death and MI and improved one year survival compared with standard care.

Purpose: To report the initial clinical results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the low-profile (14-F) Altura Endograft System, which features a double “D-shaped” stent design with suprarenal fixation and modular iliac components that are deployed from distal to proximal. Methods: From 2011 to 2015, 90 patients (mean age 72.8±8.3 years; 79 men) with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; mean diameter 53.8±5.7 mm) were treated at 10 clinical sites in 2 prospective, controlled clinical studies using the Altura endograft. Outcomes evaluated included mortality, major adverse events (MAEs: all-cause death, stroke, paraplegia, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, bowel ischemia, and blood loss ≥1000 mL), and clinical success (freedom from procedure-related death, type I/III endoleak, migration, thrombosis, and reintervention). Results: Endografts were successfully implanted in 89 (99%) patients; the single failure was due to delivery system malfunction before insertion in the early-generation device. One (1%) patient died and 4 patients underwent reinterventions (1 type I endoleak, 2 iliac limb stenoses, and 1 endograft occlusion) within the first 30 days. During a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range 11.5–50.9), there were no aneurysm ruptures, surgical conversions, or AAA-related deaths. The cumulative MAE rates were 3% (3/89) at 6 months and 7% (6/89) at 1 year. Two patients underwent coil embolization of type II endoleaks at 6.5 months and 2.2 years, respectively. Clinical success was 94% (84/89) at 30 days, 98% (85/87) at 6 months, and 99% (82/83) at 1 year. Conclusion: Early results suggest that properly selected AAA patients can be safely treated using the Altura Endograft System with favorable midterm outcome. Thus, further clinical investigation is warranted to evaluate the role of this device in the treatment of AAA.

Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) are the primary cause of death after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We sought to determine whether selective coronary revascularization of CEA patients with asymptomatic coronary ischemia can reduce the risk of MACEs, myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death after endarterectomy compared with CEA patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care. Two groups of patients with no cardiac history or symptoms undergoing elective CEA were compared. Group I: patients enrolled in a prospective study of noninvasive preoperative cardiac evaluation using coronary computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) to detect asymptomatic (silent) coronary ischemia with selective postoperative coronary revascularization. Group II: matched Control patients with standard preoperative cardiac evaluation and no postoperative coronary revascularization. Lesion-specific coronary ischemia in group I was defined as FFR_CT ≤ 0.80 distal to coronary stenosis with severe ischemia defined as FFR_CT ≤ 0.75. End points included MACEs, cardiac death, MI, cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke, and all-cause death through 3-year follow-up. Group I (n = 100) and group II (n = 100) patients were similar in age (68 vs 67 years), gender (65% vs 62% male), comorbidities, and indications for CEA (53% vs 48% symptomatic carotid stenosis). In group I, FFR_CT analysis revealed lesion-specific coronary ischemia in 57% of patients, severe coronary ischemia in 44%, left main ischemia in 7%, and multivessel ischemia in 28%. The status of coronary ischemia in group II was unknown. CEA was performed without complications in both groups, and all patients received optimal postoperative medical therapy. In group I, elective coronary revascularization was performed in 33 patients (27 percutaneous coronary intervention; 6 coronary artery bypass grafting) 1 to 3 months after CEA. Group II patients had no elective coronary revascularization. During 3-year follow-up, compared with group II, group I patients had fewer MACEs (4% vs 17%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.63], P = .004), fewer cardiac deaths (2% vs 9%, HR: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.04-0.95], P = .030), fewer MIs (3% vs 17%, HR: 0.16 [95% CI: 0.05-0.54], P = .001), and fewer CV deaths (2% vs 12%, HR: 0.16 [95% CI: 0.004-0.07], P = .009). There were no significant differences in the rates of stroke or all-cause death. Preoperative diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia with selective coronary revascularization after CEA may reduce the risk of MACEs, cardiac death, MI, and CV death during 3-year follow-up compared with CEA patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care.