The cultivation of rice is one of the main sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to continuously flooded irrigation (CF), which demands large volumes of water. As an alternative solution, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation has been developed as a water-saving strategy. This study was conducted at the Experimental Agricultural Station (EEA) in Vista, Florida, in the Lambayeque region located on the northern coast of Peru. Thus, it was analyzed the effect of AWD irrigation at different depths (5, 10, and less than 20 cm below the surface) compared to CF control on methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and rice grain yield. AWD treatments reduced CH₄ emissions by 84% to 99% but increased N₂O emissions by 66% to 273%. In terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), the AWD₁₀ treatment demonstrated a 77% reduction and a Water Use Efficiency (WUE) of 0.96, affecting only a 2% decrease in rice grain yield, which ranged between 11.85 and 14.01 ${\mathrm{t} \mathrm{ha}}^{-1}$. Likewise, this study provides sufficient evidence for the adoption of AWD irrigation as a strategy for the efficient use of water resources and the mitigation of GHG emissions in rice cultivation in the study area, compared to continuous flooded irrigation.

Global warming is influenced by an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration in the atmosphere. Consequently, Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) is the main factor that influences the exchange of carbon (C) between the atmosphere and the soil. As a result, agricultural ecosystems are a potential carbon dioxide (CO₂) sink, particularly rice paddies (Oryza sativa). Therefore, a static chamber with a portable CO₂ analyzer was designed and implemented for three rice plots to monitor CO₂ emissions. Furthermore, a weather station was installed to record meteorological variables. The vegetative, reproductive, and maturation phases of the crop lasted 95, 35, and 42 days post-sowing (DPS), respectively. In total, the crop lasted 172 DPS. Diurnal NEE had the highest CO₂ absorption capacity at 10:00 a.m. for the tillering stage (82 and 89 DPS), floral primordium (102 DPS), panicle initiation (111 DPS), and flowering (126 DPS). On the other hand, the maximum CO₂ emission at 82, 111, and 126 DPS occurred at 6:00 p.m. At 89 and 102 DPS, it occurred at 4:00 and 6:00 a.m., respectively. NEE in the vegetative stage was −25 $\mathsf{\mu }\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}2 {\mathrm{m}}^2 {\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and in the reproductive stage, it was −35 $\mathsf{\mu }\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}2 {\mathrm{m}}^2 {\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, indicating the highest absorption capacity of the plots. The seasonal dynamics of NEE were mainly controlled by the air temperature inside the chamber (Tc) (R = −0.69), the relative humidity inside the chamber (RHc) (R = −0.66), and net radiation (R_n) (R = −0.75). These results are similar to previous studies obtained via chromatographic analysis and eddy covariance (EC), which suggests that the portable analyzer could be an alternative for CO₂ monitoring.