Nonedible materials such as agricultural wastes can serve as sources of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) effective against bacterial plant pathogens. In this study, thirteen agricultural samples were collected and their protein hydrolysates obtained using pepsin. Peptides smaller than 3 kDa were purified by reverse-phase chromatography, cation exchange chromatography, and pI-based fractionation and tested for activity against plant pathogenic bacteria at each step. Active peptides were then analyzed for putative mechanisms using nanoLC–MS/MS and the Mascot program. Ultimately, eight candidate peptides originating from bagasse were selected and chemically synthesized for a comparative study of growth inhibition in plant pathogenic bacteria and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs). Three synthesized peptides exhibited a potent activity against plant pathogenic bacteria while also supporting the growth of PGPRs. Proteomics analysis revealed the peptides PQLAVF (Pro-Gln-Leu-Ala-Val-Phe) and MDRFL (Met-Asp-Arg-Phe-Leu) to act against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae via membrane-active mechanisms, while peptide VQLMNSL (Val-Gln-Leu-Met-Asn-Ser-Leu) acted against Pectobacterium carotovorum and Agrobacterium rhizogenes through intracellular-active mechanisms. Further study remains necessary to customize peptides by amino acid substitution not only for a higher effective activity against these and other critical pathogens, but also for a higher stability of peptides in critical condition when applied in industrial processes in the future.

Nonedible agricultural wastes (agricultural wastes, agro-industrial wastes, and fishery wastes) were chosen as potential sources of antimicrobial peptides and evaluated for antibacterial efficiency against human pathogens. Specifically, protein hydrolysates were first obtained by hydrolysis with pepsin. Filtrated peptides smaller than 3 kDa were then purified by C18 reversed-phase chromatography, cation exchange chromatography, and off-gel fractionation. NanoLC-MS/MS was used to investigate the amino acid sequences of active peptide candidates. Five candidate peptides were finally chosen for chemical synthesis and evaluation of growth inhibition against human pathogenic bacteria. Two synthetic peptides from bagasse, NLWSNEINQDMAEF (Asn-Leu-Trp-Ser-Asn-Glu-Ile-Asn-Gln-Asp-Met-Ala-Glu-Phe) and VSNCL (Val-Ser-Asn-Cys-Leu), showed the most potent antibacterial activity against three pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Burkholderia cepacia. The antibacterial mechanisms of these peptides were then examined using shotgun proteomics, which revealed their effects to involve both intracellular-active and membrane-active mechanisms. Further investigation and modification of peptides are needed to increase the efficiency of these peptides against human pathogens.

Plant pathogens are a significant and urgent issue mainly in agricultural countries. Disease control using chemicals and antibiotics can cause widespread negative impacts, particularly on fresh vegetables and agricultural raw materials. These could affect national food insecurity. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are one of the effective solutions because of theirs remarkable antimicrobial action mostly on bacteria and fungi, the primary causes of plant-infected diseases. AMPs are present in common living things, both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, these are the natural defenses in organisms. Each type of AMPs exhibits distinct microbial targets through various mechanisms. Some AMPs kill microbes in a few seconds after contact with target cells, some AMPs stimulate the antibiotic effects, while some AMPs exhibit superior results than antibiotics. AMPs work by two different mechanisms: the direct bactericidal mechanism that involves interaction with the bacterial membrane and results in cell lysis, and the indirect bactericidal mechanism that involves penetration without causing cell lysis but inhibiting the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins. Current AMPs research reveals promising outcomes at the laboratory level. Further studies will focus on the actual environment and the outbreak area respectively.