Background and Objectives: he treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients often presents a major surgical challenge because of age-related bone loss. In such patients, the scarcity of healthy makes autologous grafting techniques hard to perform. On the one hand, clinicians’ fear of possible infections limits using bone substitute materials (BSM). On the other hand, BSM is limitless and spares patients another surgery to harvest autologous material. Materials and Methods: To address the aptness of BSM in geriatric patients, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 64 years who visited our clinic between the years 2011–2018. The study assessed postoperative complications clinically and healing results radiologically. The study included 83 patients with bone defects at the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with BSM based on either nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group (empty defect, ED) without the void filling with a BSM was also included. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (71.7%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No difference was found between the BSM groups in infection occurrence (p = 1.0). Although not statistically significant, the BSM groups showed a lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.09) compared with the ED group. Relative risk (RR) of complications was 32.64% less in the BSM groups compared with the ED group. The additional beneficial outcome of BSM was demonstrated by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT). The calculation showed that with every six patients treated, at least one complication could be avoided. Radiological assessment of bone healing showed significant improvement in the bridging of the defect zone (p < 0.001) when BSM was used. Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, the study showed that BSM could support bone healing and does not present an infection risk in geriatric patients. The NNT calculation indicates a wider potential benefit of BSM.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients over 50 years has traditionally been considered controversial due to concerns about graft failure, limited healing potential, and the risk of degenerative progression. However, with increasing life expectancy and higher physical activity in older adults, the demand for ACLR in this population has grown, and the role of graft selection remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of graft choice on clinical outcomes, graft survival, and re-rupture rates after ACLR in patients aged 50 years and older. It was hypothesized that (1) ACLR in this population would result in low re-rupture rates and satisfactory functional outcomes, and (2) no significant differences would be observed among different graft types. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed from database inception to July 20, 2025, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies included skeletally mature patients ≥50 years undergoing primary ACLR with different grafts (hamstring tendon [HT], bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], quadriceps tendon [QT], allograft, or synthetic). Outcomes of interest included graft re-rupture, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool results, and subgroup analyses were performed by graft type. Twenty-one studies including a total of 1093 patients were analyzed. The overall weighted mean age at surgery was 55.88 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6-57.2). The majority of patients underwent HT reconstruction (n = 744-68.1%), followed by QT (n = 142-12.9%), BPTB (n = 81-7.4%), allograft (n = 110-10.1%), and synthetic grafts (ligament augmentation and reconstruction system [LARS]; n = 16-1.5%). The overall re-rupture rate was 0.3% (95% CI, 0.0-1.4), with no statistically significant differences among graft types (p > 0.05), ranging from 0.0% for BPTB/QT to 1.8% for allograft/LARS. The pooled mean Lysholm score was 91.2 (95% CI, 89.5-92.9), and the pooled mean IKDC score was 81.4 (95% CI, 77.9-84.9), showing no statistically significant graft-related differences. Odds ratio analysis confirmed no increased risk of re-rupture across graft types. ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years and older is associated with excellent functional outcomes and very low re-rupture rates. No statistically significant differences were observed among graft types. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to limited data for some graft categories and the heterogeneity of the available evidence. Graft selection should be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise rather than chronological age. Systematic review and meta-analysis; level of evidence, III.

When bone substitutes materials are used, the increased risk of infection due to the none-autogenic graft is often discussed. The treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients, often with osteoporotic bone, often presents major challenges to surgery. Bone substitutes materials are available indefinitely without the risk of additional surgery in each patient. Can bone substitutes materials be used without hesitation in the geriatric patient?Eighty-three patients suffered traumatic fractures of the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with bone substitute material based on nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group without the void filling with a bone graft substitute (void defects, ED) was studied. All patients over the age of 64 years were retrospectively evaluated for complications and radiological outcomes. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (68.9%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No differences in infections were found when comparing the groups (p=1.0). retrospectively evaluated. The KEM group had a nonsignificantly lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p=0.09). A relative risk (RR) reduction of complications of 32.64% was observed when bone grafting material was used. The NNT for the prevention of complications was 5.99. When bone healing was assessed by radiological images, some follow-up studies showed significant differences in fracture bridging (p<0.001).Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, bone substitutes materials can support the healing process in geriatric patients without relevant disadvantages. With an NNT of 6 regarding complications, many patients could benefit from bone graft augmentation. No increased infection rate was observed.

The aim of this study was to establish a consensus-based classification of postoperative events following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), clearly distinguishing no complication/normal clinical course, minor complication, major complication, and failure, using a structured Delphi methodology among international experts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. A three-round modified Delphi process was conducted involving international high-volume ACL surgeons. An initial set of statements addressing potential postoperative events after ACLR was developed by a working group based on clinical expertise and contemporary literature. Panelists classified each statement as no complication/normal clinical course, minor complication, major complication, or failure. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement within a single category. Statements reaching consensus were retained, whereas non-consensus statements were revised and re-evaluated in subsequent rounds. Thirty-nine experts completed the first and second Delphi rounds, and 30 (76.9%) completed the third round. The initial 52 statements were expanded to 67 in round two and refined to 46 in round three. Consensus was achieved for 14 statements (26.9%) in round one, 21 statements (31.3%) in round two, and 20 statements (43.5%) in round three. Overall, consensus was reached for 55 statements, forming the final classification framework. The panel clearly distinguished graft failure-defined as graft insufficiency or symptomatic instability-from major complications requiring surgical intervention or associated with substantial morbidity, and from minor complications or expected postoperative findings. Notably, traumatic graft rupture following a clearly documented new injury was not considered a postoperative complication. This international Delphi consensus establishes a standardized and clinically meaningful classification of postoperative events following ACLR. By clearly distinguishing no complication, minor complication, major complication, and failure, this framework provides a shared language that may improve consistency in outcome reporting, facilitate comparison across studies, and enhance the interpretability of clinical research and registry data. V, expert consensus.

When bone substitutes materials are used, the increased risk of infection due to the none-autogenic graft is often discussed. The treatment of large bone defects in geriatric patients, often with osteoporotic bone, often presents major challenges to surgery. Bone substitutes materials are available indefinitely without the risk of additional surgery in each patient. Can bone substitutes materials be used without hesitation in the geriatric patient? Eighty-three patients suffered traumatic fractures of the distal radius, proximal humerus, and proximal tibia. The defect zones were filled with bone substitute material based on nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or calcium phosphate (CP). For comparison, a reference group without the void filling with a bone graft substitute (void defects, ED) was studied. All patients over the age of 64 years were retrospectively evaluated for complications and radiological outcomes. Results: 106 patients sustained traumatic fractures of the distal radius (68.9%), proximal humerus (5.7%), and proximal tibia (22.6%). No differences in infections were found when comparing the groups (p=1.0). retrospectively evaluated. The KEM group had a nonsignificantly lower rate of pseudarthrosis (p=0.09). A relative risk (RR) reduction of complications of 32.64% was observed when bone grafting material was used. The NNT for the prevention of complications was 5.99. When bone healing was assessed by radiological images, some follow-up studies showed significant differences in fracture bridging (p<0.001). Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, bone substitutes materials can support the healing process in geriatric patients without relevant disadvantages. With an NNT of 6 regarding complications, many patients could benefit from bone graft augmentation. No increased infection rate was observed.