Background: COVID-19 presents with a wide spectrum of clinical and radiological manifestations, including pleural effusion. The prevalence and prognostic impact of pleural effusion are still not entirely clear. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study including a population of consecutive patients admitted to the University Hospital of Cisanello (Pisa) from March 2020 to January 2021 with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab and SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia. The patients were divided into two populations based on the presence (n = 150) or absence (n = 515) of pleural effusion on chest CT scan, excluding patients with pre-existing pleural effusion. We collected laboratory data (hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin), worst PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio as an index of respiratory gas exchange impairment, the extent of interstitial involvement related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and data on intensity of care, length of stay and outcome (discharge or death). Results: The prevalence of pleural effusion was 23%. Patients with pleural effusion showed worse gas exchange (p < 0.001), longer average hospital stay (p < 0.001), need for more health care resources (p < 0.001) and higher mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients without pleural effusion. By multivariate analysis, pleural effusion was found to be an independent negative prognostic factor compared with other variables such as increased C-reactive protein, greater extent of pneumonia and older age. Pleural effusion was present at the first CT scan in most patients (68%). Conclusions: Pleural effusion associated with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is a relatively frequent finding that is confirmed to be a negative prognostic factor. Identifying early prognostic factors in an endemic-prone disease such as COVID-19 is necessary to optimize its clinical management. Further clinical studies aimed at better characterizing pleural effusion in these patients will be appropriate in order to clarify its pathogenetic role.

Background: Pulmonary infarction (PI) is the result of the occlusion of distal pulmonary arteries resulting in damage to downstream lung areas that become ischemic, hemorrhagic, or necrotic, and it is often a complication of an underlying condition such as pulmonary embolism (PE). Since in most of cases it is located peripherally, lung ultrasound (LUS) can be a good evaluation tool. The typical radiological features of PI are well-known; however, there are limited data on its sonographic characteristics and its evolution. Methods: The aim of this study is to evaluate, using LUS, a convenience sample of patients with acute PE with computed tomography (CT) consolidation findings consistent with PI. Patients’ clinical characteristics were collected and LUS findings at baseline and their short-term progression was assessed. LUS was performed within 72 h of PE diagnosis (T0) and repeated after one (T1) and four weeks (T2). Each procedure started with a focused examination of the areas of lesions based on CT findings, followed by an exploration of the other posterior and lateral lung fields. The convex probe was used for initial evaluation integrating LUS evaluation with the linear one was employed for smaller and more superficial lesions and when appropriate. Color Doppler mode was added to study vascularization. Results: From June to October 2023, 14 consecutive patients were enrolled at the Respiratory Unit of the University Hospital of Pisa. The main population characteristics included the absence of respiratory failure and prognostic high-risk PE (100%), the absence of significant comorbidities (79%), and the presence of typical symptoms, such as chest pain (57%) and dyspnea (50%). The average number of consolidations per patient was 1.4 ± 0.6. Follow-up LUS showed the disappearance of some consolidations and some morphological changes in the remaining lesions: the presence of hypoechoic consolidation with a central hyperechoic area (“bubbly consolidation”) was more typical at T1 while the presence of a small pleural effusion often persisted both at T1 and T2. A decrease in wedge/triangular-shaped consolidations was observed (82% at T0, 67% at T1, 24% at T2), as was an increase in elongated shapes, representing a residual pleural thickening over time (9% at T0, 13% at T1, 44% at T2). A reduction in size was also observed by comparing the mean diameter, long axis, and short axis measurements of each consolidation at the three different studied time points: the average of the short axes and the median of the mean diameters showed a statistically significant reduction after four weeks. Additionally, a correlation between lesion size and pleuritic pain was described, although it did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusions: Patients’ clinical characteristics and ultrasound features are consistent with previous studies studying PI at PE diagnosis. Most consolidations detected by LUS change over time regarding size and form, but a minority of them do not differ. LUS is a safe and non-invasive exam that could help to improve patients’ clinical approach in emergency rooms as well as medical and pulmonology settings, clinically contextualized for cases of chest pain and dyspnea. Future studies could expand the morphological study of PI.