Mattia Longoni

Dr. Mattia Longoni

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 May 2025 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
MAMario De Angelis
Mario De Angelis
PZPaolo Zaurito
Paolo Zaurito
GTGiovanni Tremolada
Giovanni Tremolada
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini
Objective: To report real‐world rates of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression within a European multicentre cohort with detailed information on intravesical instillation courses, as contemporary data on oncological outcomes in NMIBC are limited.Patients and methods: A total of 1918 patients with NMIBC treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) were retrospectively identified from six tertiary‐referral European centres (2015–2022). Patients were stratified according to European Association of Urology 2021 criteria into low‐ (LR), intermediate‐ (IR), high‐ (HR) and very high‐risk (VHR) categories. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models addressing 5‐year rates of high‐grade (HG) recurrence and progression were fitted. Sensitivity analyses focused on patients receiving intravesical instillations and tested for the effect of adequate course (Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin: five or more induction + two or more maintenance instillations; mitomycin C: complete induction + ≥11 maintenance instillations).Results: Of all NMIBC patients identified, 467 (24.3%) were LR vs 582 (30.3%) IR vs 739 (38.5%) HR vs 130 (6.8%) VHR. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up after TURBT was 26 (12–46) months. The 5‐year HG recurrence rates were 7.2% in LR vs 17.3% in IR vs 26.7% in HR vs 30.9% in VHR patients, resulting in a three‐, five‐ and seven‐fold higher risk of IR, HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). The 5‐year progression rates were 3.9% in LR vs 5.2% in IR vs 13.6% in HR vs 31.6% in VHR patients, resulting in a six‐ and nine‐fold higher risk for HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). In all, 1001 (52.2%) patients underwent intravesical instillations. Those receiving adequate instillation course (244/1001 [24.3%]) had lower HG‐recurrence (hazard ratio 0.3, P < 0.001) and progression (hazard ratio 0.2, P = 0.001) risk.Conclusions: Patients with HR/VHR NMIBC face significantly higher HG recurrence and progression risks. While tailored treatment strategies are needed, adherence to adequate instillation course remains crucial for optimising oncological outcomes.

15 April 2024 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
CRChiara Re
Chiara Re
GRGiuseppe Rosiello
Giuseppe Rosiello
LNLuigi Nocera
Luigi Nocera
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini
Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of 18F‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ d ‐glucose (18F‐FDG) positron emission tomograpy (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in nodal staging before radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for bladder cancer (BCa). Materials and Methods: This analysis was based on a cohort of 199 BCa patients undergoing RC and bilateral PLND between 2015 and 2022. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) was administered after oncological evaluation. All patients received preoperative 18F‐FDG PET/CT to assess extravesical disease. Point estimates for true negative, false negative, false positive, true positive, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of conventional imaging and PET/CT were calculated. Subgroup analysis in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was performed. Results: At preoperative evaluation, 30 patients (15.1%) had 48 suspicious nodal spots on 18F‐FDG PET/CT. At RC and bilateral PLND, a total of 4871 lymph nodes (LNs) were removed with 237 node metastases corresponding to 126 different regions. Pathological node metastases were found in 17/30 (57%) vs 39/169 patients (23%) with suspicious vs negative preoperative 18F‐FDG PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.30, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.57, NPV = 0.77, accuracy = 0.74). On per‐region analysis including 1367 nodal regions, LN involvement was found in 19/48 (39%) vs 105/1319 (8%) suspicious vs negative regions at PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.15, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.40, NPV = 0.92, ACC = 0.90). Similar results were observed for patients receiving NAC ( n = 44, 32.1%) and NAI ( n = 93, 67.9% [per‐patient: sensitivity = 0.36, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.59, NPV = 0.80, accuracy = 0.77; per‐region: sensitivity = 0.12, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.32, NPV = 0.93, ACC = 0.91]). Study limitations include its retrospective design and limited patient numbers. Conclusions: In eight out of 10 patients with negative preoperative 18F‐FDG PET/CT, pN0 disease was confirmed at final pathology. No differences were found based on NAC vs NAI treatment. These findings suggest that 18F‐FDG PET/CT could play a role in the preoperative evaluation of nodal metastases in BCa patients, although its cost‐effectiveness is uncertain.

28 May 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMara Bacchiani
Mara Bacchiani
VSVincenzo Salamone
Vincenzo Salamone
EMEleana Massaro
Eleana Massaro
ASAlessandro Sandulli
Alessandro Sandulli
RMRiccardo Mariottini
Riccardo Mariottini
OGon behalf of European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group
on behalf of European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group
Introduction: Lymph node (LN) involvement is a crucial determinant of prognosis for patients with bladder cancer, and an accurate staging is of utmost importance to better identify timely and appropriate therapeutic strategies. To improve the accuracy of LN detection, as an alternative to traditional methods such as CT or MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT has been increasingly used. 18F-FDG PET/CT is also used in post-treatment restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this narrative literature review is to provide an overview of the current evidence on the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of bladder cancer, with a particular focus on its sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LN metastasis. We aim to provide clinicians with a better understanding of 18F-FDG PET/CT’s potential benefits and limitations in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We designed a narrative review starting from a wide search in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases, selecting full-text English articles that have examined the sensibility and specificity of PET/CT for nodal staging or restaging after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with bladder cancer. The extracted data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. The results are presented in a tabular format, with a summary of the main findings of each study. Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria: fourteen studies evaluated 18F-FDG PET/CT for nodal staging, six studies examined its accuracy for restaging after neoadjuvant therapy, and three studies evaluated both applications. To date, the use of F-18 FDG PET/TC for detection of LN metastasis in bladder cancer is controversial and uncertain: some studies showed low accuracy rates, but over the years other studies have reported evidence of high sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/CT provides important incremental staging and restaging information that can potentially influence clinical management in MIBC patients. Standardization and development of a scoring system are necessary for its wider adoption. Well-designed randomized controlled trials in larger populations are necessary to provide consistent recommendations and consolidate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of bladder cancer patients.

6 March 2025 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
NPNatali Rodriguez Peñaranda
Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
AMAndrea Marmiroli
Andrea Marmiroli
FFFabian Falkenbach
Fabian Falkenbach
QLQuynh Chi Le
Quynh Chi Le
PKPierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz

13 April 2023 in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALuca Afferi
Luca Afferi
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini
GGGiorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia
AMAlicia K. Morgans
Alicia K. Morgans
Francesco EspertoFrancesco Esperto
Francesco Esperto

15 March 2023 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STStefano Tappero
Stefano Tappero
EVEnrico Vecchio
Enrico Vecchio
EPErika Palagonia
Erika Palagonia
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
MMMarco Martiriggiano
Marco Martiriggiano
Paolo Dell'OglioPaolo Dell'Oglio
Paolo Dell'Oglio