Background: Preseptal and orbital cellulitis are two types of infection surrounding the orbital septum with very different potential outcomes. Our aim was to describe key differential features of both conditions, laying special emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital over a 15-year period (January 2004–October 2019) was conducted. We included 198 patients with preseptal and 45 with orbital cellulitis. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine the available information. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between patients with preseptal and orbital cellulitis regarding age (3.9 ± 2.14 vs. 7.5 ± 4.24 years), presence of fever (51.5% vs. 82.2%), and preexisting sinusitis (2% vs. 77.8%) (all P < 0.001). Diplopia, ophthalmoplegia and proptosis were only present in orbital cellulitis (P < 0.001). Median values of C-reactive protein were significantly higher among children with orbital involvement [136.35 mg/L (IQR 74.08–168.98) vs. 17.85 (IQR 6.33–50.10), P < 0.0001]. A CRP>120 mg/L cut-off point for orbital cellulitis was obtained. Early CT scans were performed in 75.6% of suspected orbital cellulitis and helped detecting complications at an early stage. Abscesses were revealed in 70.6% of cases, especially medial subperiosteal abscesses (58.8%). All patients received intravenous antibiotics, whereas corticosteroids were preferred in patients with orbital implication (8.6% vs. 73.3%, P < 0.001). Only 26.7% of patients required additional surgery. Conclusions: Clinical presentation and CRP are extremely sensitive for differential diagnosis of preseptal and orbital cellulitis. Prompt initiation of intravenous antibiotics is mandatory and can prevent surgical procedures even in cases with incipient abscesses.

Antibiotics are frequently prescribed to children with pneumonia, although viruses are responsible for most cases. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) on antibiotic use. We conducted a prospective study of children under 14 years of age admitted for suspected viral pneumonia, from October 2019 to June 2022 (except March–November 2020). A mPCR respiratory panel (FilmArray^® 2plus, bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) was performed within 72 h of admission. Patients with positive reverse transcription PCR for respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, or SARS-CoV-2 were excluded. We compared the patients with historical controls (2017–2018) who had suspected viral pneumonia but did not undergo an aetiological study. We included 64 patients and 50 controls, with a median age of 26 months. The respiratory panel detected viral pathogens in 55 patients (88%), including 17 (31%) with co-infections. Rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 26) and human metapneumovirus (n = 22) were the most common pathogens, followed by adenovirus and parainfluenza (n = 10). There were no statistically significant differences in the total antibiotic consumption (83% of cases and 86% of controls) or antibiotics given for ≥72 h (58% vs. 66%). Antibiotics were prescribed in 41% of the cases and 72% of the controls at discharge (p = 0.001). Ampicillin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic among the patients (44% vs. 18% for controls, p = 0.004), while azithromycin was the most commonly prescribed among the controls (19% vs. 48% for patients and controls, respectively; p = 0.001). Our findings underscore the need for additional interventions alongside molecular diagnosis to reduce antibiotic usage in paediatric community-acquired pneumonia.

Viral respiratory infections (VRIs) in very low birthweight infants can be associated with high rates of morbidity. The COVID-19 pandemic has exerted a strong impact on viral circulation. The purpose of this study is to report on VRIs during NICU admission in infants below 32 weeks’ gestation and compare data collected between the pre-and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods. A prospective surveillance study was conducted at a tertiary NICU between April 2016 and June 2022. The COVID-19 post-pandemic period was established as being from March 2020 onwards. Respiratory virus detection was performed by real-time multiplex PCR assays in nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs). A total of 366 infants were enrolled. There were no statistical differences between periods regarding infants’ birth weight, gestational age, gender distribution, or rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Among the 1589 NPA collected during the pre-COVID-19 period, 8.9% were positive, and among the 1147 NPA collected during the post-pandemic period, only 3% were positive (p < 0.005). The type of viruses detected did not differ according to the study period (pre-COVID19 vs. post-COVID-19): rhinovirus (49.5% vs. 37.5%), adenovirus (22.6% vs. 25%), and human coronavirus (12.9% vs. 16.7%). SARS-CoV-2 was only detected in one patient. In conclusion, the viral profile causing VRI during the pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 era was similar. However, the total number of VRI dropped significantly, most probably due to the global increase in infection prevention measures.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant public health threat, causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and severe complications in children. Virulence factors such as Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) enhance its pathogenicity. This study investigates the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance and PVL production of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections among children. Methods: A nationwide multicenter retrospective study was conducted on children under 18 years diagnosed with CA-MRSA infections in Spain between 2018 and 2020. Positive MRSA cultures were obtained from biological samples within the first 48 hours of hospital or primary care contact and analyzed for antibiotic susceptibility and PVL production. Epidemiological, clinical and microbiological data were described and compared with previous colonization data. Statistical analyses, including multivariate logistic regression, were performed to identify factors associated with infection. Results: A total of 252 children with CA-MRSA infections were included, with a median age of 5.5 years (interquartile ranges: 2–10). SSTIs accounted for 89.3% of cases, and 23.6% required hospitalization. Migrant status (52.5%) and prior SSTIs (39.1%) were significantly associated with MRSA infection (P < 0.05). MRSA strains causing infection exhibited high resistance to ciprofloxacin (32.2%) and clindamycin (18.3%). No differences in antibiotic susceptibility were observed between strains causing infection and colonization. Reinfection occurred in 21% of cases, despite 45.3% undergoing decolonization. PVL genes were detected in 76.9% of MRSA strains, and were significantly more frequent in infection compared to colonization (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Migrant status and PVL toxin production are significant risk factors for MRSA infections. The high prevalence of antibiotic resistance highlights the importance of tailoring empirical treatment strategies based on local resistance patterns.

There are few data on yellow fever (YF) and hepatitis A (HA) off-label vaccination. Given the rising trend of travel to endemic countries, there is a growing necessity to broaden vaccination coverage among the pediatric population. For this reason, we aim to assess the adverse effects associated with off-label vaccination, with the ultimate purpose of expanding the vaccine spectrum. We analyzed ambispectively ninety-four children under 12 months of age who received YF or HA off-label vaccines. The YF vaccine was administered to children aged 6–9 months and those allergic to eggs (with a prior negative prick test and no history of anaphylaxis), while the HA vaccine was given to children aged 6–12 months. Overall, 71 (75%) were vaccinated against YF, and 57 (60%) against HA; 34 against both. All of them fulfilled off-label vaccination criteria. No immediate adverse effects (AEs) were reported. Mild common AEs (diarrhea, fever, or malaise) were experienced by 10.8% of patients within 10 days after vaccination. The rate of AEs associated with off-label vaccination for HA and YF is low, suggesting that the vaccines could be considered safe.