Deborah A. Cohen

Dr. Deborah A. Cohen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2007 in American Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
TMThomas L. McKenzie
Thomas L. McKenzie
ASAmber Sehgal
Amber Sehgal
SWStephanie Williamson
Stephanie Williamson
DGDaniela Golinelli
Daniela Golinelli
NLNicole Lurie
Nicole Lurie
Objectives. Parks provide places for people to experience nature, engage in physical activity, and relax. We studied how residents in low-income, minority communities use public, urban neighborhood parks and how parks contribute to physical activity. Methods. In 8 public parks, we used direct observation to document the number, gender, race/ethnicity, age group, and activity level of park users 4 times per day, 7 days per week. We also interviewed 713 park users and 605 area residents living within 2 miles of each park. Results. On average, over 2000 individuals were counted in each park, and about two thirds were sedentary when observed. More males than females used the parks, and males were twice as likely to be vigorously active. Interviewees identified the park as the most common place they exercised. Both park use and exercise levels of individuals were predicted by proximity of their residence to the park. Conclusions. Public parks are critical resources for physical activity in minority communities. Because residential proximity is strongly associated with physical activity and park use, the number and location of parks are currently insufficient to serve local populations well.

1 November 2006 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
JAJ. Scott Ashwood
J. Scott Ashwood
MSMolly M. Scott
Molly M. Scott
AOAdrian Overton
Adrian Overton
KEKelly R. Evenson
Kelly R. Evenson
DCDiane Catellier
Diane Catellier
OBJECTIVES. Physical activity may be constrained or facilitated by local environments. The availability of neighborhood facilities for physical activity may be particularly relevant for youth, who are unable to drive and whose activity is often limited to the immediate distance they are able to walk or bicycle. Several studies have shown that proximity to recreational facilities and parks is one of the most important predictors of physical activity. Because the United States already has an extensive infrastructure of parks, with 70% of adults indicating that they live within walking distance of a park or playground, parks may be a potential venue for increasing physical activity. This might be particularly important for adolescent girls, whose physical activity levels decline substantially as they go through puberty. The goal of this study was to examine the association between park proximity, park type, and park features and physical activity in adolescent girls. PATIENTS AND METHODS. This was a cross-sectional study using baseline data from the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls. It included 1556 grade 6 girls who were randomly selected from 6 middle schools in each of the following 6 field site areas: Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland; Columbia, South Carolina; Minneapolis, Minnesota; New Orleans, Louisiana; Tucson, Arizona; and San Diego, California. Girls wore accelerometers for 6 days to measure metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, a measure accounting for the volume and intensity of activity. Metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was calculated for the hours outside of school time using 2 different cutpoints, activity levels ≥3.0 metabolic equivalents and ≥4.6 metabolic equivalents, the latter indicating activity at the intensity of a brisk walk or higher. We mapped all of the parks within 1 mile of each girl's home. Trained staff used a checklist to document the presence of facilities and amenities at each park, including passive amenities, such as drinking fountains, restrooms, and areas with shade, as well as active amenities like basketball courts, multipurpose fields, playgrounds, and tennis courts. RESULTS. Mean nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, using the 4.6 metabolic equivalent cutoff, was 611.1 minutes (range: 49.7–4718.6 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days) and 1704.8 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days (range: 276.2–5792.6 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days) when using the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutpoint. Many girls had multiple parks within a 1-mile radius of their homes: 57% had ≥1 type of park, the majority being neighborhood or community parks; 42% had between 1 and 3 parks, 37% had ≥4 parks, and 14% had ≥8 parks. The type, number, and specific parks features were associated with girls' nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity. At the 4.6 metabolic equivalent cutpoint, higher levels of nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity were associated with both neighborhood and community parks (22 metabolic equivalent minutes) and miniparks (40 metabolic equivalent minutes). Each park, regardless of type, in the half-mile around each girl's home was associated with an increase in nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity by 2.8% or 17.2 nonschool minutes of metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity per 6 days. Beyond a half-mile, each park increased nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity by 1.1% or 6.7 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days. For the average girl with 3.5 parks within a 1-mile radius of home, the presence of parks accounted for 36.5 extra nonschool metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days, ∼6% of total nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity. Using the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutpoint, this sums to an additional 68 metabolic equivalent minutes of nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity over 6 days, or 4% of the total. The most common amenities in the parks were playgrounds, multipurpose fields, and picnic areas. Slightly more than one third of girls lived within a half-mile of a park with a basketball court, and >20% had access to walking paths and tennis courts in their local park. Higher levels of nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity per 6 days were associated with walking paths (13 metabolic equivalent minutes), running tracks (82 metabolic equivalent minutes), playgrounds (28 metabolic equivalent minutes), and basketball courts (30 metabolic equivalent minutes). Parks with streetlights and floodlights were also associated with an increase of 18 and 22 minutes of nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, respectively. With the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutoff for metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, additional nonschool metabolic equivalent minutes more than doubled when girls had miniparks (92 metabolic equivalent minutes), natural resource areas (36 metabolic equivalent minutes), walking paths (59 metabolic equivalent minutes), and running tracks (208 metabolic equivalent minutes) within a half-mile of their homes. Skateboard areas and special-use parks were negatively associated with nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity in adolescent girls. CONCLUSIONS. Adolescent girls who live near more parks, particularly near those with amenities that are conducive to walking and with active features, engage in more nonschool metabolic equivalent–weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity than those with fewer parks....

1 June 2008 in Health & Place
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
SISanae Inagami
Sanae Inagami
BFBrian Finch
Brian Finch

1 February 2006 in Social Science & Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
BFBrian K. Finch
Brian K. Finch
ABAimee Bower
Aimee Bower
NSNarayan Sastry
Narayan Sastry

3 May 2012 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
SBS. H. Babey
S. H. Babey

1 January 2010 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDeborah A. Cohen
Deborah A. Cohen
TMTerry Marsh
Terry Marsh
SWStephanie Williamson
Stephanie Williamson
KDKathryn Pitkin Derose
Kathryn Pitkin Derose
HMHomero Martinez
Homero Martinez
TMThomas L. McKenzie
Thomas L. McKenzie