Among the 5 health conditions that contribute most to health care costs in the United States, per-person direct medical expenditures on cancer are the highest.¹ Moreover, annual direct medical expenditures on cancer are projected to increase by nearly 40% from 2010 to 2020, largely owing to a combination of changing demographics, increased use of services, and expensive new treatments.² As most new cancers and cancer-associated deaths occur in adults older than 65 years, much of this cost burden will be borne by Medicare, the federal health insurance program for the elderly and disabled.³

In response to concerns about the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care provided to patients with chronic illnesses approaching death, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently released a report entitled Dying in America.¹ The IOM report describes EOL care in the United States as intensive and frequently inconsistent with patients’ preferences. The report advocates a broader definition of advance care planning (ACP), characterized by ongoing clinician-patient discussions of EOL care preferences over time, to help ensure goal-concordant care at EOL.

The resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is attributed to the immune-quiescent and -suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). We recently found that CCR2 and CCR5 were induced in PDAC following treatment with anti–PD-1 antibody (αPD-1); thus, we examined PDAC vaccine or radiation therapy (RT) as T cell priming mechanisms together with BMS-687681, a dual antagonist of CCR2 and CCR5 (CCR2/5i), in combination with αPD-1 as new treatment strategies. Using PDAC mouse models, we demonstrated that RT followed by αPD-1 and prolonged treatment with CCR2/5i conferred better antitumor efficacy than other combination treatments tested. The combination of RT + αPD-1 + CCR2/5i enhanced intratumoral effector and memory T cell infiltration but suppressed regulatory T cell, M2-like tumor–associated macrophage, and myeloid-derived suppressive cell infiltration. RNA sequencing showed that CCR2/5i partially inhibited RT-induced TLR2/4 and RAGE signaling, leading to decreased expression of immunosuppressive cytokines including CCL2/CCL5, but increased expression of effector T cell chemokines such as CCL17/CCL22. This study thus supports the clinical development of CCR2/5i in combination with RT and ICIs for PDAC treatment.

As our understanding of the molecular pathways driving tumorigenesis improves and more druggable targets are identified, we have witnessed a concomitant increase in the development and production of novel molecularly targeted agents. Radiotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of various malignancies with a prominent role in the care of prostate cancer patients, and efforts to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiation by technologic and pharmacologic means have led to important advances in cancer care. One promising approach is to combine molecularly targeted systemic agents with radiotherapy to improve tumor response rates and likelihood of durable control. This review first explores the limitations of preclinical studies as well as barriers to successful implementation of clinical trials with radiosensitizers. Special considerations related to and recommendations for the design of preclinical studies and clinical trials involving molecularly targeted agents combined with radiotherapy are provided. We then apply these concepts by reviewing a representative set of targeted therapies that show promise as radiosensitizers in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Background: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are at high risk of margin-positive resection. Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may help sterilize margins, but its additive benefit beyond neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) is unclear. The authors report long-term outcomes for BRPC/LAPC patients explored after treatment with either nCT alone or nCT followed by five-fraction SBRT (nCT-SBRT). Methods: Patients with BRPC or LAPC from 2011 to 2016 who underwent resection after nCT alone or nCT-SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics were compared, and the propensity score with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to compare pathologic/survival outcomes. Results: Of 198 patients, 76 received nCT, and 122 received nCT-SBRT. The nCT-SBRT cohort had a higher proportion of LAPC (53% vs 22%; p < 0.001). The duration of nCT was longer for nCT-SBRT (4.6 vs 2.9 months; p = 0.03), but adjuvant chemotherapy was less frequently administered (53% vs 67.1%; p < 0.001). Adjuvant radiation was administered to 30% of the nCT patients. The nCT-SBRT regimen more frequently achieved negative margins (92% vs 70%; p < 0.001), negative nodes (59% vs 42%; p < 0.001), and pathologic complete response (7% vs 0%; p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, nCT-SBRT remained associated with R0 resection (p < 0.001). The nCT-SBRT cohort experienced no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) (22.1 vs 24.5 months), local progression-free survival (LPFS) (13.5 vs. 15.4 months), or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (11.7 vs 16.3 months) after surgery. After SBRT, 1-year OS was 77.0% and 2-year OS was 50.4%. Perioperative Claven-Dindo grade 3 or greater morbidity did not differ significantly between the nCT and nCT-SBRT cohorts (p = 0.81). Conclusions: Despite having more advanced disease, the nCT-SBRT cohort was still more likely to undergo an R0 resection and experienced similar survival outcomes compared with the nCT alone cohort.

The most appropriate treatment for men with prostate cancer and positive pelvic nodes, N+, is an area of active controversy. We report our 5-years outcomes in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (T1-T4N0-N1M0) treated with definitive radiotherapy encompassing the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Of the 138 consecutive eligible men all living patients have been followed up to almost 5 years. Survival endpoints for 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazards models were constructed for all survival endpoints. The RTOG morbidity grading system for physician rated toxicity was applied. Patients with locally advanced T3-T4 tumors (35 %) and N1 (51 %) have favorable outcome when long-term ADT is combined with definitive radiotherapy encompassing pelvic lymph nodes. The 5-year BFFS, RFS, PCSS and OS were 71.4, 76.2, 94.5 and 89.0 %, respectively. High Gleason sum (9–10) had a strong independent prognostic impact on BFFS, RFS and OS (p = 0.001, 28 months) showed a significant independent association with improved PCSS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.001). Lymph node involvement was not associated with survival endpoints in the multivariate analysis. The radiotherapy induced toxicity seen in our study population was moderate with rare Grade 3 GI side effects and up to 11 % for Grade 3 GU consisting mainly of urgency and frequency. Pelvic IMRT in combination with long-term ADT can achieve long-lasting disease control in men with N+ disease and unfavorable prognostic factors.