Objective. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) practice sessions are logistically challenging and resource demanding. Our objective was to examine pharmacy students’ OSCE performance and perceptions about an interactive online learning module (Monash OSCE Virtual Experience (MOVE)). Methods. MOVE online module consists of twenty pharmacy case scenarios with virtual patients. It was piloted with our final year pharmacy students at Monash University campuses in Australia (Parkville) and Malaysia (Sunway). A mixed methods approach consisting of: (1) reviewing user attempts and grade comparison, (2) self-administered questionnaires, and (3) focus groups was used to examine students’ perception and performance. Results. More than 99% of all students attempted at least one online case scenario in preparation for their final OSCE. 81% attempted all twenty scenarios two or more times. 90% of Sunway students and 70% of Parkville students reported MOVE to be a helpful study tool for their OSCE preparation. However, raw comparison of user attempts and OSCE marks showed no direct correlation between online module attempts and assessment grades. Self-administered questionnaire and focus group results indicated that MOVE prepared students for targeted and time-bound history taking and problem-solving skills. Overall, students perceived MOVE to be a useful learning tool and less overwhelming learning experience than face to face sessions. Nevertheless, students still preferred face-to-face OSCE practice with simulated patients than online practice with virtual patients. Conclusion. MOVE was perceived by our students as a flexible and useful online learning aid for their final year OSCE preparation.
Objectives: To explore pharmacy colleges’ experiences and challenges worldwide with the transition to online teaching during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: From the six World Health Organization regions, 28 countries with the highest number of COVID-19 cases were identified, and 111 pharmacy colleges were randomly selected from these countries. Two online surveys were sent to faculty members and senior administrators. They assessed changes in teaching and learning, experiential training, assessment, readiness for and challenges with distance e-learning and work-related stress. Key findings: Data were collected from 46 colleges. The majority (80.4%) of colleges transitioned to distance e-learning. On-site experiential training was discontinued in 55.5% of colleges and 25.0% redesigned on-site training into remote learning experiences. Assessments were modified in 75.9% of colleges. Assuring the integrity of assessments and delivering practical classes were the most prominent faculty challenges. The majority of faculty (75.0%) and administrators (61.9%) reported moderate work-related stress. Nevertheless, most academics felt that they received adequate support from their institutions and had positive perceptions of the transition to distance e-learning during the pandemic. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic required drastic changes for most programs’ teaching methods. Our results showed that educational institutions were somewhat able to support faculty and the needs of educational programs were largely met. However, academic rigour and provision of experiential training can be improved. Faculty emotional support and training needs were not fully addressed in these difficult times. These results shed light on how the global pharmacy academy has addressed the COVID-19 pandemic and help rethink crisis response models.