The global energy landscape faces significant challenges, necessitating a transition toward alternative energy sources to mitigate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen emerged as a versatile energy carrier with immense potential, particularly in the realm of transportation. However, the lack of a comprehensive hydrogen infrastructure poses a critical barrier to its widespread adoption. By examining various important factors including the pressure level, transported capacity, trailer capacity, pipeline diameter, pressure drop, and transport distance, this study aims to optimize the hydrogen supply chain and improve the cost‐effectiveness of compressed hydrogen gas transportation. Five major delivery modes, encompassing compressed gas trucks and pipelines of varying diameters, are evaluated. This research offers valuable insights into the costs associated with hydrogen delivery within the European context. It reveals that the total levelized cost of hydrogen transportation (LCOHT) ranges from 0.3 to 3.44 € kg⁻¹. These cost fluctuations are observed over transport distances that extend from 25 to 500 km and are dependent upon varying hydrogen demand levels, encompassing quantities of up to 100 000 kg per day. Based on the results, optimal choices for transport infrastructure are identified considering factors such as distance and hydrogen demand.

Meeting Germany’s climate targets urgently demands substantial investment in renewable energies such as hydrogen, as well as tackling industrial CO₂ emissions with a strong CO₂ transport infrastructure. This is particularly crucial for CO₂-heavy industries such as steel, cement, lime production, power plants, and chemical plants, given Germany’s ban on onshore storage. The CO₂ transport network is essential for maintaining a circular economy by capturing, transporting, and either storing or utilizing CO₂. This study fills gaps in CO₂ pipeline transport research, examining pipeline diameters, costs, and pressure drop, and providing sensitivity analysis. Key findings show that the levelized cost of CO₂ transport (LCO2T) ranges from 0.25 €/t to 55.82 €/t based on varying transport masses (1000 t/day to 25,000 t/day) and distances (25 km to 500 km), with compression costs pushing LCO2T to 33.21 €/t to 92.82 €/t. Analyzing eight pipeline diameters (150 mm to 500 mm) and the impact of CO₂ flow temperature on pressure loss highlights the importance of selecting optimal pipeline sizes. Precise booster station placement is also crucial, as it significantly affects the total LCO2T. Exploring these areas can offer a more thorough understanding of the best strategies for developing cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable transport infrastructure.

Hydrogen storage plays a crucial role in enabling its large‐scale adoption as an energy carrier. This study examines the technical and economic aspects of storing hydrogen in 200‐bar pressure vessels. It focuses on the impact of different transportation methods, including 350‐bar trailers, 540‐bar trailers, and pipelines, on storage performance and costs. Key factors analyzed include pressure and temperature variations during the filling process, the levelized cost of hydrogen storage, and the combined levelized cost of hydrogen transportation and storage. The results indicate that higher mass flow rates lead to increased temperature fluctuations, requiring careful control to maintain safe operating conditions. Additionally, while the levelized storage costs decrease with increasing hydrogen demand, the choice of transportation method significantly influences the total cost. The analysis shows that 350‐bar trailers offer the most cost‐effective transport and storage solution for short to medium distances, whereas, 540‐bar trailers become more viable at longer distances. These insights provide a foundation for optimizing hydrogen infrastructure, balancing cost and efficiency in storage and distribution.

Renewable energy technologies can help us combat climate change and hydrokinetic energy conversion systems could play a major role. The simplicity of hydrokinetic devices helps us to exploit renewable sources, especially in remote locations, which is not possible with conventional methods. A new type of hydrokinetic device called the Energy Conveyor Belt was designed, which works on the concept of conveyor belt technology. Numerical simulations are performed on the design of the Energy Conveyor Belt with Ansys FLUENT to optimize its performance. Some of the optimized models produced a maximum power slightly above 1 kW. The numerical results are then compared to the experimental results of other hydrokinetic turbines. The compactness and flexibility of the design give the Energy Conveyor Belt an advantage over other hydrokinetic devices in regions with fluctuating water levels. Further research has to be undertaken into cascading systems to increase the overall power generated by the system.