Problems such as population growth and climate change have led to a reduction in the use of water for irrigated agriculture, constraining the growth of crops. Subsurface irrigation, as a widely used and efficient water-saving irrigation technology, varies in its effect on increasing yields and saving water under different environmental, management, and other conditions. To investigate the effects of subsurface irrigation on yield, water productivity (WP), and irrigation water productivity (IWP) of three typical crops (wheat, maize, and cotton), this paper conducted a meta-analysis of 528 pairs of studies from 64 papers worldwide to quantify the response of crop yield, WP, and IWP to subsurface irrigation. Overall, the yield, WP and IWP increased by 5.96%, 21.62%, and 27.72%, respectively, with subsurface irrigation compared with surface irrigation. Compared with other conditions, the greatest rate of change was observed at around 200–500 m above sea level, 10–15 °C average annual temperature, 1.45–1.55 g/cm³ soil bulk density, alkaline soil, and when the crops were planted with equal row spacing. Meanwhile, the amount of irrigation water, as well as the subsurface pipeline arrangement and burial depth, had significant effects on crop yield, WP, and IWP. The maximum increase in crop yield, WP, and IWP was favored when the irrigation volume of the subsurface irrigation was reduced by 50–100% compared with surface irrigation or when both had the same volume of irrigation but a mild water deficit. In addition, the yield, WP, and IWP were also affected by fertilization factors. The recommended fertilizer application rates were ≤90 kg P ha^–1 (phosphorus) and <150 kg N ha^–1 (nitrogen). Compared with surface irrigation, subsurface irrigation showed the greatest yield increase when fertilizer was applied in a one-time application, and the WP and IWP increased significantly when the number of fertilizer applications was <3.

Salinity is one of the main abiotic stresses, and the stomatal conductance (gs) is an important physiological index in plants that is used to measure their responses to salt stress, as stomatal closure leads to lower yields. However, the factors that affect the gs after biochar application in saline soil remain unclear. To explore the stomatal adaptation mechanisms of facility vegetables under salt stress after the addition of biochar, Chinese cabbage was selected for the pot experiment in this study. The soil and plant Na⁺ and K⁺ concentrations, water status, and plant stomatal parameters were measured following treatments with different salt concentrations (25, 50, and 100 mM) and biochar application rates (0, 2, and 4%). The results showed that salt stress induced the physiological closure of the stomata in Chinese cabbage. Compared with the salt-stress treatment without biochar, the biochar application significantly increased the plant gs (20.29–128.79%). Moreover, in the biochar treatment, the open state of the stomata was maintained by sustaining the plant osmotic adjustment, reducing the abscisic acid (ABA) content, and improving the water status. The Na⁺/K⁺ ratio had the most pronounced effect on the stomata (0.702). The actual photochemical efficiency of the photosystem II (ΦPSII) and electron transport rate (ETR) of the Chinese cabbage increased by 0.75–3.41% and 0.65–2.88%, respectively, after the biochar application, which supported the photosynthetic capacity and yield formation. According to the current findings, biochar application can mitigate salt stress and regulate stomatal opening, thereby improving the photosynthesis and the overall yield of Chinese cabbage. Therefore, the application of biochar is a promising method to maintain the productivity of Chinese cabbage under salt stress.