We have previously reported that silencing of galectin‐4 expression in polarized HT‐29 cells perturbed apical biosynthetic trafficking and resulted in a phenotype similar to the inhibitor of glycosylation, 1‐benzyl‐2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐galactopyranoside (GalNAcα‐O‐bn). We now present evidence of a lipid raft‐based galectin‐4‐dependent mechanism of apical delivery of glycoproteins in these cells. First, galectin‐4 recruits the apical glycoproteins in detergent‐resistant membranes (DRMs) because these glycoproteins were depleted in DRMs isolated from galectin‐4‐knockdown (KD) HT‐29 5M12 cells. DRM‐associated glycoproteins were identified as ligands for galectin‐4. Structural analysis showed that DRMs were markedly enriched in a series of complex N‐glycans in comparison to detergent‐soluble membranes. Second, in galectin‐4‐KD cells, the apical glycoproteins still exit the Golgi but accumulated inside the cells, showing that their recruitment within lipid rafts and their apical trafficking required the delivery of galectin‐4 at a post‐Golgi level. This lectin that is synthesized on free cytoplasmic ribosomes is externalized from HT‐29 cells mostly in the apical medium and follows an apical endocytic–recycling pathway that is required for the apical biosynthetic pathway. Together, our data show that the pattern of N‐glycosylation of glycoproteins serves as a recognition signal for endocytosed galectin‐4, which drives the raft‐dependent apical pathway of glycoproteins in enterocyte‐like HT‐29 cells.
1 June 2009 in Seizure: European Journal of Epilepsy
This review is aimed at illustrating that mitochondrial dysfunction and altered lipid homeostasis may concur in a variety of pathogenesis states, being either contributive or consecutive to primary disease events. Underlying mechanisms for this concurrence are far from being the exhaustive elements taking place in disease development. They may however complicate, contribute or cause the disease. In the first part of the review, physiological roles of mitochondria in coordinating lipid metabolism and in controlling reactive oxygen species (ROS), ATP and calcium levels are briefly presented. In a second part, clues for how mitochondria-driven alterations in lipid metabolism may induce toxicity are discussed. In the third part, it is illustrated how mitochondrial dysfunction and lipid homeostasis disruption may be associated (i) to complicate type 1 diabetes (pancreatic β-cell mitochondrial dysfunction in ATP yield induces reduced insulin secretion and hence disruption of glucose and lipid metabolism), (ii) to contribute to type 2 diabetes and other insulin resistant states (mitochondrial impairment may induce adipocyte dysfunction with subsequent increase in circulating free fatty acids and their abnormal deposit in non adipose tissues (pancreatic β-cells, skeletal muscle and liver) which results in lipotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction), (iii) to offer new clues in our understanding of how the brain controls feeding supply and energy expenditure, (iv) to promote cancer development notably via fatty acid oxidation/synthesis imbalance (in favor of synthesis) further strengthened in some cancers by a lipogenetic benefit induced by a HER2/fatty acid synthase cross-talk, and (v) to favor cardiovascular disorders by impacting heart function and arterial wall integrity.