Rosaria Orlandi

Dr. Rosaria Orlandi

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 1989 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RORosaria Orlandi
Rosaria Orlandi
DGD H Güssow
D H Güssow
PJP T Jones
P T Jones
GWG Winter
G Winter
We have designed a set of oligonucleotide primers to amplify the cDNA of mouse immunoglobulin heavy and light chain variable domains by the polymerase chain reaction. The primers incorporate restriction sites that allow the cDNA of the variable domains to be force-cloned for sequencing and expression. Here we have applied the technique to clone and sequence the variable domains of five hybridoma antibodies and to express a mouse-human chimeric antibody that binds to the human mammary carcinoma line MCF-7. The technique should also lead to the cloning of antigen-binding specificities directly from immunoglobulin genes.

10 January 2008 in The Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABA Bergamaschi
A Bergamaschi
Elda TagliabueElda Tagliabue
Elda Tagliabue
TST Sørlie
T Sørlie
BNB Naume
B Naume
Tiziana TriulziTiziana Triulzi
Tiziana Triulzi
ABA‐L Børresen‐Dale
A‐L Børresen‐Dale

18 October 2004 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPaolo G. Casali
Paolo G. Casali
AMAntonella Messina
Antonella Messina
Silvia StacchiottiSilvia Stacchiotti
Silvia Stacchiotti
ETElena Tamborini
Elena Tamborini
FCFlavio Crippa
Flavio Crippa
SPSilvana Pilotti
Silvana Pilotti
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, no effective medical therapy currently is available for advanced chordoma. Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting platelet‐derived growth factor receptor‐β (PDGFRB), BCR‐ABL, and KIT.METHODS: Six patients with advanced chordoma were treated with imatinib mesylate at a dose of 800 mg daily. In all patients, the tumor was found to be positive for PDGFRB, and in four patients PDGFRB was shown to be phosphorylated/expressed.RESULTS: After a treatment period of ≥ 1 year, overt tumor liquefaction was evident on computed tomography (CT) scan in the first patient. In previous months, a decrease in contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a decrease in glucose uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) were detected. Similar signs on MRI and PET were observed in subsequent patients, who had a shorter treatment period. One of these patients initially was removed from therapy and then was readmitted to therapy because of difficulties with regard to tumor response assessment; 1 month after the reinitiation of therapy, an overt decrease in tumor density was visible on CT scan in this patient. In four of five symptomatic patients, a subjective improvement was observed early in the course of treatment. The first patient died after 17 months, with a sizeable, mostly liquefied mass. Another patient died early, apparently of unrelated causes. The remaining patients were on therapy at the time of last follow‐up.CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib mesylate has been found to have antitumor activity in patients with chordoma. This activity might be mediated by inactivation of PDGFRB. Tumor response manifests through patterns that are similar to those observed in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors who respond to molecular‐targeted therapy, but evolves more slowly. The benefit to the patient entailed by this pattern of tumor response in chordoma needs to be elucidated, but may be limited in the presence of significant local disease. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

16 March 2000 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Silvia SirchiaSilvia Sirchia
Silvia Sirchia
AFAnne T Ferguson
Anne T Ferguson
ESElena Sironi
Elena Sironi
SSSmitha Subramanyan
Smitha Subramanyan
RORosaria Orlandi
Rosaria Orlandi
NSNicoletta Sacchi
Nicoletta Sacchi

1 December 2005 in Clinical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJinong Li
Jinong Li
RORosaria Orlandi
Rosaria Orlandi
CWC Nicole White
C Nicole White
JRJason Rosenzweig
Jason Rosenzweig
JZJing Zhao
Jing Zhao
DCDaniel W Chan
Daniel W Chan
Background: We previously selected a panel of 3 breast cancer biomarkers (BC1, BC2, and BC3) from serum samples collected at a single hospital based on their collective contribution to the optimal separation of breast cancer patients and noncancer controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). The identities and general applicability of these markers, however, were unknown. In this study, we performed protein expression profiling on samples obtained from a second hospital, included a greater number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases, and performed purification and identification of the 2 confirmed markers.Methods: Using a case–control study design, we performed protein expression profiling on serum samples from the National Cancer Institute (Milan, Italy). The validation sample cohort consisted of 61 women with locally invasive breast cancer, 32 with DCIS, 37 with various benign breast diseases (including 13 atypical), and 46 age-matched apparently healthy women (age range, 44–68 years). Validated biomarkers were purified and identified with serial chromatography, 1-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in-gel ASP-N digestion, peptide mass fingerprinting, and tandem mass peptide sequencing.Results: The BC3 and BC2 expression patterns in this sample set were consistent with the first study sample set. BC3 and BC2 were identified to be complement component C3adesArg and a C-terminal–truncated form of C3adesArg, respectively.Conclusions: Evaluation of biomarkers in independent sample sets can help determine the broader utility of candidate markers, and protein identification permits understanding of their molecular basis. C3adesArg appears to lack specificity among patients with benign diseases, limiting its utility as a stand-alone tumor marker, but it may still be useful in a multimarker panel for early detection of breast cancer.

1 September 2016 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSabina Sangaletti
Sabina Sangaletti
CTClaudio Tripodo
Claudio Tripodo
ASAlessandra Santangelo
Alessandra Santangelo
NCNadia Castioni
Nadia Castioni
PPPaola Portararo
Paola Portararo
MCMario P. Colombo
Mario P. Colombo
The extracellular matrix (ECM) contributes to the biological and clinical heterogeneity of breast cancer, and different prognostic groups can be identified according to specific ECM signatures. In high-grade, but not low-grade, tumors, an ECM signature characterized by high SPARC expression (ECM3) identifies tumors with increased epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), reduced treatment response, and poor prognosis. To better understand how this ECM3 signature is contributing to tumorigenesis, we expressed SPARC in isogenic cell lines and found that SPARC overexpression in tumor cells reduces their growth rate and induces EMT. SPARC expression also results in the formation of a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment, composed by infiltrating T regulatory cells, mast cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). The ability of SPARC to induce EMT depended on the localization and suppressive function of myeloid cells, and inhibition of the suppressive function MDSCs by administration of aminobisphosphonates could revert EMT, rendering SPARC-overexpressing tumor cells sensitive to Doxil. We conclude that that SPARC is regulating the interplay between MDSCs and the ECM to drive the induction of EMT in tumor cells.