BACKGROUND: Cancer biomarkers are the backbone for the implementation of individualized approaches to bladder cancer (BCa). Hyaluronic acid (HA) and all 7 members of the HA family, that is, HA synthases (HA1, HA2, HA3), HYAL‐1 hyaluronidase, and HA receptors (CD44s, CD44v, and RHAMM), function in tumor growth and progression. However, the diagnostic and prognostic potential of these 7 HA family members has not been compared simultaneously in any cancer. We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic potential of HA family members in BCa.METHODS: Using quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry, expression of HA family members was evaluated in prospectively collected bladder tissues (n = 72); mean and median follow‐up were 29.6 ± 5.3 and 24 months, respectively. Transcript levels were also measured in exfoliated urothelial cells from urine specimens (n = 148).RESULTS: Among the HA family members, transcript levels of the HA synthases, HYAL‐1, CD44v, and RHAMM were 4‐ to 16‐fold higher in BCa tissues than in normal tissues (P < .0001); however, CD44s levels were lower. In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor stage (P = .003), lymph node invasion (P = .033), HYAL‐1 (P = .019), and HAS1 (P = .027) transcript levels, and HYAL‐1 staining (P = .021) were independently associated with metastasis. Tumor stage (P = .019) and HYAL‐1 (P = .046) transcript levels were also associated with disease‐specific mortality. Although HA synthase and HYAL‐1 transcript levels were elevated in exfoliated urothelial cells from BCa patients, the combined HAS2–HYAL‐1 expression detected BCa with an overall sensitivity of 85.4% and a specificity of 79.5% and predicted BCa recurrence within 6 months (P = .004; RR = 6.7).CONCLUSIONS: HYAL‐1 and HAS1 expression predicted BCa metastasis, and HYAL‐1 expression also predicted disease‐specific survival. Furthermore, the combined HAS2–HYAL‐1 biomarker detected BCa and significantly predicted its recurrence. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Background: Fibronectin 1 (FN1) is a glycoprotein involved in cellular adhesion and migration processes. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of FN1 in development of renal cell cancer (RCC) and to determine a prognostic relevance for optimal clinical management. Methods: 212 renal tissue samples (109 RCC, 86 corresponding tissues from adjacent normal renal tissue and 17 oncocytomas) were collected from patients undergoing surgery for renal tumors and subjected to total RNA extraction. Detection of FN1 mRNA expression was performed using quantitative real time PCR, three endogenous controls, renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (RPTEC) as biological control and the ΔΔCt method for calculation of relative quantities. Results: Mean tissue specific FN1 mRNA expression was found to be increased approximately seven fold comparing RCC and corresponding kidney control tissues (p < 0.001; ANOVA). Furthermore, tissue specific mean FN1 expression was increased approx. 11 fold in clear cell compared to papillary RCC (p = 9×10^-5; Wilcoxon rank sum test). Patients with advanced disease had higher FN1 expression when compared to organ-confined disease (p < 0.001; Wilcoxon rank sum test). Applying subgroup analysis we found a significantly higher FN1 mRNA expression between organ-confined and advanced disease in the papillary and not in the clear cell RCC group (p = 0.02 vs. p = 0.2; Wilcoxon rank sum test). There was an increased expression in RCC compared to oncocytoma (p = 0.016; ANOVA). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that FN1 mRNA expression is higher in RCC compared to normal renal tissue. FN1 mRNA expression might serve as a marker for RCC aggressiveness, indicating early systemic progression particularly for patients with papillary RCC.

Enzalutamide is an oral androgen receptor inhibitor that targets multiple steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway. In the randomized phase III AFFIRM study, significant improvements in survival versus placebo were observed when enzalutamide was used as a treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following prior treatment with docetaxel. Additional benefits included significant delay in time to first skeletal-related event, and improvement in several measures of pain and health-related quality of life. Treatment effects were consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The phase III PREVAIL study evaluated enzalutamide versus placebo in patients with mCRPC who had not received chemotherapy. Enzalutamide significantly decreased the risk of radiographic progression and death. There were also significant improvements in all secondary and prespecified exploratory endpoints, including delayed initiation of chemotherapy, reduction in risk of first skeletal-related event and a high percentage of patients with objective response compared with placebo. Enzalutamide was also studied in hormone naïve patients (as monotherapy) in a small, open-label phase II study in patients with prostate cancer who were eligible for androgen-deprivation therapy. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as ⩾80% decline in PSA level from baseline at week 25, was achieved in 92.5% of patients. Long-term follow up is ongoing. Despite differences between these three trials, enzalutamide displayed a favorable safety profile in all three patient populations. Similar rates of adverse events between the enzalutamide and placebo groups were observed in AFFIRM and PREVAIL, with fatigue, diarrhea, back pain and hot flashes being more common with enzalutamide than with placebo. Hypertension was reported at a higher rate in the enzalutamide group than in the placebo group in PREVAIL. Breast-related disorders associated with enzalutamide treatment were also reported in the Monotherapy trial. Few seizures were reported in any trial. Enzalutamide is being studied in several early disease state populations.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay palliative treatment for men with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer, and aims to reduce testosterone to levels obtained by surgical castration. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists predominates among the ADT options. The GnRH agonist, triptorelin is a first-line hormonal therapy that has demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials of patients with locally advanced non-metastatic or metastatic disease. Sustained-release 1-, 3- and 6-month formulations of triptorelin, administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously, have been developed to provide improved flexibility and convenience for the patient. Head-to-head studies of GnRH agonists are lacking in the field of prostate cancer. Despite the inevitable progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in most patients receiving ADT, monitoring of testosterone levels needs to improve in routine practice and physicians should not overlook the benefits of continued ADT in their patients when introducing one of the various new treatment options for CRPC. For improved survival outcomes, there remains a need to tailor ADT treatment regimens, novel hormonal agents and chemotherapy according to the individual patient with advanced prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is well established as a backbone therapy for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), and both European and American guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining ADT after progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the use of ADT varies widely in clinical practice despite these recommendations. Both research and development of increasingly precise assay technologies have improved our understanding of androgen production and signaling, and the recent data have suggested that a new serum testosterone cutoff value of <0.7 nmol/L should be employed. Most clinical trials to date have used the historical 1.7 nmol/L cutoff, but the <0.7 nmol/L cutoff has been associated with improved patient outcomes. Combining agents with different mechanisms of action to achieve intense androgen blockade may improve survival both before and after progression to CRPC. Data suggest that this intensive approach to androgen deprivation could delay the transition to CPRC and hence improve survival dramatically. Various combinations of backbone ADT with chemotherapy or radiotherapy are under investigation. Administration of ADT is established in patients with intermediate or high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) receiving radiotherapy with curative intent. This article reviews the current and potential role of ADT as backbone therapy in both hormone-sensitive PCa and CRPC with a focus on mPCa.