The 24-h urine protein (24-hUP) excretion is the gold standard for evaluating proteinuria. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) for estimating 24-hUP at various levels of renal function and proteinuria levels. A cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2021 and December 2023 in Salvador, Bahia-Brazil, as an extension of previously published data from the TUNARI study. The study included 217 samples from 152 patients with various levels of renal function and proteinuria. PCR in isolated samples and 24-hUP were determined conventionally within a 24-h timeframe. Patients were classified into three groups according to the level of renal function (Group 1 = 10 to < 30 mL/min, Group 2 = 30–60 mL/min, and Group 3 = > 60 mL/min) and level of proteinuria (< 0.3 g/day, 0.3–3.5 g/day, and > 3.5 g/day). The data were analyzed using the Spearman correlation (rs), coefficient of determination (r2), Bland–Altman plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Likelihood ratios, positive (LR +), and negative (LR-) were derived from the sensitivity and specificity of PCR. Mean age was 41.5 ± 15.7 years, 61.8% were women, 36.8% Black and 52% Mixed-race. Glomerulopathies constituted 80.3%; 46.1% with lupus nephritis. Of the total urine samples, we observed a high correlation between PCR in the total sample of 24-hUP sample (rs = 0.86, p < 0.001) across different levels of renal function. However, agreement between PCR and 24-hUP was reduced at higher levels of proteinuria. The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92, 0.98), sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 86.5% (LR + 6.7; LR- 0.1), with an optimal cut-off of 0.77. These results were similar across renal function levels. Proteinuria ≤ 0.3 g/day showed a high sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 90%, with an area under (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI = 0.71; 0.94). In the 24-hUP range > 0.3–3.5 g/day, the sensitivity was 64.1%, the specificity was 84.6%, and the AUC was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.67; 0.84), PCR detected all cases > 3.5 g/day. PCR is a suitable measure to be used as an indicator of 24-hUP at different levels of renal function, but may have limitations at higher levels of proteinuria. Analysis of PCR by proteinuria level found that agreement as well as sensitivity decreases at higher levels, but it maintains good specificity and is able to identify nephrotic range proteinuria.

Frailty is associated with an increased probability of serious adverse health outcomes in the geriatric general population. People living with HIV have a higher prevalence of frailty. However, the magnitude of this problem in younger patients in South America is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with frailty. This is a cross-sectional study from the Brazilian cohort HIV-AIDS (CoBRA) developed between March and November of 2018, on patients ≥18 years of age. Frailty phenotype was assessed by original Fried criteria. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while identification of factors related to frailty was assessed by using multivariate logistic regression. We enrolled 231 patients; all, but 2 were on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Median age was 45.6 interquartile range (36.7–52.1) years, 136 (58.9%) were male, and 86.7% self-identified as non-white. Mean CD4 count was 660 (±345) cells/mm ³ and 83.5% had undetectable HIV plasma viral load (<50 copies/mL). Prevalence of frailty and prefrailty was 10.4% and 52.4%, respectively. A CD4 count <200 cells/mm ³ , depression, low income, and use of third-line ART were variables significantly associated with a greater risk to present frail or prefrail status. Frailty prevalence increases with age and is an important health problem to health care in HIV aging patients. It requires proper strategies to its early detection, prevention, and management.

Brazil is the third country most affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the world. Health care workers (HCWs) are at higher risk of infection. Despite the increasing numbers of studies on the topic, There are gaps in the knowledge of characteristics and risk factors for infection of HCWS. This information is important to design preventive strategies and to mitigate the disease impact. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, to identify factors associated, and to describe symptoms reported by healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital in Salvador, Brazil. All HCWs were evaluated in a cross-sectional study conducted between May and September 2020, using self-administered questionnaires, and screening all participants for SARS-COV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies by rapid tests. Reactive IgG samples were retested by ELISA and IgM-positive test had a saliva sample retest by RT-PCR. Univariate associations were estimated by a non-adjusted incidence proportion ratio. Variables associated with COVID-19 incidence at p < 0.20 were selected for inclusion in a binary logistic regression model. A total of 2083 HCWs were included, mean age 41±10 years, 71.8% women, and 77.8% non-white. Of these, 271 (13.0%) and 25 (1.2%) HCWs tested positive for IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, respectively, and three had a positive RT-PCR. Ancillary work [Odds Ratio (OR): 4.96], elementary education (OR: 2.91), high school education (OR: 2.89), and catholic religion (OR: 2.16) were associated with an increased likelihood of a positive IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Anosmia [Incidence Proportion Ratio (IPR): 7.41] and ageusia (IPR:8.51) were the most frequent associated symptoms. HCWs with low mean family income, lower level of schooling, ancillary workor being black had a significantly higher likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Social vulnerability was an important risk factor for COVID-19 infection.

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) infection affects over ten million people worldwide, but there is no effective treatment so far. This review describes the virological, immunological, and clinical outcomes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people with HTLV infection. This systematic review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022350076. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, adapted for cross-sectional studies, and Rob-2 were used to assess the methodological quality of these studies. Systematic searches were conducted in the Medline (PubMed), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) databases. We retrieved data from eight methodologically diverse articles on treatment of patients infected by HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 alone, or coinfected by HIV-1, who received Raltegravir, Tenofovir, Lamivudine, or Zidovudine. The proviral load decreased in three out of seven studies over 4 to 48 weeks of antiretroviral use. Cellular immune response (CD4, CD8, CD25, CD69, and CD71 cells) was evaluated in six studies. While no significant clinical improvement was observed, all studies reported clinical stability during treatment. Despite the demonstrated antiviral activity of ART, in vitro, clinical improvement was not proven. Most studies showed disease stability during ART use, suggesting potential clinical benefits. There is a need of larger, well-controlled trials to define the role of ART in the treatment of HTLV infection.