Rosario Francesco Grasso

Dr. Rosario Francesco Grasso

Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 March 2012 in BMC Medical Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRiccardo Del Vescovo
Riccardo Del Vescovo
SBSofia Battisti
Sofia Battisti
VPValerio Di Paola
Valerio Di Paola
CPClaudia L Piccolo
Claudia L Piccolo
RCRoberto L Cazzato
Roberto L Cazzato
Bruno Beomonte ZobelBruno Beomonte Zobel
Bruno Beomonte Zobel
Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome is a very rare congenital anomaly of the urogenital tract involving Müllerian ducts and Wolffian structures, and it is characterized by the triad of didelphys uterus, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. It generally occurs at puberty and exhibits non-specific and variable symptoms with acute or pelvic pain shortly following menarche, causing a delay in the diagnosis. Moreover, the diagnosis is complicated by the infrequency of this syndrome, because Müllerian duct anomalies (MDA) are infrequently encountered in a routine clinical setting.

18 July 2007 in Abdominal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RVRiccardo Del Vescovo
Riccardo Del Vescovo
ISIlaria Sansoni
Ilaria Sansoni
RCRenato Caviglia
Renato Caviglia
MRMentore Ribolsi
Mentore Ribolsi
Giuseppe PerroneGiuseppe Perrone
Giuseppe Perrone
Bruno Beomonte ZobelBruno Beomonte Zobel
Bruno Beomonte Zobel

19 November 2009 in Abdominal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rosario Francesco GrassoRosario Francesco Grasso
Rosario Francesco Grasso
VGVincenza Di Giacomo
Vincenza Di Giacomo
PSPietro Sedati
Pietro Sedati
OSOrnella Sizzi
Ornella Sizzi
GFGiuseppe Florio
Giuseppe Florio
Bruno Beomonte ZobelBruno Beomonte Zobel
Bruno Beomonte Zobel

15 February 2008 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rosario Francesco GrassoRosario Francesco Grasso
Rosario Francesco Grasso
DEDoreen Engelberts
Doreen Engelberts
EHEmma Helm
Emma Helm
HFHelena Frndova
Helena Frndova
SJSteven Jarvis
Steven Jarvis
BKBrian P. Kavanagh
Brian P. Kavanagh
Rationale: Conventional positive-pressure ventilation delivers pressure to the airways; in contrast, negative pressure is delivered globally to the chest and abdomen. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that ventilation with negative pressure results in better oxygenation and less injury than with positive pressure. Methods: Anesthetized, surfactant-depleted rabbits were ventilated for 2.5 hours in pairs (positive or negative). Tidal volume was 12 ml · kg−1, normocapnia was maintained by adjusting respiratory rate, and FiO2 was 1.0. Measurements and Main Results: Lung injury was assessed with histologic scoring, perfusion using thermodilution (global perfusion), and injected intravascular microspheres (regional perfusion); and dynamic computed tomography was used to determine inflation patterns. Negative pressure was associated with a higher PaO2, a lower Pa–PetCO2 gradient (despite identical minute ventilation), and less lung injury. Lung perfusion (global and regional) was similar with positive and negative pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the airway was more efficiently transmitted to the pleural space than comparable levels of negative end-expiratory pressure applied to the chest wall; however, the oxygenation associated with any level of end-expiratory lung volume was greater when achieved by negative versus positive pressure. Dynamic computed tomography suggested that lung distension achieved with negative pressure is characterized by greater proportions of normally aerated lung (with less atelectasis) during inspiration and at end-expiration. Conclusions: Negative-pressure ventilation results in superior oxygenation that is unrelated to lung perfusion and may be explained by more effective inflation of lung volume during both inspiration and expiration.

18 April 2017 in Medical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMM. Macchi
M. Macchi
MBMaria Paola Belfiore
Maria Paola Belfiore
CFChiara Floridi
Chiara Floridi
NSNicola Serra
Nicola Serra
GBG. Belfiore
G. Belfiore
GCG. Carrafiello
G. Carrafiello

1 December 2015 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Paola SaccomandiPaola Saccomandi
Paola Saccomandi
Emiliano SchenaEmiliano Schena
Emiliano Schena
Carlo MassaroniCarlo Massaroni
Carlo Massaroni
YFY. Fong
Y. Fong
Rosario Francesco GrassoRosario Francesco Grasso
Rosario Francesco Grasso
RCR.L. Cazzato
R.L. Cazzato