Events of the recent past have focused attention on the possibility of radiological (nuclear) terrorism and on the implications of such terrorist threats for radiation accident preparedness. This review discusses recent advances in the knowledge about how radiation injuries from such events might be treated pharmacologically, and the practical barriers to clinical utilization of these approaches. A wide range of pharmacological approaches are being developed in the laboratory that could greatly expand the ability to treat acute and chronic radiation injuries. However, there are currently a variety of practical and legal barriers that would prevent the actual clinical use of most of the approaches. There are also the potential weaknesses in most of the current programmes for dealing with the consequences of radiation accidents or nuclear terrorism, including the absence of widespread radiation biodosimetry capabilities and the resulting inability to triage. If a major radiation accident or terrorist event occurs, the lack of biodosimetry and treatment capabilities will be compounded by widespread public fear of 'radiation'.

It is known that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) can be used to mitigate radiation-induced renal injury. However, for a variety of reasons, these previous results are not directly applicable to the development of agents for the mitigation of injuries caused by terrorism-related radiation exposure. As part of an effort to develop an animal model that would fit the requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “Animal Efficacy Rule”, we designed new studies which used an FDA-approved ACEI (captopril) or an FDA-approved ARB (losartan, Cozaar®) started 10 days after a single total-body irradiation (TBI) at drug doses that are equivalent (on a g/m2/day basis) to the doses prescribed to humans. Captopril and losartan were equally effective as mitigators, with DMFs of 1.23 and 1.21, respectively, for delaying renal failure. These studies show that radiation nephropathy in a realistic rodent model can be mitigated with relevant doses of FDA-approved agents. This lays the necessary groundwork for pivotal rodent studies under the FDA Animal Efficacy Rule and provides an outline of how the FDA-required large-animal studies could be designed.

Radiation nephropathy has emerged as a significant complication of bone marrow transplantation and radionuclide radiotherapy, and is a potential sequela of radiological terrorism and radiation accidents. In the early 1990s, it was demonstrated that experimental radiation nephropathy could be treated with a thiol-containing ACE inhibitor, captopril. Further studies have shown that enalapril (a non-thiol ACE inhibitor) is also effective in the treatment of experimental radiation nephropathy, as are both AII type-1 (AT1) and type-2 (AT2) receptor antagonists. ACE inhibitors and AII receptor antagonists are also effective in the mitigation (prevention) of radiation nephropathy. Other types of antihypertensive drugs are ineffective in mitigation, but brief use of a high-salt diet in the immediate post-irradiation period significantly decreases renal injury. There are differences between mitigation and treatment of radiation nephropathy that imply that different mechanisms are operating. First, a high-salt diet is effective in the mitigation of radiation nephropathy, but deleterious on the treatment of established disease. Second, AT1 blockade is more effective than ACE inhibition for mitigation of radiation nephropathy, but equally effective for treatment. Third, the efficacy of AT1 blockade and ACE inhibition is highly dependent on drug dose in mitigation of radiation nephropathy, but not so in treatment. Finally, while AT2 blockade augments the benefit of AT1 blockade in mitigation of radiation nephropathy, it does not do so in treatment. We hypothesize that while mitigation of radiation nephropathy works by suppression of the renin-angiotensin system, treatment of established radiation nephropathy requires blood pressure control in addition to (or possibly instead of) suppression of the renin-angiotensin system.

Lenarczyk, M., Cohen, E. P., Fish, B. L., Irving, A. A., Sharma, M., Driscoll, C. D. and Moulder, J. E. Chronic Oxidative Stress as a Mechanism for Radiation Nephropathy. Radiat. Res. 171, 164–172 (2009).Suppression of the renin-angiotensin system has proven efficacy for mitigation and treatment of radiation nephropathy, and it has been hypothesized that this efficacy is due to suppression of radiation-induced chronic oxidative stress. It is known that radiation exposure leads to acute oxidative stress, but direct evidence for radiation-induced chronic renal oxidative stress is sparse. We looked for evidence of oxidative stress after total-body irradiation in a rat model, focusing on the period before there is physiologically significant renal damage. No statistically significant increase in urinary 8-isoprostane (a marker of lipid peroxidation) or carbonylated proteins (a marker of protein oxidation) was found over the first 42 days after irradiation, while a small but statistically significant increase in urinary 8-hydroxydeoxy-guanosine (a marker of DNA oxidation) was detected at 35–55 days. When we examined renal tissue from these animals, we found no significant increase in either DNA or protein oxidation products over the first 89 days after irradiation. Using five different standard methods for detecting oxidative stress in vivo, we found no definitive evidence for radiation-induced renal chronic oxidative stress. If chronic oxidative stress is part of the pathogenesis of radiation nephropathy, it does not leave widespread or easily detectable evidence behind.

Purpose: We tested five different angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) as mitigators of experimental radiation nephropathy at drug doses calibrated to the plasma renin activity (PRA). This was done to determine whether all ACEI had the same efficacy as mitigators of radiation nephropathy when used at drug doses that gave equivalent suppression of the renin angiotensin system. Method: 10 Gy total body irradiation with bone marrow transplantation was used to cause radiation nephropathy in barrier-maintained rats. Equivalent ACEI doses were determined based on their effect to inhibit angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and raise the PRA in unirradiated animals. Results: PRA-equivalent doses were found for captopril, lisinopril, enalapril, ramipril and fosinopril. These doses overlap the human doses of these drugs on a body surface area basis. All ACE inhibitors, except fosinopril, mitigated radiation nephropathy; captopril was a somewhat better mitigator than lisinopril, enalapril or ramipril. Conclusions: Most, but not all, ACEI mitigate radiation nephropathy at doses that overlap their clinically-used doses (on a body surface area basis). Fosinopril is known to be an ineffective mitigator of radiation pneumonitis, and it also does not mitigate radiation nephropathy. These pre-clinical data are critical in planning human studies of the mitigation of normal tissue radiation injury.