Paul Leahy

Dr. Paul Leahy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2024 in Solar
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHussain Al Mahdi
Hussain Al Mahdi
Paul LeahyPaul Leahy
Paul Leahy
MAMohammad Alghoul
Mohammad Alghoul
Alan MorrisonAlan Morrison
Alan Morrison
With the global increase in the deployment of photovoltaic (PV) modules in recent years, the need to explore and understand their reported failure mechanisms has become crucial. Despite PV modules being considered reliable devices, failures and extreme degradations often occur. Some degradations and failures within the normal range may be minor and not cause significant harm. Others may initially be mild but can rapidly deteriorate, leading to catastrophic accidents, particularly in harsh environments. This paper conducts a state-of-the-art literature review to examine PV failures, their types, and their root causes based on the components of PV modules (from protective glass to junction box). It outlines the hazardous consequences arising from PV module failures and describes the potential damage they can bring to the PV system. The literature reveals that each component is susceptible to specific types of failure, with some components deteriorating on their own and others impacting additional PV components, leading to more severe failures. Finally, this review briefly summarises PV failure detection techniques, emphasising the significance of electrical characterisation techniques and underlining the importance of considering more electrical parameters. Most importantly, this review identifies the most prevalent degradation processes, laying the foundation for further investigation by the PV research community through modelling and experimental studies. This allows for early detection by comparing PV performance when failures or degradation occur to prevent serious progression. It is worth noting that most of the studies included in this review primarily focus on detailing failures and degradation observed in PV operations, which can be attributed to various factors, including the manufacturing process and other external influences. Hence, they provide explanations of these failure mechanisms and causes but do not extensively explore corrective actions or propose solutions based on either laboratory experiments or real-world experience. Although, within this field of study, there are corresponding studies that have designed experiments to suggest preventive measures and potential solutions, an in-depth review of those studies is beyond the scope of this paper. However, this paper, in turn, serves as a valuable resource for scholars by confining PV failures to critically evaluate available studies for preventative measures and corrective actions.

1 January 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANAngela J. Nagle
Angela J. Nagle
GMGerard Mullally
Gerard Mullally
Paul LeahyPaul Leahy
Paul Leahy
NDNiall P. Dunphy
Niall P. Dunphy
53,000 tonnes of blade waste from on-shore wind farms will potentially be generated in Ireland by 2040. The recycling of blades, which are made from composite material, is costly and thus far no high volume recycling solution exists. Repurposing blades into second life structures is an alternative which is gaining in popularity, but has many challenges. Green Public Procurement has the potential to help drive demand for blade products in Irish public works. The Re-Wind project has generated a Design Atlas with 47 blade product concepts and these are screened for their ability to overcome repurposing challenges. Three Irish scenarios are developed based on this ranking, maximal utilization of the blade, and on the end customer. Life Cycle Assessment is used to determine the marginal environmental impacts of the raw material substitution provided by the use of blade material. Focusing on greenhouse gas emissions, an estimated 342 kg CO2 e can be saved for every tonne of blade waste used in these scenarios. Blade substitution of steel products was found to provide the most impact, followed by substitution of concrete products. Although repurposing is unlikely to offer an end-of-life solution for all Irish blade waste, the use of 20% of this material annually would divert 315 tonnes of blade waste from landfill, as well as avoiding emissions of 71,820 kg CO2 e. Green procurement has the potential to create a demand for repurposed blade products, which in turn could create jobs in high unemployment areas. Utilization of repurposed, local material could contribute to creating resiliency in supply chains. Both job creation and supply chain resiliency are essential for a post-Covid recovery in Ireland.


21 January 2023 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QDQuang Vu Dinh
Quang Vu Dinh
VDVan Nguyen Dinh
Van Nguyen Dinh
HMHadi Mosadeghi
Hadi Mosadeghi
PPPedro H. Todesco Pereira
Pedro H. Todesco Pereira
Paul LeahyPaul Leahy
Paul Leahy

28 July 2022 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHM. Helbig
M. Helbig
TŽT. Živković
T. Živković
PAP. Alekseychik
P. Alekseychik
MAMika Aurela
Mika Aurela
TETarek El-Madany
Tarek El-Madany
SZS. Zaehle
S. Zaehle

20 November 2019 in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJoseph James Kelly
Joseph James Kelly
Paul LeahyPaul Leahy
Paul Leahy
The financial objective, when sizing a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) for installation in a microgrid, is to maximise the difference between discounted BESS benefits and discounted BESS costs. This may be described as maximising Annual Worth (AW). However, one drawback of sizing microgrid BESS using AW is that the scale of investment is not taken into consideration. This can lead to unrealistic BESS sizes. This paper presents two multi-objective optimisation (MOO) models to account for the scale of investment required in sizing BESS. The first model, Paired Comparison, utilises two objective functions: Daily Worth (DW), which maximises daily benefit cost differences a BESS installation provides a microgrid; and Daily Cost (DC), which minimises the daily cost of a BESS installation. The second model, called Rating Method, uses the objective functions DW and Daily Benefit-Cost Ratio (DBCR), the latter of which maximises the relative measure of BESS benefit and BESS cost. Both models are solved for a test microgrid system under three different scenarios using Compromise Programming (CP). For system designers who rank objective functions by importance, the Rating Method is the appropriate approach, whereas system designers who rank objective functions by absolute values should use Paired Comparison.