The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of distal femur (PPDFFx) after primary total knee arthroplasties is described around 0.3% and 2.5% and it is increasing as the number of patients with total knee arthroplasty continues to arise. surgical options treatments for PPDFFx include fixation in the form of eather Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), or conventional (non locked) plating, or locked plating such as the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS), or dynamic condylar screws. In recent years, however, the use of megaprostheses has been increasing. Patients with periprosthetic fractures of distal femur after primary total knee arthroplasties treated with ORIF or with the use of Distal femur replacement (DFR) were retrospectively analyzed in this to evaluate differences in intra-operative blood loss, need of blood trasfusion, weight bearing, range of motion, rate of complications, rate of revision surgery and functional outcome according Oxford Knee Score between two groups. Treatment of Periprosthetic distal femur fracture remains controversial. While ORIF seems to guarantee less percentage of complications and reoperation rate, those treated with megaprosthesis seem to gain better range of motion in a very short post-operative time. In the future it will be necessary to investigate with greater numbers possible advantages and disadvantages of the various treatments in periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have emerged as a focal point in the realm of orthopedics, garnering widespread attention owing to the escalating incidence rates and the profound impact they impose on patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). Year after year, there has been a growing trend in the analysis of multiple risk factors, complication rates, and surgical treatments in the field. This study aims to illuminate the status of the sex-related differences in periprosthetic joint infections and advance research in this field. Methods: A systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The final reference list comprised longitudinal studies (both retrospective and prospective) and randomized controlled trials. A sex-based analysis was conducted to assess differences between males and females. Results: A total of 312 studies were initially identified through online database searches and reference investigations. Nine studies were subsequently included in the review. Eight out of nine studies examined the risk of developing PJI after total joint replacement. Notably, only half of these studies demonstrated a statistically significant value, with a p value <0.05, indicating a higher risk of infectious complications in males compared to females. Conclusion: According to the current literature, there appears to be a propensity for males to develop periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty at a higher rate than the female population. Enhancing sex-related analysis in this field is imperative for gathering more robust evidence and insights.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor, predominantly affecting adolescents and young adults. Despite advances in surgery and multi-agent chemotherapy, survival rates for metastatic or recurrent OS remain poor, highlighting the need for novel prognostic and therapeutic strategies. This review integrates histopathologic, molecular, and immune perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of OS biology in the context of precision medicine. We discuss classic morphologic and radiographic features alongside recent insights into the tumor microenvironment, including the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and immune checkpoint expression. Emerging molecular markers, such as gene expression–based immune risk signatures, circulating tumor DNA, and gasdermin D overexpression, are evaluated for their prognostic and therapeutic relevance. Key dysregulated pathways, including WNT/β-catenin and JAK/STAT, are examined in relation to metastasis, chemoresistance, and immune evasion, with emphasis on current targeted approaches under development. By bridging histopathology, immunogenomics, and translational research, this work outlines how integrated biomarker assessment can refine patient stratification and guide the implementation of individualized treatment strategies in OS.

(1) Background: Some of the goals of orthopedic surgical oncology are saving limbs and function. The humerus is the third most frequent site in primary tumors and one of the most involved sites for metastases. Prosthetic replacement with modular megaprosthesis is one of the treatment choices, but there are several types of complications, such as problems with function and pain. The aim of our study is to assess functional outcomes and shoulder instability in the reconstruction of proximal humerus metastases. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Twenty-eight patients, with proximal humerus metastases, admitted to the department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of our University Hospital between 2014 and 2022 were recruited. Each patient underwent resection and prosthetic replacement surgery with modular megaprosthesis. Clinical evaluation was assessed through MSTS score, WOSI index, and DASH score. (3) Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. Fairly good results, especially regarding pain, function, and emotional acceptance, were obtained in all three tests: DASH, MSTS, and WOSI. Patients who reported shoulder instability actually have worse outcomes than those who report having stable shoulders. In addition, patients with a resection >10 cm have worse outcomes than those who had a resection of 10 cm. No significant differences were found between the deltopectoral approach group and the lateral approach group. (4) Conclusions: Reconstructive surgery with megaprosthesis of the proximal humerus in patients with metastases can be considered a treatment option, especially in patients with pathological fractures or injuries with a high risk of fracture and good life expectancy. This study shows how this type of surgery affects instability, but in terms of functionality, pain, and patient satisfaction, it gives satisfactory results.

Background and aim: Cancers are one of the most frequent causes of death and disability in humans. Skeletal involvement has a major impact on the quality of life and prognosis of cancer patients. Electrochemotherapy is a palliative and minimally invasive oncologic treatment that was first used to treat subcutaneous nodules for malignant tumors. The aim of our review is to evaluate the results of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of bone metastases. Methods: A systematic review of the literature indexed in the PubMed MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases using the search key words “electrochemotherapy” AND (“metastasis” OR “metastases”) was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses was followed. Inclusion criteria were proven involvement of the appendicular skeleton in metastatic carcinoma or melanoma, through at least one percutaneous electrochemotherapy session on the metastatic bone lesion. The exclusion criterion was no skeletal metastatic involvement. Results: Eight articles were finally included. We reached a population of 246 patients. The mean age and follow up were 60.1 years old and 11.4 months, respectively. The most represented primary tumor was breast cancer (18.9%). A total of 250 bone lesions were treated with electrochemotherapy. According to RECIST criteria, in our population we observed 55.5% stable diseases. The mean pre-electrochemotherapy VAS value was 6.9, which lowered to 2.7 after treatment. Adverse events occurred in 3.4% of patients. Conclusions: Electrochemotherapy as a minimally invasive and tissue-sparing treatment should be considered for patients with no other alternative to obtain tumor control and improvement in quality of life.

Background: Total hip and knee arthroplasty are common procedures for end-stage osteoarthritis, with rehabilitation playing a central role in functional recovery. Conventional face-to-face programs are often limited by accessibility, costs, and logistical barriers. Digital telerehabilitation has been increasingly investigated as an alternative. This review aims to summarize current evidence on its effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction, and economic impact. Materials and Methods: A narrative review was conducted using Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus up to April 2025. Randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies evaluating telerehabilitation after total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Data were extracted on functional performance, pain, autonomy, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Across multiple RCTs, telerehabilitation produced functional outcomes generally comparable to conventional rehabilitation, with some studies reporting superior short-term improvements. For example, in a retrospective trial, Timed Up and Go improved by −8.0 ± 2.6 s in the digital group versus −4.9 ± 2.5 s with standard care (p < 0.01). Tablet-assisted programs reduced Five Times Sit-to-Stand times to 11.7 s at 6 months compared with 14.7 s in controls (p = 0.05). In hip arthroplasty, digital rehabilitation resulted in higher active flexion (97.4° vs. 89.9°, p = 0.018) and abduction (51.7° vs. 43.8°, p = 0.024). Quality-of-life measures, such as EQ-5D VAS, also showed improvements (82.9 ± 4.3 vs. 68.7 ± 4.6 at 6 months). Some studies reported higher patient satisfaction, for instance, a VR-based RCT found GPE at day 15 of 4.76 ± 0.43 in the intervention group versus 3.96 ± 0.65 in controls (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Telerehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty appears to produce short-term functional and patient-reported outcomes comparable to conventional rehabilitation in selected populations. Evidence of superiority is limited and heterogeneous, and long-term effectiveness, equity, and cost-effectiveness remain uncertain. Heterogeneity in protocols and digital literacy barriers highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further independent validation.