Pierluigi Russo

Dr. Pierluigi Russo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPierluigi Russo
Pierluigi Russo
Francesco Pio BizzarriFrancesco Pio Bizzarri
Francesco Pio Bizzarri
Giovanni Battista FilomenaGiovanni Battista Filomena
Giovanni Battista Filomena
Filippo MarinoFilippo Marino
Filippo Marino
RIRoberto Iacovelli
Roberto Iacovelli
Nazario FoschiNazario Foschi
Nazario Foschi
Background: The Y chromosome (ChrY) is essential for male sex determination and spermatogenesis. However, recent studies have revealed its broader role in various physiological processes and disease susceptibility, including cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases like MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The review included clinical and preclinical studies in animals and humans focusing on the role of LoY in urological tumors. Data on the frequency of LoY, its clinical implications, and underlying mechanisms were extracted and analyzed. Results: The evidence suggests that LoY is associated with an increased risk of urologic neoplasms, potentially serving as an early marker of genomic instability. Studies reveal that LoY in urologic cancers correlates with worse survival outcomes and may contribute to tumor progression. LoY may interfere with chromatin structure and epigenetic regulation, suggesting its role as a contributor to early tumorigenesis. Conclusions: LoY appears to be a structural aberration with unique biological and clinical relevance in urologic cancers, possibly serving as a biomarker for genomic instability. Further research is necessary to identify specific Y-linked genes affected by LoY, potentially informing targeted therapies and early diagnostic strategies for these cancers.

22 November 2023 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPierluigi Russo
Pierluigi Russo
Filippo MarinoFilippo Marino
Filippo Marino
FRFrancesco Rossi
Francesco Rossi
FBFrancesco Pio Bizzarri
Francesco Pio Bizzarri
Mauro RagoneseMauro Ragonese
Mauro Ragonese
Nazario FoschiNazario Foschi
Nazario Foschi
Background and Objectives: To assess the potential prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in predicting oncological outcomes in a cohort of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Materials and Methods: From 2016 to 2022, a retrospective monocentric study enrolled 193 patients who were divided into two groups based on their SII levels using the optimal cutoff determined by the Youden index. The SII was obtained from a preoperative blood test approximately one month before RC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the capacity of SII to predict lymph node invasion (N), advanced pT stage (pT3/pT4), and locally advanced condition at the time of RC. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for preoperative and postoperative features were used to analyze the prognostic effect of SII on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The optimal cutoff value of the SII was 640.27. An elevated SII was seen in 113 (58.5%) patients. Using the multivariable preoperative logistic regression models, an elevated SII was correlated with nodal invasion (N; p = 0.03), advanced pT stage (p = 0.04), and locally advanced disease (p = 0.005), with enhancement of AUCs for predicting locally advanced disease (p = 0.04). In multivariable Cox regression models that considered preoperative clinicopathologic factors, an elevated SII was linked to poorer RFS (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.01). Moreover, on multivariable Cox regression postoperative models, a high SII was linked to RFS (p = 0.004) and to OS (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In this monocentric retrospective study, higher preoperative SII values predicted worse oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) who underwent RC.

24 February 2023 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCChiara Ciccarese
Chiara Ciccarese
ASAlessandro Strusi
Alessandro Strusi
DADaniela Arduini
Daniela Arduini
PRPierluigi Russo
Pierluigi Russo
GPGiuseppe Palermo
Giuseppe Palermo
RIRoberto Iacovelli
Roberto Iacovelli
Standard treatment for localized non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is radical or partial nephrectomy. However, after radical surgery, patients with stage II-III have a substantial risk of relapse (around 35%). To date a unique standardized classification for the risk of disease recurrence still lack. Moreover, in the last years great attention has been focused in developing systemic therapies with the aim of improving the disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk patients, with negative results from adjuvant VEGFR-TKIs. Therefore, there is still a need for developing effective treatments for radically resected RCC patients who are at intermediate/high risk of relapse. Recently, interesting results came from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, with a significant benefit in terms of disease-free survival from adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the conflicting results of diverse clinical trials investigating different ICI-based regimens in the adjuvant setting, together with the still immature data on the overall survival advantage of immunotherapy, requires careful considerations. Furthermore, several questions remain unanswered, primarily regarding the selection of patients who could benefit the most from immunotherapy. In this review, we have summarized the main clinical trials investigating adjuvant therapy in RCC, with a particular focus on immunotherapy. Moreover, we have analyzed the crucial issue of patients' stratification according to the risk of disease recurrence, and we have described the possible future prospective and novel agents under evaluation for perioperative and adjuvant therapies.

28 March 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAchille Aveta
Achille Aveta
VIVincenzo Iossa
Vincenzo Iossa
GSGianluca Spena
Gianluca Spena
PCPaolo Conforti
Paolo Conforti
GPGiovanni Pagano
Giovanni Pagano
Savio Domenico PandolfoSavio Domenico Pandolfo
Savio Domenico Pandolfo
This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques—RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE—elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.

11 February 2025 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PRPierluigi Russo
Pierluigi Russo
NFNazario Foschi
Nazario Foschi
GPGiuseppe Palermo
Giuseppe Palermo
GMGiuseppe Maioriello
Giuseppe Maioriello
NLNicolò Lentini
Nicolò Lentini
BRBernardo Rocco
Bernardo Rocco
This analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the presurgical systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in individuals undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). In this retrospective study, 228 were categorized into 2 cohorts depending on their SIRI levels using the best cut-off determined by the Youden Index. The association between SIRI and lymph node metastasis (N), advanced pT stage (pT3/pT4), and loco-regional extended state were analyzed at the time of surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of SIRI on time to relapse, tumor-specific survival, and survival rates. The additional medical advantage was evaluated through decision curve analysis (DCA). High and low SIRI group was obtained using the best cut-off value (1.71×109/l). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, elevated SIRI was significantly associated with advanced pT stage (P = 0.003) and loco-regional extended state (P = 0.003). On multivariable Cox regression models based on presurgical clinicopathological factors, an augmented SIRI was linked to poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.035), with the improvement of the concordance index just for RFS. In DCAs, incorporating SIRI yielded results equal to or better than those of the model without SIRI for all outcomes models. It demonstrated improvements in net benefit at probability thresholds up to 50% for the model adjusted with preoperative factors for RFS and for postoperative factors in CSS and OS. SIRI is an innovative prognostic indicator and a potential biomarker that can enhance conventional medical pathological evaluation and improve the personalization of clinical treatment strategies for bladder cancer patients following RC.

26 April 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo MarinoFilippo Marino
Filippo Marino
Stefano MorettoStefano Moretto
Stefano Moretto
FRFrancesco Rossi
Francesco Rossi
Carlo GandiCarlo Gandi
Carlo Gandi
Filippo GaviFilippo Gavi
Filippo Gavi
Emilio SaccoEmilio Sacco
Emilio Sacco
Background/Objectives: to assess surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the novel Hugo™ RAS system. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Eligible papers included studies involving adult males undergoing RARP with the Hugo™ RAS platform, with at least ten patients analyzed. The pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Results: Quantitative analysis was conducted on 12 studies including 579 patients. The pooled median docking time, console time, and operative time were 11 min (95% CI 7.95–14.50; I2 = 98.4%, ten studies), 142 min (95% CI 119.74–164.68; I2 = 96.5%, seven studies), and 176 min (95% CI 148.33–203.76; I2 = 96.3%, seven studies), respectively. The pooled median estimated blood loss was 223 mL (95% CI 166.75–280.17; I2 = 96.5%, eleven studies). The pooled median length of hospital stay and time to catheter removal were 2.8 days (95% CI 1.67–3.89; I2 = 100%, ten studies) and 8.3 days (95% CI 5.53–11.09; I2 = 100%, eight studies), respectively. The pooled rate of postoperative CD ≥ 2 complications was 4.1% (95% CI 1–8.5; I2 = 63.6%, eleven studies). The pooled rate of positive surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA were 20% (95% CI 12.6–28.5; I2 = 71.5%, nine studies) and 94.2% (95% CI 87.7–98.6; I2 = 48.9%, three studies), respectively. At three months, a pooled rate of social continence of 81.9% (95% CI 73.8–88.9; I2 = 66.7%, seven studies) was found. Erectile function at six months was 31% in one study. Conclusions: despite the preliminary nature of the evidence, this systematic review and pooled analysis underscores the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the Hugo™ RAS system in the context of RARP.