Feeding increased volumes of milk in the preweaning phase has been shown to improve growth, morbidity and mortality rates in calves (Bos Taurus). This experiment enlisted 20 Holstein-Friesian dairy replacement calves from birth until weaning (at 10 weeks of age) and assessed the effect of feeding either 4 L (Low) or 8 L (High) of milk per calf per day on their growth, immune competence and metabolic characteristics. The responsiveness of these systems was compared through a vaccination immune challenge. Calves in the High treatment group were significantly heavier from two weeks of age and were 19 kg heavier than calves in the Low treatment group at weaning. Calves in the High treatment group also exhibited greater immune responses, with significantly higher white cell counts and neutrophil counts than calves in the Low treatment group post-vaccination. Calves in the High treatment group also had lower beta-hydroxybutyrate both pre- and post-vaccination, and higher glucose and insulin levels post-vaccination, indicating superior metabolic characteristics. Calves had ad libitum access to lucerne hay (Medicago sativa) and a commercial concentrate. Solid feed intakes were mostly the same between treatments, with differences in hay intake only detected at 7 and 8 weeks of age. Results from this experiment are indicative of a positive influence of accelerated preweaning nutrition on growth, immune response and metabolic characteristics.
This experiment investigated the preservation effects of two preweaning milk feeding nutritional treatments (High: 8 L and Low: 4 L milk per day) on 20, 12-month-old Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers (Bos taurus). A vaccination immune challenge was initially implemented on these 20 heifers at 6 weeks of age and the findings indicated superior growth, immune competence and favorable metabolic characteristics from the calves that had been fed 8 L milk per day. Postweaning, all heifers were treated the same under non-experimental conditions, and the immune challenge was repeated at 12 months of age for the current experiment. Consistent with the first immune challenge, heifers from the High preweaning treatment group still had higher white cell count and neutrophil count, indicating superior immune competence. The differences found in metabolic biomarkers, including beta-hydroxybutyrate, glucose and insulin, in the preweaning phase had disappeared, suggesting these biomarkers were influenced directly by the nutritional input at the time. There were no differences in NEFA levels between treatments at either stage of development. Postweaning, the heifers from the Low preweaning treatment group experienced accelerated growth with slightly numerically higher ADG (0.83 kg/day vs. 0.89 kg/day), resulting in the initial differences in bodyweight recorded at weaning being eliminated by 13 months of age. These results are evidence of a form of immunological developmental programming as a result of accelerated preweaning nutrition and therefore, are not supportive of restricted milk feeding of calves.
This experiment aimed to assess the effects of both preweaning nutrition and postweaning growth rate on the resilience of dairy heifers from birth to 20 months of age. Immune competence and metabolic characteristics were assessed via repeated vaccine immune challenges throughout early life. Heifers were subject to either a high or low preweaning nutritional treatment (high: 8 L vs. low: 4 L of milk per day). Calves in these treatment groups were then equally divided into either a high or low postweaning growth rate treatment until 20 months of age. Nutritional intake, growth and metabolic data can be found in a companion paper, while the current paper outlines the responses to the three immune challenges. In the preweaning phase, heifers on a high milk volume had superior immune competence, demonstrated by higher monocyte and eosinophil counts. All other immune biomarkers were not different between treatments. By 8 months of age, the differences in monocytes were lost; however, the differences in preweaning eosinophil counts remained at 8 months and through to 13 months of age. At 13 months of age, there were also three-way interaction effects of preweaning nutrition, postweaning growth rate and vaccination for white blood cell count and neutrophil count; however, the trends in these responses appear random and do not align towards any clear advantages of pre- or postweaning nutrition. Metabolic responses to the immune challenges do not suggest any form of carryover effect from the preweaning phase and seemed to reflect the nutritional input at the time.