Gerhard W. Weber

Prof. Dr. Gerhard W. Weber


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Israel HershkovitzIsrael Hershkovitz
Israel Hershkovitz
GWGerhard W. Weber
Gerhard W. Weber
RQRolf Quam
Rolf Quam
MDMathieu Duval
Mathieu Duval
RGRainer Grün
Rainer Grün
MWMina Weinstein-Evron
Mina Weinstein-Evron
Earliest modern humans out of Africa: Recent paleoanthropological studies have suggested that modern humans migrated from Africa as early as the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, 120,000 years ago. Hershkovitzet al.now suggest that early modern humans were already present outside of Africa more than 55,000 years earlier (see the Perspective by Stringer and Galway-Witham). During excavations of sediments at Mount Carmel, Israel, they found a fossil of a mouth part, a left hemimaxilla, with almost complete dentition.The sediments contain a series of well-defined hearths and a rich stone-based industry, as well as abundant animal remains. Analysis of the human remains, and dating of the site and the fossil itself, indicate a likely age of at least 177,000 years for the fossil—making it the oldest member of theHomo sapiensclade found outside Africa.Science, this issue p.456; see also p.389

14 April 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPhilipp Gunz
Philipp Gunz
FBFred L. Bookstein
Fred L. Bookstein
PMPhilipp Mitteroecker
Philipp Mitteroecker
ASAndrea Stadlmayr
Andrea Stadlmayr
HSHorst Seidler
Horst Seidler
GWGerhard W. Weber
Gerhard W. Weber
The interpretation of genetic evidence regarding modern human origins depends, among other things, on assessments of the structure and the variation of ancient populations. Because we lack genetic data from the time when the first anatomically modern humans appeared, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago, instead we exploit the phenotype of neurocranial geometry to compare the variation in early modern human fossils with that in other groups of fossil Homo and recent modern humans. Variation is assessed as the mean-squared Procrustes distance from the group average shape in a representation based on several hundred neurocranial landmarks and semilandmarks. We find that the early modern group has more shape variation than any other group in our sample, which covers 1.8 million years, and that they are morphologically similar to recent modern humans of diverse geographically dispersed populations but not to archaic groups. Of the currently competing models of modern human origins, some are inconsistent with these findings. Rather than a single out-of-Africa dispersal scenario, we suggest that early modern humans were already divided into different populations in Pleistocene Africa, after which there followed a complex migration pattern. Our conclusions bear implications for the inference of ancient human demography from genetic models and emphasize the importance of focusing research on those early modern humans, in particular, in Africa.

1 May 2000 in Journal of Human Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFDean Falk
Dean Falk
JRJohn C. Redmond
John C. Redmond
JGJohn Guyera
John Guyera
CCC. Conroy
C. Conroy
WRWolfgang Recheisc
Wolfgang Recheisc
HSHorst Seidlerd
Horst Seidlerd

1 February 1998 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GWGerhard W. Weber
Gerhard W. Weber
HPHermann Prossinger
Hermann Prossinger
HSHorst Seidler
Horst Seidler

24 November 2014 in American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWGerhard W. Weber
Gerhard W. Weber
Comparative morphology, dealing with the diversity of form and shape, and functional morphology, the study of the relationship between the structure and the function of an organism's parts, are both important subdisciplines in biological research. Virtual anthropology (VA) contributes to comparative morphology by taking advantage of technological innovations, and it also offers new opportunities for functional analyses. It exploits digital technologies and pools experts from different domains such as anthropology, primatology, medicine, paleontology, mathematics, statistics, computer science, and engineering. VA as a technical term was coined in the late 1990s from the perspective of anthropologists with the intent of being mostly applied to biological questions concerning recent and fossil hominoids. More generally, however, there are advanced methods to study shape and size or to manipulate data digitally suitable for application to all kinds of primates, mammals, other vertebrates, and invertebrates or to issues regarding plants, tools, or other objects. In this sense, we could also call the field “virtual morphology.” The approach yields permanently available virtual copies of specimens and data that comprehensively quantify geometry, including previously neglected anatomical regions. It applies advanced statistical methods, supports the reconstruction of specimens based on reproducible manipulations, and promotes the acquisition of larger samples by data sharing via electronic archives. Finally, it can help identify new, hidden traits, which is particularly important in paleoanthropology, where the scarcity of material demands extracting information from fragmentary remains. This contribution presents a current view of the six main work steps of VA: digitize, expose, compare, reconstruct, materialize, and share. The VA machinery has also been successfully used in biomechanical studies which simulate the stress and strains appearing in structures. Although methodological issues remain to be solved before results from the two domains can be fully integrated, the various overlaps and cross‐fertilizations suggest the widespread appearance of a “virtual functional morphology” in the near future. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 156:22–42, 2015. © 2014 American Association of Physical Anthropologists

25 June 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Israel HershkovitzIsrael Hershkovitz
Israel Hershkovitz
HMHila May
Hila May
RSRachel Sarig
Rachel Sarig
APAriel Pokhojaev
Ariel Pokhojaev
DGDominique Grimaud-Hervé
Dominique Grimaud-Hervé
YZYossi Zaidner
Yossi Zaidner
Middle Pleistocene Homo in the Levant: Our understanding of the origin, distribution, and evolution of early humans and their close relatives has been greatly refined by recent new information. Adding to this trend, Hershkovitz et al. have uncovered evidence of a previously unknown archaic Homo population, the “Nesher Ramla Homo ” (see the Perspective by Mirazon Lahr). The authors present comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analyses of fossilized remains from a site in Israel dated to 140,000 to 120,000 years ago indicating the presence of a previously unrecognized group of hominins representing the last surviving populations of Middle Pleistocene Homo in Europe, southwest Asia, and Africa. In a companion paper, Zaidner et al. present the radiometric ages, stone tool assemblages, faunal assemblages, and other behavioral and environmental data associated with these fossils. This evidence shows that these hominins had fully mastered technology that until only recently was linked to either Homo sapiens or Neanderthals. Nesher Ramla Homo was an efficient hunter of large and small game, used wood for fuel, cooked or roasted meat, and maintained fires. These findings provide archaeological support for cultural interactions between different human lineages during the Middle Paleolithic, suggesting that admixture between Middle Pleistocene Homo and H. sapiens had already occurred by this time. Science , abh3169 and abh3020, this issue p. 1424 and p. 1429 ; see also abj3077, p. 1395