Daniela Kempa

Dr. Daniela Kempa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristina von Haaren
Christina von Haaren
DKDaniela Kempa
Daniela Kempa
KVKatrin Vogel
Katrin Vogel
SRStefan Rüter
Stefan Rüter

5 March 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDaniela Kempa
Daniela Kempa
LKLeena Karrasch
Leena Karrasch
Torsten SchlurmannTorsten Schlurmann
Torsten Schlurmann
MPMartin Prominski
Martin Prominski
OLOliver Lojek
Oliver Lojek
Nils GosebergNils Goseberg
Nils Goseberg
Novel strategies in coastal protection are needed to cope with climate change-induced sea level rise. They aim at the sustainable development of coastal areas in light of intensification and land use changes. A promising approach is the design of nature-based solutions (NbS), complementing the safety levels of technical infrastructure. However, NbS lack a widespread and large-scale implementation. To address this deficit, co-design concepts are needed that combine experiences from science and practice. This work presents and discusses the approach of a coast-specific real-world laboratory (RwL) addressing the inclusive design of ecosystem-based coastal protection. Strategies of RwLs are applied for the first time in a coastal context along the North Sea coastline in Germany. We found the concept of RwLs suitable for coastal transdisciplinary research, although adaptions in the spatial reference level or flexibility in location and time of experimentation are necessary. A profound actor analysis is indispensable to specify participatory processes and interaction levels. A criteria-based cooperative selection of RwL sites helps to reveal and solve conflicting interests to achieve trust between science and practice. Addressing site-specific characteristics and practitioners’ needs, our coastal RwL provides a mutual learning space to develop and test NbS to complement technical coastal protection.

1 September 2013 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDaniela Kempa
Daniela Kempa

26 June 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
DKDaniela Kempa
Daniela Kempa
ALAndrew A. Lovett
Andrew A. Lovett

9 February 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DKDaniela Kempa
Daniela Kempa
LKLeena Karrasch
Leena Karrasch
Torsten SchlurmannTorsten Schlurmann
Torsten Schlurmann
MPMartin Prominski
Martin Prominski
OLOliver Lojek
Oliver Lojek
Nils GosebergNils Goseberg
Nils Goseberg
Novel strategies in coastal protection are needed to cope with climate change-induced sea level rise. They aim at the sustainable development of coastal areas in light of an intensification and land use changes. A promising approach is the design of nature-based solutions (NbS), complementing the safety levels of technical infrastructures. However, NbS lack a widespread and large-scale implementation. To address this deficit, co-design concepts are needed that combine experiences from science and practice. This work presents and discusses the approach of a coast-specific real-world laboratory (RwL) addressing the inclusive design of ecosystem-based coastal protection. Strategies of RwLs are applied for the first time in a coastal context along the North Sea coastline in Germany. We found the concept of RwLs suitable for coastal transdisciplinary research, although adaptions in the spatial reference level or flexibility in location and time of experimentation are necessary. A profound actor analysis is indispensable to specify participatory processes and interaction levels. A criteria-based cooperative selection of RwL sites helps to reveal and solve conflicting interests to achieve trust between science and practice. Addressing site-specific characteristics and practitioners’ needs, our coastal RwL provides a mutual learning space to develop and test NbS to complement technical coastal protection.

11 September 2026 in Urban Transformations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWChristian Wagner-Ahlfs
Christian Wagner-Ahlfs
MBMaria Busse
Maria Busse
MEMarkus Egermann
Markus Egermann
KGKai de Graaf
Kai de Graaf
MGMarion Glaser
Marion Glaser
CWClaudia Wolff
Claudia Wolff
Real-world laboratories (RwLs) have emerged as a scientifically grounded, sustainability-oriented, transdisciplinary approach to support transformative change through the co-production of knowledge via engagement and experimentation. While originally rooted in urban settings, real-world laboratories have increasingly been developed in rural and marine areas. Urban, rural, and marine areas have unique contextual characteristics that remain insufficiently addressed in both research and practice. This paper offers a first comparative view on real-world laboratories in urban, rural, and marine settings by using four different epistemological and ontological perspectives in spatial science: bio-physical, social-constructivist, geographic, and social-materialistic. We highlight key differences and investigate the implications of identified differences for transformative governance.