ANUPAM GOGOI

Dr. ANUPAM GOGOI

Department of Molecular Plant Biology, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2017 in Planta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
NSNomi Sarmah
Nomi Sarmah
AKAthanasios Kaldis
Athanasios Kaldis
DPDionysios Perdikis
Dionysios Perdikis
AVAndreas Voloudakis
Andreas Voloudakis

1 June 2022 in Fungal Biology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BGBikal Ghimire
Bikal Ghimire
MSMarcia Saraiva
Marcia Saraiva
CAChristian B. Andersen
Christian B. Andersen
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
Mona SalehMona Saleh
Mona Saleh
MBMay B. Brurberg
May B. Brurberg

12 September 2023 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRaghuram Badmi
Raghuram Badmi
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
BPBarbara Doyle Prestwich
Barbara Doyle Prestwich
Strawberry is a high-value commercial crop and a model for the economically important Rosaceae family. Strawberry is vulnerable to attack by many pathogens that can affect different parts of the plant, including the shoot, root, flowers, and berries. To restrict pathogen growth, strawberry produce a repertoire of secondary metabolites that have an important role in defense against diseases. Terpenes, allergen-like pathogenesis-related proteins, and flavonoids are three of the most important metabolites involved in strawberry defense. Genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites are induced upon pathogen attack in strawberry, suggesting their transcriptional activation leads to a higher accumulation of the final compounds. The production of secondary metabolites is also influenced by the beneficial microbes associated with the plant and its environmental factors. Given the importance of the secondary metabolite pathways in strawberry defense, we provide a comprehensive overview of their literature and their role in the defense responses of strawberry. We focus on terpenoids, allergens, and flavonoids, and discuss their involvement in the strawberry microbiome in the context of defense responses. We discuss how the biosynthetic genes of these metabolites could be potential targets for gene editing through CRISPR-Cas9 techniques for strawberry crop improvement.

13 June 2019 in Biologia plantarum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
AKA. Kaldis
A. Kaldis
IDIndranil Dasgupta
Indranil Dasgupta
BBB.K. Borah
B.K. Borah
AVAndreas Voloudakis
Andreas Voloudakis
Biologia plantarum, an international journal for experimental botany founded in 1959 by Professor Bohumil N?mec. Covers all branches of experimental botany ranging from molecular biology and biotechnology to whole-plant and stand functioning.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
ELErik Lysøe
Erik Lysøe
HEHåvard Eikemo
Håvard Eikemo
ASArne Stensvand
Arne Stensvand
JDJahn Davik
Jahn Davik
MBMay Bente Brurberg
May Bente Brurberg
Crown rot, caused by Phytophthora cactorum, is a devastating disease of strawberry. While most commercial octoploid strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) are generally susceptible, the diploid species Fragaria vesca is a potential source of resistance genes to P. cactorum. We previously reported several F. vesca genotypes with varying degrees of resistance to P. cactorum. To gain insights into the strawberry defence mechanisms, comparative transcriptome profiles of two resistant genotypes (NCGR1603 and Bukammen) and a susceptible genotype (NCGR1218) of F. vesca were analysed by RNA-Seq after wounding and subsequent inoculation with P. cactorum. Differential gene expression analysis identified several defence-related genes that are highly expressed in the resistant genotypes relative to the susceptible genotype in response to P. cactorum after wounding. These included putative disease resistance (R) genes encoding receptor-like proteins, receptor-like kinases, nucleotide-binding sites, leucine-rich repeat proteins, RPW8-type disease resistance proteins, and ‘pathogenesis-related protein 1’. Seven of these R-genes were expressed only in the resistant genotypes and not in the susceptible genotype, and these appeared to be present only in the genomes of the resistant genotypes, as confirmed by PCR analysis. We previously reported a single major gene locus RPc-1 (Resistance to Phytophthora cactorum 1) in F. vesca that contributed resistance to P. cactorum. Here, we report that 4–5% of the genes (35–38 of ca 800 genes) in the RPc-1 locus are differentially expressed in the resistant genotypes compared to the susceptible genotype after inoculation with P. cactorum. In particular, we identified three defence-related genes encoding wall-associated receptor-like kinase 3, receptor-like protein 12, and non-specific lipid-transfer protein 1-like that were highly expressed in the resistant genotypes compared to the susceptible one. The present study reports several novel candidate disease resistance genes that warrant further investigation for their role in plant defence against P. cactorum.

1 May 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ANUPAM GOGOIANUPAM GOGOI
ANUPAM GOGOI
MPMandeep Poudel
Mandeep Poudel
JSJagajjit Sahu
Jagajjit Sahu
GBGeetanjali Baruah
Geetanjali Baruah