The frequency of HER2 overexpression in bladder cancer is reported as 9%-61%. HER2 alteration correlates with aggressive disease in bladder cancer. Traditional anti-HER2 targeted therapy has failed to show clinical benefits in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma . The information on pathologically proven patients with urothelial carcinoma with detected HER2 status was collected from the database of Peking University Cancer Hospital. The HER2 expression, as well as its association with clinical characteristics and prognosis, was analyzed. A total of 284 consecutive patients with urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. HER2 was positive (IHC 2+/3+) in 44% of urothelial carcinoma. HER2 positivity was found more frequent in UCB than in UTUC (51% vs. 38%). Stage, radical surgery, and histological variant were associated with survival (P < .05). For metastatic patients, multivariate analysis shows that 3 indicators, including liver metastasis, the number of involved organs, and anemia, are independent risk factors of prognosis. Receiving immunotherapy or disitamab vedotin (DV) treatment is an independent protecting factor. The survival of patients with low HER2 expression was also significantly improved by the treatment of DV (P < .001). HER2 expression (IHC 1+, 2+, 3+) was associated with a better prognosis in this population. DV has improved the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma in the real world. With the new-generation anti-HER2 ADC treatment, HER2 expression is no longer a poor prognostic factor.

Background: OH2 is an oncolytic virus derived from herpes simplex virus type 2. A phase Ia/Ib clinical trial in China was conducted in patients with unresected stage III–IV melanoma, the majority of whom had the acral type, to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of OH2. Methods: The trial enrolled patients with histologically confirmed unresectable stage III or advanced stage IV melanoma. In phase Ia, nine patients received OH2 single-dose treatment across three dose levels (10⁶, 10⁷, and 10⁸ CCID₅₀/mL, where CCID₅₀ represents cell culture infectious dose 50%) while six patients underwent multidose therapy. Phase Ib expanded the proposed dose. Antitumor efficacy was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and immune-RECIST guidelines. NCT04386967 is the clinical trial identifier. Results: All 44 patients were enrolled. OH2 was well tolerated without serious adverse events (AEs) or deaths reported. No Grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs occurred. In phase Ia, the 1-year survival rate was 92.9% (95% CI, 59.1% to 99.0%), with a median overall survival of 28.9 months (95% CI, 12.7 to not reached). In phase Ib, 10 patients achieved immune-partial response (iPR)/partial response (PR), yielding an objective response rate (ORR) of 37.0% (95% CI, 19.4% to 57.6%), with 6 patients still responding. The rate of the durable response (PR or complete response lasting at least 6 months) was at least 29.6% (8/27). Notably, 7 of 12 III–IVM1a patients who previously received programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy achieved iPR/PR, with an ORR of 58.3% (95% CI, 27.7% to 84.8%) and a disease control rate of 75.0% (95% CI, 42.8% to 94.5%). Biomarker analysis indicated that elevated baseline neutrophil activation state correlated with poorer clinical outcomes. A phase III clinical trial is ongoing in China (NCT05868707). Conclusions: OH2 oncolytic virotherapy exhibited a favorable safety profile without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and demonstrated durable antitumor efficacy in patients with melanoma, especially in those who had progressed on anti-PD-1 treatment. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04386967.

Background Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has become the new standard of care for stage III melanoma. This study sought to describe the metabolic changes seen with fludeoxyglucose-18-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with melanoma and explore associations with pathological response and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Methods Data from patients with macroscopic stage III nodal melanoma treated with neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor therapy were pooled from five melanoma centers. All patients underwent baseline and preoperative FDG-PET and CT assessments, and all had surgery. Pathological response was determined using the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium criteria, radiological response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and FDG-PET response using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. The primary endpoint was to explore the associations of metabolic and radiological responses with pathological response; secondary endpoints were RFS outcomes stratified by each response category. Results 115 patients were included, 69% male, median age 59 years (27–92), 43% BRAF mutant, and median follow-up was 22.2 months (95% CI 13.7 to 26.4). 40 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy, 20 patients received pembrolizumab combined with lenvatinib, and 55 patients received ipilimumab and nivolumab. The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 62%, and the pathological complete response rate was 51%. RECIST response underestimated pathological response; patients achieving RECIST stable disease (38%) had a 50% chance of achieving MPR. The FDG-PET metabolic response rate was 73%, with most achieving an MPR (80%), especially in patients with a complete metabolic response (CMR, 96% MPR). A small proportion of patients (10%) had stable metabolic disease on FDG-PET, and all these patients were non-MPR. Patients with progressive metabolic disease were also in the majority non-MPR (79%). Patients with MPR, complete response/partial response on CT, and CMR/partial metabolic response on FDG-PET had a favorable 24-month RFS (95.6%, 97.3%, and 93.7%, respectively), with FDG-PET able to identify a greater proportion of patients with favorable progression-free survival (PFS) than pathology or CT (73%, 62%, and 43%, respectively). Conclusion Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has high FDG-PET response rates in melanoma. FDG-PET response associates with pathological response and confers impressive RFS, suggesting this could be an important clinical tool.

Acral melanoma (AM) is less responsive to immunotherapy than nonacral cutaneous melanoma. Variable responses are seen during immunotherapy, including pseudoprogression, hyperprogressive disease (HPD) and heterogeneous responses. There are currently no studies on the response patterns of patients with AM treated with immunotherapy and the impact on the outcome. To evaluate the response patterns and prognosis of patients with AM treated with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 antibodies. Patients with advanced AM treated prospectively in five clinical trials of anti-PD-1 monotherapy at Peking University Cancer Hospital were included. Responses of individual metastases and heterogeneous responses were evaluated during immunotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to identify the possible predictive factors and generate a nomogram to predict the risk of 1-year and 2-year mortality. The overall response rate was 18·0%, the disease control rate was 36·1%, median progression-free survival was 3·5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·7–5·3] and median overall survival was 17·5 months (95% CI 15·1–19·9) for anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Overall, 9·8% of patients met the criteria of HPD, and displayed a dramatically worse outcome than patients without HPD. In total, 369 metastatic lesions were assessed, with the highest response rate in lymph nodes (20·4%) and the lowest in the liver (5·6%). Homogeneous response, heterogeneous response and heterogeneous or homogeneous progression had different prognoses from the best to the worst. A predictive model was constructed and achieved good accuracy with a C-index of 0·73 (95% CI 0·63–0·84) in the training set and 0·74 (95% CI 0·61–0·86) in the validation set. HPD during immunotherapy serves as an essential biomarker of poor prognosis in advanced AM. Metastases in different sites respond distinctively to immunotherapy. Clinically heterogeneous responses to immunotherapy affect the outcome of patients. A predictive model was built to distinguish the prognosis of acral melanoma under immunotherapy.

Background: Accumulating data suggest that mucosal melanoma, well known for its poor response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and abysmal prognosis, is a heterogeneous subtype of melanoma with distinct genomic and clinical characteristics between different anatomic locations of the primary lesions. Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus (PMME) is a rare, highly aggressive disease with a poorer prognosis compared with that of non-esophageal mucosal melanoma (NEMM). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of anti-programmed death (PD)-1 in patients with PMME and explored its molecular basis. Methods: The response and survival of patients with PMME and NEMM under anti-PD-1 monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. To explore the molecular mechanisms of the difference in therapeutic efficacy between PMME and NEMM, we performed genomic analysis, bulk RNA sequencing, and multiplex immunohistochemistry staining. Results: We found that PMME (n=28) responded better to anti-PD-1 treatment than NEMM (n=64), with a significantly higher objective response rate (33.3% (95% CI 14.3% to 52.3%) vs 6.6% (95% CI 0.2% to 12.9%)) and disease control rate (74.1% (95% CI 56.4% to 91.7%) vs 37.7% (95% CI 25.2% to 50.2%)). Genomic sequencing analysis revealed that the genomic aberration landscape of PMME predominated in classical cancer driver genes, with approximately half of PMME cases harboring mutations in BRAF, N/KRAS, and NF1. In contrast, most NEMM cases were triple wild-type. Transcriptome analysis revealed that, compared with NEMM, PMME displayed more significant proliferation and inflammatory features with higher expression of genes related to antigen presentation and differentiation, and a less immunosuppressive signature with lower expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints and dedifferentiation-related genes. The multiplex immunohistochemical analysis also demonstrated higher CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration in PMME than in NEMM. Conclusions: PMME is an outlier of mucosal melanoma showing a malicious phenotype but a particularly high response rate to ICB because of its distinct molecular characteristics. Patient stratification based on anatomic origin can facilitate clinical decision-making in patients with mucosal melanoma following the verification of our results in future prospective studies.