Melissa Scricciolo

Dr. Melissa Scricciolo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2023 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KTKatherine Taylor
Katherine Taylor
CACecilie D. Amdal
Cecilie D. Amdal
KBKristin Bjordal
Kristin Bjordal
GAGuro Lindviksmoen Astrup
Guro Lindviksmoen Astrup
BHBente B. Herlofson
Bente B. Herlofson
SSSusanne Singer
Susanne Singer
The long-term problems of head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) are not well known. In a cross-sectional international study aimed at exploring the long-term quality of life in this population, 1114 HNCS were asked to state their two most serious long-term effects. A clinician recorded the responses during face-to-face appointments. A list of 15 example problems was provided, but a free text field was also available. A total of 1033 survivors responded to the question. The most frequent problems were ‘dry mouth’ (DM) (n = 476; 46%), ‘difficulty swallowing/eating’ (DSE) (n = 408; 40%), ‘hoarseness/difficulty speaking’ (HDS) (n = 169; 16%), and ‘pain in the head and neck’ (PHN) (n = 142; 14%). A total of 5% reported no problems. Logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, treatment, and tumor stage and site showed increased odds of reporting DM and DSE for chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) alone compared to surgery alone (odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–9.0; OR: 2.1, CI: 1.1–3.9), but decreased odds for HDS and PHN (OR: 0.3, CI: 0.1–0.6; OR: 0.2, CI: 0.1–0.5). Survivors with UICC stage IV at diagnosis compared to stage I had increased odds of reporting HDS (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.2–3.0). Laryngeal cancer survivors had reduced odds compared to oropharynx cancer survivors of reporting DM (OR: 0.4, CI: 0.3–0.6) but increased odds of HDS (OR: 7.2, CI: 4.3–12.3). This study provides evidence of the serious long-term problems among HNCS.


26 September 2015 in Tumori Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRita Bellavita
Rita Bellavita
MSMelissa Scricciolo
Melissa Scricciolo
VBVittorio Bini
Vittorio Bini
FAFabio Arcidiacono
Fabio Arcidiacono
GMGIAMPAOLO MONTESI
GIAMPAOLO MONTESI
CACynthia Aristei
Cynthia Aristei
Aims: To demonstrate that radiotherapy (RT) is a valid alternative to surgery in men ≤70 years old with localized prostate cancer. Methods: From 1988 to 2009, 214 patients with T1-2 N0 M0 prostate cancer were treated with RT. The effects of patient- and treatment-related risk factors on toxicity were investigated. Results: Median follow-up was 105 months (range 14.2-180). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year biochemical relapse-free survival for all 214 patients was 80%, 61.9%, and 57.5%, respectively. In bivariate analysis, age (≤65 vs 65-70 years) was not a significant factor for biochemical relapse, while radiation dose was (p = 0.05) in multivariate analysis. Cancer-specific survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 98.4%, 93.2%, and 69.7%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 167 months (95% confidence interval 147.3-186.7). The OS rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 91.8%, 75.8%, and 42.5%, respectively. Acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities occurred in 105 (49%) and 98 patients (45.8%), respectively, with only 2 cases of grade III GI toxicity. Late GU and GI toxicities occurred in 17 (7.9%) and 20 (9.3%) patients, respectively, with 1 grade III GI toxicity and 2 grade III GU toxicities. Risk factors for late toxicity were age and RT dose and technique, which were unrelated to acute toxicity. Conclusions: Age ≤70 years does not consistently confer a negative prognosis for localized prostate cancer. Radiotherapy appears to be a viable alternative to surgery, offering excellent long-term cancer control.

30 December 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAndrea Emanuele Guerini
Andrea Emanuele Guerini
GMGiulia Marvaso
Giulia Marvaso
STSandro Tonoli
Sandro Tonoli
GCGiulia Corrao
Giulia Corrao
MTMaria Ausilia Teriaca
Maria Ausilia Teriaca
MBMichela Buglione
Michela Buglione
Methods and materials: Patients with ongoing or planned anticancer treatment at 19 Italian Radiation Oncology centers were included in the study retrospectively from 3 February 2020 to 31 December 2020 and prospectively from 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2021. Anonymized data were processed through a specific website and database. Antineoplastic treatment characteristics and timing and outcomes of COVID-19 and its impact on radiotherapy or systemic therapy were described. Results: The retrieved cohort included 41,039 patients that received treatment or were planned for therapy in the study period. Overall, 123 patients had a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis during antineoplastic treatment (group A) and 99 patients before treatment start (group B). The incidence of COVID-19 across the whole cohort in the index period was 0.54% (groups A + B) and 0.30% considering only group A. A total of 60 patients developed severe COVID-19, and a total of 45 patients died as a consequence of the infection (incidence of 0.15% and 0.11%, respectively). Nonetheless, mortality among COVID-19 patients was high, with an attributable death rate after confirmed infection of 20.27%. Among the 123 patients in group A, 37.4% required temporary treatment suspension, 32.5% definitive suspension and 37 patients continued treatment while positive. As for the 99 patients in group B, 53.5% experienced temporary delay, 20.2% experienced definitive treatment suspension and 26.3% had no delay. Conclusions: Most of the patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis in our cohort recovered and completed their treatment; nonetheless, the attributable death rate after confirmed infection was 20.27%, and mortality was high among cancer patients with severe COVID-19 presentation. The global incidence of death due to COVID-19 or severe COVID-19 was low and decreased over time. Radiation oncology activity could be safely continued during the COVID-19 pandemic with the adoption of adequate preventive measures.