Lee YS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Oct;39:e316. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e316

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monograph conducted a systematic review of the relationship between asbestos and ovarian cancer. However, there may have been information bias due to the undue weight given to few articles. To address this limitation, the present study performed a meta-analysis integrating studies published both before and after the 2012 IARC Monograph on Asbestos, with the aim of investigating the association between asbestos exposure and ovarian cancer. A comprehensive search of major journal databases was conducted to identify studies examining the relationship between asbestos exposure and ovarian cancer, including those featured in the 2012 IARC Monograph on Asbestos. A meta-analysis on asbestos exposure and cancer risk was performed. The meta-analysis of studies published after the 2012 IARC Monograph on Asbestos found a summary Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) of 2.04 (95% CI: 1.03—4.05; p = 0.0123; 5 studies), with a significant degree of heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 72.99%). The combined analysis of 15 studies before and after the 2012 IARC Monograph showed an overall summary SMR of 1.72 (95% CI: 1.43—2.06; p = 0.0349; 15 studies), with a moderate degree of heterogeneity (I² = 42.99%). This meta-analysis provides evidence of a significant association between asbestos exposure and ovarian cancer mortality. While the possibility of misdiagnosis in earlier studies cannot be completely ruled out, recent findings suggest a robust correlation between asbestos exposure and ovarian cancer. This highlights the importance of sustained efforts to minimize asbestos exposure and protect public health.

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the Republic of Korea’s Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM). This study aims to examine the Republic of Korea’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on Health-EDRM, especially human resources, health services, and logistics. Challenges in the Republic of Korea, including lack of medical workforce, confused risk communication, shortage of hospital beds, and inefficient distribution of medical resources, have been highlighted in this paper in terms of human resources, health service delivery, and logistics, which are components of Health-EDRM. It is essential to address the cooperation between the government and private sectors, the protection of occupational health and safety of medical staff during the pandemic, and strategies and technologies to scale up the health facilities, to respond to a future crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic.

The objective of this study is to identify the working conditions and health status of Vietnamese male migrant workers in Republic of Korea, in comparison to the Korean general population. We conducted our survey through the Migrant People Center, and we received completed questionnaires from 87 male Vietnamese migrant workers. The questionnaire employed was identical to those used in the Korean Working Conditions Survey and the 2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The collected data from the Vietnamese migrant workers was then compared with the Korean reference population using indirect age-standardization. Vietnamese male workers demonstrated a higher prevalence of health problems including hearing problems (age-standardized prevalence ratio (aSPR) 13.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.07–20.4), skin problems (aSPR 13.49, 95% CI: 8.07–20.4), and low back pain (aSPR 8.40, 95% CI: 6.50–10.69). Elevated exposure to workplace hazards such as chemicals (aSPR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.51–3.51), organic solvents (aSPR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.44–3.28), handling of heavy objects (aSPR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24–2.21), and high temperatures (aSPR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.46–2.57) was observed among them. Additionally, they faced a higher risk of no personal protective equipment (aSPR 2.53, 95% CI: 1.26–4.52) and a greater prevalence of unmet medical needs (aSPR 7.14, 95% CI: 4.74–10.32). Our findings highlight the elevated workplace hazards, health problems, and unmet medical needs among Vietnamese male workers compared to the Korean reference population. These findings underscores the urgency for enhanced scrutiny over working conditions and protective equipment provision, coupled with efforts to improve healthcare accessibility and worker education.

Background: This study aims to investigate the associations between work-related activities during free time, including frequency of working during free time and use of communication devices for work during free time, and sleep disturbance. It further explores the underlying mechanisms through mediation analysis.Methods: Data were analyzed from 21,473 participants of the seventh Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS, 2023). Multivariable logistic regression was employed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for sleep disturbance. Three sequential models were constructed to evaluate the effects of weekly working hours and shift work on sleep disturbance risk. Mediation analysis was conducted to identify pathways linking work-related activities during free time and sleep disturbance.Results: Those who worked during their free time daily showed significantly higher risk of sleep disturbance (OR: 4.17; 95% CI: 2.64–6.58). Similarly, daily use of communication devices for work during free time was associated with an increased risk (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.57–2.13). These associations remained robust even after adjusting for weekly working hours and shift work. Mediation analysis revealed that "worry about work while at home" was the primary mediator for device use (13.7%; 95% CI: 0.11–0.18), while "feeling too tired for housework after work" was the strongest mediator for working during free time (26.6%; 95% CI: 0.22–0.32).Conclusions: The results indicate that engaging in work-related activities during free time elevates the risk of sleep disturbance, independent of long working hours or shift patterns. Mediation analysis revealed that the strongest effects were driven by the behavioral and psychological dimensions of work–family conflict. These findings suggest that sleep disturbance arises primarily from the erosion of work–life boundaries, fueled by persistent work-related rumination and the spillover of professional burdens into free time.