In clinical pharmacology, the free drug hypothesis has been widely applied in the interpretation of the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). The free drug hypothesis assumes that the unbound drug concentration in blood is the same as that in the site of action at steady state. The objective of this study is to demonstrate whether the free drug hypothesis is universally applicable for all drugs. The unbound concentrations of the 18 compounds in blood and in brain interstitial fluids (ISF) at steady state following constant intravenous infusion were simultaneously monitored up to 6 hours via in vivo microdialysis technique. Based on the permeability and efflux ratio (ER), the test compounds can be divided into two classes. Class I includes the compounds with good membrane permeability that are not substrates of efflux transporters (eg, P‐gp, BCRP, and MRPs), whereas Class II includes the compounds that are substrates of efflux transporters. The steady‐state unbound drug concentrations in blood, brain, and CSF are quantitatively very similar for Class I compounds, whereas the steady‐state unbound concentrations in the brain and CSF are significantly lower than those in blood for Class II compounds. These results strongly suggest that the free drug hypothesis is not universal for all drugs but is only applicable for drugs with good permeability that are not substrates of efflux transporters.

The unbound concentrations of 14 commercial drugs, including five non‐efflux/uptake transporter substrates—Class I, five efflux transporter substrates—class II and four influx transporter substrates—Class III, were simultaneously measured in rat liver, muscle, and blood via microanalysis. K_puu,liver and K_puu,muscle were calculated to evaluate the membrane transport activity and cell metabolism on the unbound drug concentrations in the skeletal muscle and liver. For Class I compounds, represented by antipyrine, unbound concentrations among liver, muscle and blood are symmetrically distributed when compound hepatic clearance is low. And when compound hepatic clearance is high, unbound concentrations among liver, muscle and blood are asymmetrically distributed, such as Propranolol. For Class II and III compounds, overall, the unbound concentrations among liver, muscle, and blood are asymmetrically distributed due to a combination of hepatic metabolism and efflux and/or influx transporter activity.