Urban design and architecture have inadvertently contributed to the bifurcation of societies divided into haves and have-nots, thus undermining social equity, restricting opportunity, and resulting in poverty next to overabundance and waste. Global population growth and urban migration pressures compound the problem. The call for social equity and justice is, therefore, urgent from a social perspective and an environmental one. This study explores a concept we call ‘value-inclusive design’ and its potential for transformation toward ‘judicial equity’. Our value-inclusive design method proposes neighborhood interactions and co-design as a way to create welcoming spaces that preserve natural resources, support economic sustainability, and improve architectural design to foster health and wellbeing for people and the environment. This article discusses the potential of our value-inclusive design model in contributing to judicial equity by applying it to an international student competition called the ‘Global Greenhouse Challenge #3’, launched by Wageningen University and Research. By viewing the results of the Global Greenhouse challenge through the lens of value-inclusive design, we find that the model has merit and provides a useful theoretical framework for promoting social equity in urban planning and design. We conclude that by applying the model, its constructs can enhance design approaches that seek to improve the quality of life of residents while building resilience and shifting agency through co-design. The model can, thus, be a means for driving continuous improvement in architectural design and applying it in an educational setting such as the Global Greenhouse Challenge student competition.

Throughout history, communities have struggled to build homes in places actively hostile to their presence, a challenge long faced by African descendants in the American diaspora. In cities across the U.S., including Washington, D.C., efforts have often been made to erase Black cultural identity. D.C., once a hub of Black culture, saw its urban fabric devastated during the 1968 riots following Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination. Since then, redevelopment has been slow and, more recently, marked by gentrification, which has further displaced Black communities. Amid this context, Black architects such as Michael Marshall, FAIA, and Sean Pichon, AIA, have emerged as visionary leaders. Their work exemplifies Value-Inclusive Design and aligns with Roberto Verganti’s Design-Driven Innovation by embedding cultural relevance and community needs into development projects. These architects propose an intentional approach that centers Black identity and brings culturally meaningful businesses into urban redevelopment, shifting the paradigm of design practice in D.C. This collective case study (methodology) argues that their work represents a distinct architectural style, Black Modernism, characterized by cultural preservation, community engagement, and spatial justice. This research examines two central questions: Where does Black Modernism begin, and where does it end? How does it fit within and expand beyond the broader American Modernist architectural movement? It explores the consequences of the destruction of Black communities, the lived experiences of Black architects, and how those experiences are reflected in their designs. Additionally, the research suggests that the work of Black architects aligns with heutagogical pedagogy, which views community stakeholders not just as beneficiaries, but as educators and knowledge-holders in architectural preservation. Findings reveal that Black Modernism, therefore, is not only a design style but a method of reclaiming identity, telling untold histories, and building more inclusive cities.

Urgency asks us to transform our cities and re-embed them into soil, water and living organisms to safeguard our planet’s resources and restore biodiversity. This book introduces the symbiotic city...

Black Modernist architecture offers a powerful yet underexamined pathway for advancing restorative capacity in American cities. This paper argues that Black Modernism functions as a restorative design methodology, addressing social, economic, and ecological harm imposed on Black communities through slavery, racial capitalism, urban renewal, and infrastructural violence. Grounded in the restorative economics framework pioneered by O’Hara, the paper explores the role Black Modernism plays in sustaining sink capacities defined as the social, ecological, and emotional processes that absorb stress, pollution, waste, and trauma. Conventional economic models ignore these capacities, despite their necessity for economic productivity. Black communities, like all marginalized communities, have historically been forced to provide them without compensation. Situating Black Modernist architecture within this framework, the paper demonstrates how Black architects have designed buildings and landscapes that restore dignity, memory, health, and cultural identity, thereby expanding community sink capacities. Drawing on the works of various scholars, the paper examines case studies from Washington, DC, Atlanta, and Chicago, which reveal how Black communities have borne the burden of unremunerated restorative labor while shaping the American built environment. The paper positions Black Modernism as both a design language and a political–economic intervention, challenging architectural value systems that privilege monumental production over community restoration. It concludes by proposing a Restorative Design Framework that integrates Black Modernist principles with restorative economics, offering policy and planning pathways that recognize cultural labor, emotional restoration, and community well-being as essential components of sustainable urban development.