Giselle Fernandez

Dr. Giselle Fernandez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2023 in Advances in Computational Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
LLLivermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Multi-fidelity models provide a framework for integrating computational models of varying complexity, allowing for accurate predictions while optimizing computational resources. These models are especially beneficial when acquiring high-accuracy data is costly or computationally intensive. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of multi-fidelity models, focusing on their applications in scientific and engineering fields, particularly in optimization and uncertainty quantification. It classifies publications on multi-fidelity modeling according to several criteria, including application area, surrogate model selection, types of fidelity, combination methods and year of publication. The study investigates techniques for combining different fidelity levels, with an emphasis on multi-fidelity surrogate models. This work discusses reproducibility, open-sourcing methodologies and benchmarking procedures to promote transparency. The manuscript also includes educational toy problems to enhance understanding. Additionally, this paper outlines best practices for presenting multi-fidelity-related savings in a standardized, succinct and yet thorough manner. The review concludes by examining current trends in multi-fidelity modeling, including emerging techniques, recent advancements, and promising research directions.

1 December 2021 in Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QKQingkai Kong
Qingkai Kong
ACAndrea Chiang
Andrea Chiang
AAAna C. Aguiar
Ana C. Aguiar
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
SMStephen C. Myers
Stephen C. Myers
Donald D. LucasDonald D. Lucas
Donald D. Lucas

1 January 2021 in Computational Materials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
NPNishant Panda
Nishant Panda
DODaniel O’mAlley
Daniel O’mAlley
KLKevin Larkin
Kevin Larkin
Abigail HunterAbigail Hunter
Abigail Hunter
GSGowri Srinivasan
Gowri Srinivasan

28 June 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJulia B. Nakhleh
Julia B. Nakhleh
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
MGMichael J. Grosskopf
Michael J. Grosskopf
BWBrandon M. Wilson
Brandon M. Wilson
JKJohn Kline
John Kline
GSGowri Srinivasan
Gowri Srinivasan
Building a sustainable burn platform in inertial confinement fusion (ICF) requires an understanding of the complex coupling of physical processes and the effects that key experimental design changes have on implosion performance. While simulation codes are used to model ICF implosions, incomplete physics and the need for approximations deteriorate their predictive capability. Identification of relationships between controllable design inputs and measurable outcomes can help guide the future design of experiments and development of simulation codes, which can potentially improve the accuracy of the computational models used to simulate ICF implosions. In this article, we leverage developments in machine learning (ML) and methods for ML feature importance/sensitivity analysis to identify complex relationships in ways that are difficult to process using expert judgment alone. We present work using random forest (RF) regression for prediction of yield, velocity, and other experimental outcomes given a suite of design parameters, along with an assessment of important relationships and uncertainties in the prediction model. We show that RF models are capable of learning and predicting on ICF experimental data with high accuracy, and we extract feature importance metrics that provide insight into the physical significance of different controllable design inputs for various ICF design configurations. These results can be used to augment expert intuition and simulation results for optimal design of future ICF experiments.

1 June 2024 in Physics of Plasmas
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJ. Luc Peterson
J. Luc Peterson
TBTim Bender
Tim Bender
RBRobert Blake
Robert Blake
NCNai-Yuan Chiang
Nai-Yuan Chiang
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
CWChris Weber
Chris Weber
High performance computing has entered the Exascale Age. Capable of performing over 1018 floating point operations per second, exascale computers, such as El Capitan, the National Nuclear Security Administration's first, have the potential to revolutionize the detailed in-depth study of highly complex science and engineering systems. However, in addition to these kind of whole machine “hero” simulations, exascale systems could also enable new paradigms in digital design by making petascale hero runs routine. Currently, untenable problems in complex system design, optimization, model exploration, and scientific discovery could all become possible. Motivated by the challenge of uncovering the next generation of robust high-yield inertial confinement fusion (ICF) designs, project ICECap (Inertial Confinement on El Capitan) attempts to integrate multiple advances in machine learning (ML), scientific workflows, high performance computing, GPU-acceleration, and numerical optimization to prototype such a future. Built on a general framework, ICECap is exploring how these technologies could broadly accelerate scientific discovery on El Capitan. In addition to our requirements, system-level design, and challenges, we describe some of the key technologies in ICECap, including ML replacements for multiphysics packages, tools for human-machine teaming, and algorithms for multifidelity design optimization under uncertainty. As a test of our prototype pre-El Capitan system, we advance the state-of-the art for ICF hohlraum design by demonstrating the optimization of a 17-parameter National Ignition Facility experiment and show that our ML-assisted workflow makes design choices that are consistent with physics intuition, but in an automated, efficient, and mathematically rigorous fashion.

30 April 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GFGiselle Fernandez
Giselle Fernandez
This article provides an overview of multi-fidelity modeling trends. Fidelity in modeling refers to the level of detail and accuracy provided by a predictive model or simulation. Generally, models with higher fidelity deliver more precise results but demand greater computational resources. Multi-fidelity models integrate high-fidelity and low-fidelity models to obtain fast yet accurate predictions. Their growing popularity is due to their ability to approximate high-fidelity models with high accuracy and low computational cost. This work classifies publications in multi-fidelity modeling based on various factors, including application, surrogate selection, fidelity difference, fidelity combination method, field of application, and year of publication. The study also examines the techniques used to combine fidelities, focusing on multi-fidelity surrogate models. To accurately evaluate the advantages of utilizing multi-fidelity models, it is necessary to report the achieved time savings. This paper includes guidelines for authors to present their multi-fidelity-related savings in a standard, succinct, yet thorough way to guide future users. According to a select group of publications that provided sufficient information, multi-fidelity models achieved savings of up to 90% while maintaining the desired level of accuracy. However, the savings achieved through multi-fidelity models depend highly on the problem.